Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the Matter of )
)
Fiber Technologies Networks, LLC, )
Complainant, )
Complainant, )
) Proceeding No. 14-227
v. ) File No. EB-14-MD-015
)
Duke Energy Indiana, Inc., )
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, and )
Duke Energy Progress, Inc., )
Respondents. )
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Adopted: October 5, 2015 Released: October 5, 2015
By the Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau:
1. On November 10, 2014, Fiber Technologies Networks, LLC (Fibertech)
filed a pole attachment complaint against Duke Energy Indiana, Inc.,
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, and Duke Energy Progress, Inc. (Duke)^
pursuant to Section 224 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended
(Act).^
2. On September 23, 2015, the parties filed a joint motion seeking
dismissal of the Complaint with prejudice on the ground that the
parties have reached a settlement resolving the issues raised in the
Complaint.^ The Motion states that dismissal "will serve the public
interest by eliminating the need for further litigation and the
expenditure of the associated time and resources of the parties and
the Commission and will promote the private resolution of disputes."^
3. We are satisfied that granting the Motion will serve the public
interest by promoting the private resolution of disputes and by
eliminating the need for further expenditure of time and resources by
the parties and the Commission.
4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 224
of the Act, 47 U.S.C. SS 154(i), 154(j), and 224, and the authority
delegated in sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.1401-1.1424 of the
Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. SS 0.111, 0.311, and 1.1401-1.1424, that
the Motion is GRANTED.
5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 224 of the
Act, 47 U.S.C. SS 154(i), 154(j), and 224, and the authority delegated
in Sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.1401-1.1424 of the Commission's rules,
47 C.F.R. SS 0.111, 0.311, and 1.1401-1.1424, that the Complaint is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Christopher L. Killion
Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division
Enforcement Bureau
^ Pole Attachment Complaint, File No. EB-14-MD-015, FCC Proceeding No.
14-227 (filed Nov. 7, 2014) (Complaint). On December 17, 2014, Duke filed
Response, and on January 6, 2015, Fibertech filed a Reply. Response to
Pole Attachment Complaint, File No. EB-14-MD-015, FCC Proceeding No.
14-227 (filed Dec. 17, 2014) (Response); Reply to Response to Pole
Attachment Complaint, File No. EB-14-MD-015, FCC Proceeding No. 14-227
(filed Jan. 6, 2015) (Reply).
^ 47 U.S.C. S 224.
^ Joint Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint, File No. EB-14-MD-015, FCC
Proceeding No. 14-227 (filed Sept. 23, 2015) (Motion).
^ Motion at 1-2, para. 3.
Federal Communications Commission DA 15-1088
2
Federal Communications Commission DA 15-1088