Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the Matter of
Cox Communications Hampton Roads, L.L.C.,
Complainant,
v.
Dominion Virginia Power,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Proceeding No. 15-22
File No. EB-15-MD-001
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Adopted: September 29, 2015 Released: October 1, 2015
By the Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau:
On January 22, 2015, Cox Communications Hampton Roads, L.L.C. , (Cox) filed with this Commission a complaint against Dominion Virginia Power (Dominion) pursuant to section 224 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act). Dominion filed a Response to Cox's Complaint on February 23, 2015. Cox filed a Reply on March 17, 2015.
On September 25, 2015, the parties filed a joint motion seeking dismissal of the Complaint with prejudice on the ground that the parties executed a confidential settlement agreement regarding this dispute on August 20, 2015. The Motion states that "[d]ismissal of the Complaint will serve the public interest by eliminating the need for further litigation and the expenditure of the associated time and resources of the parties and the Commission and will promote the private resolution of disputes."
We are satisfied that granting the Motion will serve the public interest by promoting the private resolution of disputes and by eliminating the need for further expenditure of time and resources by the parties and the Commission.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 224 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 224, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.1401 - 1.1424 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.111, 0.311, 1.1401 - 1.1424, that the Motion is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 224 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 224, and the authority delegated in Sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.1401-1.1424 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.111, 0.311, 1.1401-1.1424, that the Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Christopher L. Killion
Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division
Enforcement Bureau