******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect or Word to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the Word or WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 AT&T Corp., ) ) Complainant) ) ) v. ) File Nos. E-95-30 ) and E-99-15S GTE NORTH, INC., GTE NORTHWEST, INC. ) GTE WEST COAST, INC., GTE SOUTH, INC. ) GTE SOUTHWEST, INC., MIDWEST, INC., ) GTE HAWAIIAN TELEPHONE CO., INC., ) GTE ALASKTA, INC., GTE CALIFORNIA, INC., ) GTE FLORIDA, INC., CONTEL OF THE SOUTH, INC., ) CONTEL OF THE WEST, INC., ) CONTEL OF MINNESOTA, INC., ) CONTEL OF TEXAS, INC., ) CONTEL SYSTEM OF MISSOURI, INC., ) KANSAS STATE TELEPHONE, ) CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC., and ) THE MICRONESAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS ) CORP., ) Defendants. ORDER Adopted: August 22, 2000 Released: August 23, 2000 By the Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This matter comes before the Commission on the Joint Motion of AT&T Corp. and GTE, et al. to Dismiss With Prejudice (``Joint Motion''). The above-captioned formal complaint addresses the defendants' practice of improperly assessing carrier common line charges for interstate calls involving certain optional calling services. 2. We are satisfied that dismissing this complaint will serve the public interest by promoting the private resolution of disputes and by eliminating the need for further litigation and the expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201(b), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.111, 0.311, that the parties' Joint Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice IS GRANTED. 4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and that this proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Glenn T. Reynolds Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau