Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
Federal Communications Commission DA 16-850
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, DC 20554
In the Matter of
TP-Link USA Corporation,
an indirect subsidiary of
TP-Link Technologies CO., Ltd
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
File No.: EB-SED-15-00019891
Acct. No.: 201632100008
FRN: 0025770090
ORDER
Adopted: August 1, 2016 Released: August 1, 2016
By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau:
1. The Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission
(Commission) has entered into a Consent Decree to resolve its investigation into whether TP-Link USA
Corporation, an indirect wholly-owned-subsidiary of TP-Link Technologies CO., Ltd. (“TP-Link”),
unlawfully marketed Wi-Fi routers that fail to comply with the Commission’s regulations. The
Commission’s equipment marketing and authorization rules ensure that Wi-Fi routers and other devices
that emit radio frequency radiation comply with the Commission’s technical requirements and do not
interfere with authorized communications. During the course of the investigation, TP-Link took measures
to halt the sale of the noncompliant units and made software updates to existing Wi-Fi routers available to
its customers that were designed to ensure compliance with the Commission’s rules. To settle this matter,
TP-Link admits that its marketing of the radio frequency devices covered by the Bureau’s investigation
violated the Commission’s rules. In addition, TP-Link will pay a civil penalty of $200,000 and
implement a long-term compliance plan to ensure future compliance with the Commission’s equipment
marketing rules.
2. It has long been Commission policy to foster innovation by enabling novel uses of
technology.
1
As part of the Consent Decree, TP-Link agrees to investigate software and hardware
solutions that would enable customers to install and operate third-party firmware on TP-Link routers,
while maintaining the integrity of critical radio parameters.
3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we
find that the public interest would be served by adopting the Consent Decree and terminating the
referenced investigation regarding TP-Link’s compliance with Section 302(b) of the Communications Act
of 1934, as amended, (the Act) and Sections 2.803(b)(1), 2.931, 15.15(b), 15.202, 15.205(b), 15.209, and
15.247(d) of the Commission’s rules.
2
1
47 U.S.C. § 157; see, e.g., Promoting Expanded Opportunities for Radio Experimentation and Market Trials
Under Part 5 of the Commission’s Rules and Streamlining Other Related Rules, Report and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 758,
760 (2013) modified, 30 FCC Rcd 7446 (2015).
2
47 U.S.C. § 302a(b); 47 CFR §§ 2.803(b)(1), 2.931, 15.15(b), 15.202, 15.205(b), 15.209, and 15.247(d).
Federal Communications Commission DA 16-850
2
4. In the absence of material new evidence relating to this matter, we do not set for hearing
the question of TP-Link’s basic qualifications to hold or obtain any Commission license or authorization.
3
5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Act
4
and the
authority delegated by Sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission’s rules,
5
the attached Consent Decree
IS ADOPTED and its terms incorporated by reference.
6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above-captioned matter IS TERMINATED.
7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order and Consent Decree shall be
sent by first class mail and certified mail, return receipt requested, to Mr. Lewis Wu, Executive Vice
President, TP-Link USA Corporation, 975 Overland Ct., San Dimas, CA 91773; and to TP-Link’s lawyer,
Marty Stern, Esq., Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, L.L.P., 1200 Nineteenth Street NW, Suite 500,
Washington, DC 20036-2421.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Travis LeBlanc
Chief, Enforcement Bureau
3
See 47 CFR § 1.93(b).
4
47 U.S.C. § 154(i).
5
47 CFR §§ 0.111, 0.311.
Federal Communications Commission DA 16-850
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, DC 20554
In the Matter of
TP-Link USA Corporation,
an indirect subsidiary of
TP-Link Technologies CO., Ltd.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
File No.: EB-SED-15-00019891
Acct. No.: 201632100008
FRN: 0025770090
CONSENT DECREE
1. The Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission and TP-Link USA
Corporation, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of TP-Link Technologies CO., Ltd., by their authorized
representatives, hereby enter into this Consent Decree for the purpose of terminating the Enforcement
Bureau’s investigation into whether TP-Link violated 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b); 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803(b)(1),
2.931, 15.15(b), 15.202, 15.205(b), 15.209, and 15.247(d) in connection with marketing noncompliant
Wi-Fi routers.
I. DEFINITIONS
2. For the purposes of this Consent Decree, the following definitions shall apply:
(a) “Act” means the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.
1
(b) “Adopting Order” means an order of the Bureau adopting the terms of this Consent
Decree without change, addition, deletion, or modification.
(c) “Bureau” means the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications
Commission.
(d) “Commission” and “FCC” mean the Federal Communications Commission and all
of its bureaus and offices.
(e) “Communications Laws” means collectively, the Act, the Rules, and the published
and promulgated orders and decisions of the Commission to which TP-Link is
subject by virtue of its business activities, including but not limited to the
Equipment Authorization and Marketing Rules.
(f) “Compliance Plan” means the compliance obligations, program, and procedures
described in this Consent Decree at paragraph 15.
(g) “Covered Employees” means all employees and agents of TP-Link who perform, or
supervise, oversee, or manage the performance of, duties that relate to TP-Link’s
responsibilities under the Communications Laws, including the Equipment
Authorization and Marketing Rules.
(h) “Effective Date” means the date by which both the Bureau and TP-Link have signed
the Consent Decree.
(i) “Equipment Authorization and Marketing Rules” means 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b); 47
C.F.R. §§ 2.803(b)(1), 2.931, 15.15(b), 15.202, 15.205(b), 15.209, 15.247(d) and
1
47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq.
Federal Communications Commission DA 16-850
2
other provisions of the Communications Laws related to authorization, testing, and
marketing radio frequency devices.
(j) “Investigation” means the investigation commenced by the Bureau in EB-SED-15-
00019891 regarding whether TP-Link violated the Equipment Authorization and
Marketing Rules by marketing routers in the United States that were shipped with
TP-Link software that permitted the user to change the country code for the router,
thereby enabling the router to operate at a higher power than allowed on certain
restricted Wi-Fi channels.
(k) “Operating Procedures” means the standard internal operating procedures and
compliance policies established by TP-Link to implement the Compliance Plan.
(l) “Parties” means TP-Link and the Bureau, each of which is a “Party.”
(m) “Rules” means the Commission’s regulations found in Title 47 of the Code of
Federal Regulations.
(n) “TP-Link” means TP-Link USA Corporation, and its U.S. affiliates, subsidiaries,
predecessors-in-interest, and successors-in-interest, and any TP-Link Technologies
CO., Ltd. affiliated entity that now, or at any time in the future, imports into or
markets in the U.S. radio frequency devices.
II. BACKGROUND
3. Section 302 of the Act authorizes the Commission to promulgate reasonable regulations
to minimize harmful interference by equipment that emits radio frequency energy.
2
Specifically,
Section 302(b) of the Act provides that “[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship
devices or home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations
promulgated pursuant to this section.”
3
The purpose of Section 302 of the Act is to ensure that radio
transmitters and other electronic devices meet certain standards to control interference before they reach
the market.
4. The Commission carries out its responsibilities under Section 302 of the Act in two ways.
First, the Commission establishes technical requirements for transmitters and other equipment to
minimize their potential for causing interference to authorized radio services. For Wi-Fi routers, the
technical requirements include permissible operating bands, power levels and modulation types, and
limits on the power levels of operation on certain restricted Wi-Fi channels.
4
Additionally, Section
15.15(b) of the Rules requires that the equipment “must be constructed such that any adjustments of any
control that is readily…accessible to the user will not cause operation of the device in violation of the
regulation.”
5
5. Second, the Commission administers an equipment authorization program to ensure that
equipment reaching the market in the United States complies with the technical and administrative
requirements set forth in the Rules. In that regard, Section 2.803(b) of the Rules prohibits the marketing
of radio frequency devices unless the device has first been properly authorized and is in compliance with
the technical requirements in accordance with the Rules.
6
2
47 U.S.C. § 302a.
3
Id. § 302a(b).
4
See 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.247(d); 15.202, 15.205(a), (c); 15.209(a).
5
Id. § 15.15(b).
6
See 47 C.F.R. § 2.803(b).
Federal Communications Commission DA 16-850
3
6. More recently, for Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (U-NII) Wi-Fi
equipment operating in the 5 GHz Band, including for TP-Link models that are the subject of this
Investigation, the Commission has adopted radio security rules requiring that TP-Link and other router
manufacturers (a) refrain from offering a user configurable option that causes operation in violation of the
Commission’s radio frequency requirements, and (b) implement radio security measures to ensure that
third-party software modifications to the equipment cannot easily cause operation in violation of the
Commission’s radio frequency requirements.
7
The Commission’s technical requirements and equipment
authorization process under the new U-NII security rules do not address device functionality, and do not
prohibit third-party device software (including open-source software).
8
7. The Commission’s Office of Engineering Technology (OET) investigated a Wi-Fi router
marketed in the U.S. by TP-Link, and determined that TP-Link’s software installed on the router included
a user setting that violated Section 15.15(b) by permitting the user to change the country code for the
router, thereby enabling the router to operate at a higher power than allowed on certain restricted Wi-Fi
channels, in violation of the Rules. OET then referred the case to the Bureau for further investigation. As
a result of the Bureau’s investigation, TP-Link admitted that it had marketed a number of Wi-Fi router
models in the U.S. that included the aforementioned user setting, and, in that respect, failed to comply
with the applicable rules. In response, TP-Link took measures to halt the sale of noncompliant units and
made software updates to its Wi-Fi routers that were designed to ensure compliance with the Equipment
Authorization and Marketing Rules. These software updates additionally precluded customer installation
of third-party software, including open-source software. TP-Link made these additional changes so that
its routers would meet the new U-NII security requirements, but acknowledges that those rules do not
prohibit, as OET has made clear, third-party, open-source software otherwise compliant with U-NII
security requirements.
8. As described below, this Consent Decree resolves the Investigation. TP-Link agrees to
adopt a Compliance Plan to ensure its Wi-Fi routers comport with the Equipment Authorization and
Marketing Rules. As part of the Compliance Plan, TP-Link also agrees to take the steps set forth herein to
support the development of software by third-parties, including open-source software, for use with its
routers, which comply with the U-NII security requirements.
III. TERMS OF AGREEMENT
9. Adopting Order. The provisions of this Consent Decree shall be incorporated by the
Bureau in an Adopting Order.
7
See Revision of Part 15 of the Commission’s Rules to Permit Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (U-
NII) Devices in the 5 GHz Band, First Report and Order, 29 FCC Rcd 4127, ¶ 54 (2014)(“U-NII First Report and
Order”). The U-NII First Report and Order adopted transition periods for the new U-NII security rules, requiring
that (i) by 12 months from the effective date of the First Report and Order, by June 2, 2015, applications for
certification of 5 GHz devices must meet the new security rules, and (ii) within two years of the effective date, by
June 2, 2016, manufacture, marketing, sale and importation into the United States of devices that do not meet the
new rules must cease. Id., ¶ 129.
8
See Software Security Requirements for U-NII Devices, Publication No. 594280 D02, FCC, Office of Engineering
and Technology, Laboratory Division (Nov. 12, 2015), available at
https://apps.fcc.gov/kdb/GetAttachment.html?id=zXtrctoj6zH7oNEOO6De6g%3D%3D&desc=594280%20D02%2
0U-NII%20Device%20Security%20v01r03&tracking_number=39498 (“the Commission required . . . device
software that controls the RF parameters that ensure compliance with the Commission’s technical rules for
preventing harmful interference must be secured. The purpose . . . is to prevent modifications to the software that
could, for example, . . . enable tuning to unauthorized frequencies, increased power above authorized levels, etc.
The rule is not intended to prevent or inhibit modification of any other software or firmware in the device, such as
software modifications to improve performance, configure RF networks or improve cybersecurity.”). For ease of
drafting, the term software and firmware are used interchangeably in the remainder of this Consent Decree.
Federal Communications Commission DA 16-850
4
10. Jurisdiction. TP-Link agrees that the Bureau has jurisdiction over it and the matters
contained in this Consent Decree and has the authority to enter into and adopt this Consent Decree.
11. Effective Date; Violations. The Parties agree that this Consent Decree shall become
effective on the Effective Date as defined herein. As of the Effective Date, the Parties agree that this
Consent Decree shall have the same force and effect as any other order of the Commission.
12. Termination of Investigation. In express reliance on the covenants and representations
in this Consent Decree and to avoid further expenditure of public resources, the Bureau agrees to
terminate the Investigation. In consideration for the termination of the Investigation, TP-Link agrees to
the terms, conditions, and procedures contained herein. The Bureau further agrees that, in the absence of
new material evidence, it will not use the facts developed in the Investigation through the Effective Date,
or the existence of this Consent Decree, to institute, on its own motion, any new proceeding, formal or
informal, or take any action on its own motion against TP-Link concerning the matters that were the
subject of the Investigation. The Bureau also agrees that, in the absence of new material evidence, it will
not use the facts developed in the Investigation through the Effective Date, or the existence of this
Consent Decree, to institute on its own motion any proceeding, formal or informal, or to set for hearing
the question of TP-Link’s basic qualifications to be a Commission licensee or hold Commission licenses
or authorizations.
