Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version

******************************************************** 
                      NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.

*****************************************************************




In the Matter of

Global Franchise Development Corp. d/b/a

Exotic Sportz,

Complainant,

v.

AT&T and Charter Communications, Inc.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

EB Docket No. 15-132

File No. EB-15-MD-004

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Adopted: July 16, 2015 Released: July 16, 2015

By the Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau:

On June 9, 2015, Global Franchise Development Corp. d/b/a Exotic Sportz (Global) filed with this Commission a complaint against AT&T Corp. (AT&T) and Charter Communications, Inc. (Charter) (collectively, Defendants) pursuant to section 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act). Defendants filed their answers to Global's Complaint on July 9, 2015.

On July 13, 2015, the parties filed a Stipulation seeking dismissal of the Complaint with prejudice on the ground that the parties have agreed to settle the dispute.

We are satisfied that granting the Stipulation in accordance with the parties' request will serve the public interest by promoting the private resolution of disputes and by eliminating the need for further expenditure of time and resources by the parties and the Commission.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 208, and the authority delegated in Sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.720-1.736 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.111, 0.311, 1.720-1.736, that the Stipulation is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 208, and the authority delegated in Sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.720-1.736 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.111, 0.311, 1.720-1.736, that the Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION



Christopher L. Killion

Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division

Enforcement Bureau