******************************************************** 
                      NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.

*****************************************************************



Media Contact: 
Mark Wigfield (202) 418-0253
mark.wigfield@fcc.gov
For Immediate Release
FCC PLANS TO FINE AT&T $106,425 FOR OVERCHARGING 
SCHOOLS IN FLORIDA
AT&T Charged with Violating  “Lowest Corresponding Price” Rule, Ordered to Repay 
Universal Service Fund $63,760
  --WASHINGTON, July 27, 2016 – The Federal Communications Commission plans to fine 
AT&T $106,425 for charging two Florida school districts some of the highest 
telecommunications rates in the state, in apparent violation of federal law and the FCC’s “lowest 
corresponding price” rule.   The lowest corresponding price rule helps ensure that schools and 
libraries that participate in the FCC’s E-rate Program get the best rates available by prohibiting E-
rate service providers from charging them more than the lowest price paid by other similarly 
situated customers for similar telecommunications services.  The Commission alleges that AT&T 
charged the school districts prices for telephone service that were magnitudes higher than many 
other customers in Florida.  One or both school districts paid the highest price in all of Florida for 
one service, while other customers paid much less.  In addition to the fine, the FCC plans to order 
AT&T to repay $63,760 it apparently improperly received from the Universal Service Fund as a 
subsidy for these services.
“Charging school districts among the highest rates in the state for telephone or broadband internet 
service is outrageous,” said Enforcement Bureau Chief Travis LeBlanc. “Schools and libraries
across the country heavily rely upon federal and state funds to afford these critical services. We 
expect that every service provider will offer participating schools and libraries the same low rates 
that they charge to other similarly situated customers.”
The schools and libraries universal service support program, commonly known as the E-rate 
Program, enables eligible schools, libraries, and consortia of eligible schools and libraries to 
receive discounts on telecommunications services, Internet access, internal connections, basic 
maintenance costs and managed internal broadband services. In its 2014 modernization of E-rate, 
the Commission directed the Enforcement Bureau to devote additional resources to enforcing the 
lowest corresponding price rule as part of a broader effort to maximize the benefits E-rate 
provides in schools and libraries and produce savings in the program.
In today’s Notice of Apparent Liability (NAL), the Commission alleges that AT&T violated the 
lowest corresponding price rule from at least mid-2012 to mid-2015, when it charged the school 
districts in Orange County and Dixie County, Florida, prices well above what other customers in 
the state paid. In addition, in each of these years AT&T certified its compliance with the E-rate 
program’s rules, apparently inaccurately. These certifications caused the Universal Service Fund 
to subsidize the school districts’ services at greatly inflated prices and allowed AT&T to receive 
at least $63,760 in federal support that it should not have received.     
The Notice of Apparent Liability (NAL) is available at: 
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-16-98A1.pdf
An NAL details the Commission’s allegations of unlawful conduct, and proposes a monetary 
forfeiture for such conduct. The description of the NAL set forth herein and the apparent 
violations found in the NAL should be treated as allegations.  Members of the public who have 
information related to this matter may provide it at https://consumercomplaints.fcc.gov/.
Action by the Commission July 27, 2016, by Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (FCC 
16-98).  By the Commission: Commissioner Pai Dissenting and issuing a statement; 
Commissioner O’Rielly Dissenting.
###
Office of Media Relations: (202) 418-0500
TTY: (888) 835-5322
Twitter: @FCC
www.fcc.gov/office-media-relations
This is an unofficial announcement of Commission action.  Release of the full text of a Commission order 
constitutes official action.  See MCI v. FCC, 515 F.2d 385 (D.C. Cir. 1974).