9
13. Admission of Liability. TP-Link admits for the purpose of this Consent Decree and for
Commission civil enforcement purposes, and in express reliance on the provisions of paragraph 12 herein,
that it marketed routers in the U.S. with software that included a user setting that permitted the user to
change the country code for the router, thereby permitting a user to set the routers to operate at a higher
power than allowed on certain restricted Wi-Fi channels, as described in paragraph 7, in violation of the
Equipment Authorization and Marketing Rules.
14. Compliance Officer. Within sixty (60) calendar days after the Effective Date, TP-Link
shall designate a senior corporate manager with the requisite corporate and organizational authority to
serve as a Compliance Officer and to discharge the duties set forth below. The person designated as the
Compliance Officer shall be responsible for developing, implementing, and administering the Compliance
Plan and ensuring that TP-Link complies with the terms and conditions of the Compliance Plan and this
Consent Decree. In addition to the general knowledge of the Communications Laws necessary to
discharge his or her duties under this Consent Decree, the Compliance Officer shall have specific
knowledge of the Equipment Authorization and Marketing Rules prior to assuming his/her duties.
15. Compliance Plan. For purposes of settling the matters set forth herein, TP-Link agrees
that it shall develop and implement a Compliance Plan on the schedule set forth herein to ensure future
compliance with the Communications Laws and with the terms and conditions of this Consent Decree.
With respect to the Equipment Authorization and Marketing Rules, TP-Link will implement, at a
minimum, the following procedures:
(a) Operating Procedures. Within sixty (60) calendar days after the Effective Date,
TP-Link shall establish Operating Procedures that all Covered Employees must
follow to help ensure TP-Link’s compliance with the Equipment Authorization and
Marketing Rules. TP-Link’s Operating Procedures shall include internal procedures
and policies specifically designed to ensure that:
i. TP-Link’s products imported into the U.S. or marketed in the U.S. are in
compliance with the Equipment Authorization and Marketing Rules;
9
See 47 C.F.R. 1.93(b).
Federal Communications Commission DA 16-850
5
ii. TP-Link will immediately take steps to remove from the marketplace any
TP-Link products that it imports into the U.S. or markets in the U.S. that are
discovered to be noncompliant;
iii. With respect to the equipment models referenced in paragraph 7 or other
noncompliant equipment identified at a later date, TP-Link will offer an
updated user downloadable version of software on its website to (a) remove
user settings that enable the user to change the country code for the device or
otherwise operate the device at a higher power or in a manner otherwise than
is permitted on certain restricted Wi-Fi channels under the Communications
Laws, and (b) implement reasonable radio security precautions designed to
prevent a user from such unauthorized operation;
iv. TP-Link, working with TP-Link Technologies CO., Ltd., will investigate
for certain of its router models the development of U-NII security solutions
that would allow for the use of third-party firmware with its devices while
meeting the Commission’s U-NII security requirements and maintaining the
integrity of critical radio parameters. As part of this effort, TP-Link, working
with TP-Link Technologies CO., Ltd., will cooperate and share information
with interested developers of third-party software and chipset manufacturers.
Nothing in the foregoing is intended to limit or affect the ability of TP-Link or
TP-Link Technologies CO., Ltd.: (a) to assess, including by requiring
demonstration by any such third-party software developer, whether the
developer’s proposed designs will prevent access to the frequency or power
level protocols in TP-Link devices and otherwise comply with the U-NII
security requirements, and (b) to select, in its sole discretion, particular
chipsets, that it will use in the manufacture of its devices.
TP-Link shall also develop a Compliance Checklist that describes the steps that a
Covered Employee must follow to ensure compliance with the Equipment
Authorization and Marketing Rules.
(b) Compliance Manual. Within ninety (90) calendar days after the Effective Date, the
Compliance Officer shall develop and distribute a Compliance Manual to all
Covered Employees. The Compliance Manual shall explain the Equipment
Authorization and Marketing Rules and set forth the Operating Procedures that
Covered Employees shall follow to help ensure TP-Link’s compliance with the
Equipment Authorization and Marketing Rules. TP-Link shall periodically review
and revise the Compliance Manual as necessary to ensure that the information set
forth therein remains current and accurate. TP-Link shall distribute any revisions to
the Compliance Manual promptly to all Covered Employees.
