******************************************************** 
                      NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from
WordPerfect or Word to ASCII Text format.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Word or WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available.

*****************************************************************




                         Before the
              FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
                   Washington, D.C.  20554


USA Global Link, Inc.,                       )
                              )
     Complainant,                  )
                              )
     v.                       )    File No. E-99-09
                              )
Teleglobe USA Inc.,                )
                                                  )
     Defendant.                    )

                            ORDER
     Adopted:  September 12, 2000       Released:  September 
13, 2000

By the Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, 
Enforcement Bureau:

     1.   On January 14, 1999, USA Global Link, Inc. (USA 
Global Link) filed the captioned complaint against Teleglobe 
USA Inc. (Teleglobe) alleging, among other things, that 
Teleglobe violated sections 201(b) and 203(c)(1) of the 
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 201(b), 
203(c)(1).  In short, USA Global Link claimed that Teleglobe 
improperly charged USA Global Link for purportedly 
fraudulent calls placed by USA Global Link's customers using 
the company's callback service.

     2.   The parties recently entered into negotiations for 
the purpose of settling their dispute.  On September 8, 
2000, they filed a joint motion to dismiss the complaint 
pending against Teleglobe with prejudice.

     3.   We are satisfied that dismissing the complaint 
will serve the public interest by promoting the private 
resolution of disputes and by eliminating the need for 
further litigation and the expenditure of further time and 
resources of the parties and this Commission.

     4.   Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 
1, 4(i), 4(j), 201(b), 203(c)(1), and 208 of the 
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 
154(i), 154(j), 201(b), 203(c)(1), and 208, and the 
authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the 
Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.111 and 0.311, that the 
joint motion to dismiss the above-captioned complaint with 
prejudice IS GRANTED.
     5.   IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above-captioned 
complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and that the 
proceeding IS TERMINATED.

                         FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


                         Alexander P. Starr
                         Chief, Market Disputes Resolution 
Division
                         Enforcement Bureau