(c) Compliance Training Program. TP-Link shall establish and implement a
Compliance Training Program on compliance with the Equipment Authorization and
Marketing Rules and the Operating Procedures. As part of the Compliance Training
Program, Covered Employees shall be advised of TP-Link’s obligation to report any
noncompliance with the Equipment Authorization and Marketing Rules under
paragraph 16 of this Consent Decree and shall be instructed on how to disclose
noncompliance to the Compliance Officer. All Covered Employees shall be trained
pursuant to the Compliance Training Program within ninety (90) calendar days after
the Effective Date, except that any person who becomes a Covered Employee at any
time after the initial Compliance Training Program shall be trained within thirty (30)
calendar days after the date such person becomes a Covered Employee. TP-Link
shall repeat compliance training on an annual basis, and shall periodically review
Federal Communications Commission DA 16-850
6
and revise the Compliance Training Program as necessary to ensure that it remains
current and complete and to enhance its effectiveness.
16. Reporting Noncompliance. TP-Link shall report any noncompliance with the
Equipment Authorization and Marketing Rules and with the terms and conditions of this Consent Decree
within fifteen (15) calendar days after discovery of such noncompliance. Such reports shall include a
detailed explanation of: (i) each instance of noncompliance; (ii) the steps that TP-Link has taken or will
take to remedy such noncompliance; (iii) the schedule on which such remedial actions will be taken; and
(iv) the steps that TP-Link has taken or will take to prevent the recurrence of any such noncompliance.
All reports of noncompliance shall be submitted to Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement
Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554, with a
copy submitted electronically to Maureen McCarthy at Maureen.McCarthy@fcc.gov and Neal McNeil at
Neal.McNeil@fcc.gov.
17. Compliance Reports. TP-Link shall file compliance reports with the Commission
ninety (90) calendar days after the Effective Date, twelve (12) months after the Effective Date, twenty-
four (24) months after the Effective Date, and thirty-six (36) months after the Effective Date.
(a) Each Compliance Report shall include a detailed description of TP-Link’s efforts
during the relevant period to comply with the terms and conditions of this Consent
Decree and the Equipment Authorization and Marketing Rules. In addition, each
Compliance Report shall include a certification by the Compliance Officer, as an
agent of and on behalf of TP-Link, stating that the Compliance Officer has personal
knowledge that TP-Link: (i) has established and implemented the Compliance Plan;
(ii) has utilized the Operating Procedures since the implementation of the
Compliance Plan; and (iii) is not aware of any instances of noncompliance with the
terms and conditions of this Consent Decree, including the reporting obligations set
forth in paragraph 16 of this Consent Decree.
(b) The Compliance Officer’s certification shall be accompanied by a statement
explaining the basis for such certification and shall comply with Section 1.16 of the
Rules and be subscribed to as true under penalty of perjury in substantially the form
set forth therein.
10
(c) If the Compliance Officer cannot provide the requisite certification provided in
paragraph 17(a), the Compliance Officer, as an agent of and on behalf of TP-Link,
shall provide the Commission with a detailed explanation of the reason(s) why and
describe fully: (i) each instance of noncompliance; (ii) the steps that TP-Link has
taken or will take to remedy such noncompliance, including the schedule on which
proposed remedial actions will be taken; and (iii) the steps that TP-Link has taken or
will take to prevent the recurrence of any such noncompliance, including the
schedule on which such preventive action will be taken.
(d) All Compliance Reports shall be submitted to Chief, Spectrum Enforcement
Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th
Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554, with a copy submitted electronically to
Maureen McCarthy at Maureen.McCarthy@fcc.gov and Neal McNeil at
Neal.McNeil@fcc.gov.
18. Termination Date. Unless stated otherwise, the requirements set forth in paragraphs 14
through 17 of this Consent Decree shall expire thirty-six (36) months after the Effective Date.
10
47 C.F.R. § 1.16.
Federal Communications Commission DA 16-850
7
19. Civil Penalty. TP-Link will pay a civil penalty to the United States Treasury in the
amount of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000) within thirty (30) calendar days of the Effective
Date. TP-Link shall send electronic notification of payment to Maureen McCarthy at
Maureen.McCarthy@fcc.gov; Neal McNeil at Neal.McNeil@fcc.gov; and Samantha Peoples at
Sam.Peoples@fcc.gov on the date said payment is made. The payment must be made by check or similar
instrument, wire transfer, or credit card, and must include the Account Number and FRN referenced
above. Regardless of the form of payment, a completed FCC Form 159 (Remittance Advice) must be
submitted.
11
When completing the FCC Form 159, enter the Account Number in block number 23A (call
sign/other ID) and enter the letters “FORF” in block number 24A (payment type code). Below are
additional instructions that should be followed based on the form of payment selected:
? Payment by check or money order must be made payable to the order of the Federal
Communications Commission. Such payments (along with the completed Form 159) must be
mailed to Federal Communications Commission, P.O. Box 979088, St. Louis, MO 63197-
9000, or sent via overnight mail to U.S. Bank – Government Lockbox #979088,
SL-MO-C2-GL, 1005 Convention Plaza, St. Louis, MO 63101.
? Payment by wire transfer must be made to ABA Number 021030004, receiving bank
TREAS/NYC, and Account Number 27000001. To complete the wire transfer and ensure
appropriate crediting of the wired funds, a completed Form 159 must be faxed to U.S. Bank
at (314) 418-4232 on the same business day the wire transfer is initiated.
? Payment by credit card must be made by providing the required credit card information on
FCC Form 159 and signing and dating the Form 159 to authorize the credit card payment.
The completed Form 159 must then be mailed to Federal Communications Commission, P.O.
Box 979088, St. Louis, MO 63197-9000, or sent via overnight mail to U.S. Bank –
Government Lockbox #979088, SL-MO-C2-GL, 1005 Convention Plaza, St. Louis, MO
63101.
Questions regarding payment procedures should be addressed to the Financial Operations Group Help
Desk by phone, 1-877-480-3201, or by e-mail, ARINQUIRIES@fcc.gov.
20. Waivers. As of the Effective Date, TP-Link waives any and all rights it may have to
seek administrative or judicial reconsideration, review, appeal or stay, or to otherwise challenge or contest
the validity of this Consent Decree and the Adopting Order. TP-Link shall retain the right to challenge
Commission interpretation of the Consent Decree or any terms contained herein. If either Party (or the
United States on behalf of the Commission) brings a judicial action to enforce the terms of the Consent
Decree or the Adopting Order, neither TP-Link nor the Commission shall contest the validity of the
Consent Decree or the Adopting Order, and TP-Link shall waive any statutory right to a trial de novo.
TP-Link hereby agrees to waive any claims it may otherwise have under the Equal Access to Justice Act
12
relating to the matters addressed in this Consent Decree.
21. Severability. The Parties agree that if any of the provisions of the Consent Decree shall
be held unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such unenforceability shall not render
unenforceable the entire Consent Decree, but rather the entire Consent Decree shall be construed as if not
containing the particular unenforceable provision or provisions, and the rights and obligations of the
Parties shall be construed and enforced accordingly.
11
An FCC Form 159 and detailed instructions for completing the form may be obtained at
http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form159/159.pdf.
12
See 5 U.S.C. § 504; 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1501–1.1530.
Federal Communications Commission DA 16-850
8
22. Invalidity. In the event that this Consent Decree in its entirety is rendered invalid by any
court of competent jurisdiction, it shall become null and void and may not be used in any manner in any
legal proceeding.
23. Subsequent Rule or Order. The Parties agree that if any provision of the Consent
Decree conflicts with any subsequent Rule or Order adopted by the Commission (except an Order
specifically intended to revise the terms of this Consent Decree to which TP-Link does not expressly
consent) that provision will be superseded by such Rule or Order.
24. Successors and Assigns. TP-Link agrees that the provisions of this Consent Decree shall
be binding on its successors, assigns, and transferees.
25. Final Settlement. The Parties agree and acknowledge that this Consent Decree shall
constitute a final settlement between the Parties with respect to the Investigation.
26. Modifications. This Consent Decree cannot be modified without the advance written
consent of both Parties.
27. Paragraph Headings. The headings of the paragraphs in this Consent Decree are
inserted for convenience only and are not intended to affect the meaning or interpretation of this Consent
Decree.
28. Authorized Representative. Each Party represents and warrants to the other that it has
full power and authority to enter into this Consent Decree. Each person signing this Consent Decree on
behalf of a Party hereby represents that he or she is fully authorized by the Party to execute this Consent
Decree and to bind the Party to its terms and conditions.
29. Counterparts. This Consent Decree may be signed in counterpart (including
electronically or by facsimile). Each counterpart, when executed and delivered, shall be an original, and
all of the counterparts together shall constitute one and the same fully executed instrument.
________________________________
Travis LeBlanc
Chief
Enforcement Bureau
________________________________
Date
________________________________
Lewis Wu
Executive Vice President
TP-Link USA Corporation
________________________________
Date