Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the Matter of Telava Wireless, Inc. Owner of Antenna Structure No.:
1050186 Hulett, GA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No.: EB-11-AT-0055 NAL/Acct. No.:
201232480004 FRN: 0015598162
FORFEITURE ORDER
Adopted: January 17, 2014 Released: January 17, 2014
By the Regional Director, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau:
I. INTRODUCTION
1. In this Forfeiture Order (Order), we issue a monetary forfeiture in
the amount of seven thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500) to Telava
Wireless, Inc. (Telava), owner of antenna structure number 1050186,
located in Hulett, Georgia (the Antenna Structure), for its willful
and repeated violation of Section 303(q) of the Communications Act of
1934, as amended (Act)^ and Section 17.51(a) of the Commission's rules
(Rules).^ The noted violations involved Telava's failure to exhibit
all red obstruction lighting on the Antenna Structure from sunset to
sunrise.
II. BACKGROUND
2. On April 4, 2012, the Enforcement Bureau's Atlanta Office (Atlanta
Office) issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order
(NAL) ^ ^ to Telava for violations of Section 303(q) of the Act and
Section 17.51(a) of the Rules. Telava submitted a response to the NAL
requesting cancellation of the proposed forfeiture, because "the
economic climate has left Telava in serious funding constraints
resulting to minimal allocated budgets."^ Telava also certified that
it had secured a maintenance vendor to repair the antenna structure
lighting during the week of April 30, 2012.^ Telava subsequently
stated that the lights on the Antenna Structure have been repaired.^
III. DISCUSSION
3. The proposed forfeiture amount in this case was assessed in accordance
with Section 503(b) of the Act,^ Section 1.80 of the Rules,^ and the
Forfeiture Policy Statement.^ In examining Telava's response, Section
503(b)(2)(E) of the Act requires that the Commission take into account
the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violation and,
with respect to the violator, the degree of culpability, any history
of prior offenses, ability to pay, and other such matters as justice
may require.^ As discussed below, we have considered Telava's response
in light of these statutory factors, and find that a reduction of the
forfeiture to $7,500 based on inability to pay is warranted.
4. First, we affirm the NAL's finding that Telava violated Section 303(q)
of the Act and Section 17.51(a) of the Rules. Section 303(q) of the
Act states that antenna structure owners shall maintain the painting
and lighting of antenna structures as prescribed by the Commission.^
Section 17.51(a) of the Rules requires all red obstruction lighting to
be exhibited from sunset to sunrise unless otherwise specified.^ As
discussed in the NAL, an agent from the Atlanta Office observed a
light outage on the Antenna Structure on May 31, 2011, and later
discovered from electricity usage information contained in Telava's
electric bills that the outage had been ongoing since at least April
2010^ until it was repaired on or around August 30, 2012.^ Thus,
based on the undisputed evidence before us, we find that Telava
willfully and repeatedly failed to exhibit required red obstruction
lighting on the Antenna Structure in violation of Section 303(q) of
the Act and Section 17.51(a) of the Rules.^
5. Although Telava does not deny the violations, it nevertheless requests
cancellation of the proposed forfeiture based on its inability to pay.
With regard to an individual or entity's inability to pay claim, the
Commission has determined that, in general, gross revenues are the
best indicator of an ability to pay a forfeiture.^ Based on a review
of the financial documentation provided by Telava, we do not find
sufficient grounds to cancel the proposed forfeiture, but we reduce it
to $7,500. However, we caution Telava that a party's inability to pay
is only one factor in our forfeiture calculation analysis, and is not
dispositive.^ We have previously rejected inability to pay claims in
cases of repeated or otherwise egregious violations.^ Therefore,
future violations of this kind may result in significantly higher
forfeitures that may not be reduced due to Telava's financial
circumstances.
IV. ORDERING CLAUSES
6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.111, 0.204,
0.311, 0.314, and 1.80(f)(4) of the Commission's rules, Telava
Wireless, Inc. IS LIABLE FOR A MONETARY FORFEITURE in the amount of
seven thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500) for violations of Section
303(q) of the Act and Section 17.51(a) of the Commission's rules.^
7. Payment of the forfeiture shall be made in the manner provided for in
Section 1.80 of the Rules within thirty (30) calendar days after the
release date of this Forfeiture Order.^ If the forfeiture is not paid
within the period specified, the case may be referred to the U.S.
Department of Justice for enforcement of the forfeiture pursuant to
Section 504(a) of the Act.^ Telava Wireless, Inc. shall send
electronic notification of payment to SCR-Response@fcc.gov on the date
said payment is made. The payment must be made by check or similar
instrument, wire transfer, or credit card, and must include the
NAL/Account number and FRN referenced above. Regardless of the form of
payment, a completed FCC Form 159 (Remittance Advice) must be
submitted.^ When completing the FCC Form 159, enter the Account Number
in block number 23A (call sign/other ID) and enter the letters "FORF"
in block number 24A (payment type code). Below are additional
instructions you should follow based on the form of payment you
select:
* Payment by check or money order must be made payable to the order of
the Federal Communications Commission. Such payments (along with the
completed Form 159) must be mailed to Federal Communications
Commission, P.O. Box 979088, St. Louis, MO 63197-9000, or sent
via overnight mail to U.S. Bank - Government Lockbox #979088,
SL-MO-C2-GL, 1005 Convention Plaza, St. Louis, MO 63101.
* Payment by wire transfer must be made to ABA Number 021030004,
receiving bank TREAS/NYC, and Account Number 27000001. To complete
the wire transfer and ensure appropriate crediting of the wired funds,
a completed Form 159 must be faxed to U.S. Bank at (314) 418-4232 on
the same business day the wire transfer is initiated.
* Payment by credit card must be made by providing the required credit
card information on FCC Form 159 and signing and dating the Form 159
to authorize the credit card payment. The completed Form 159 must then
be mailed to Federal Communications Commission, P.O. Box 979088, St.
Louis, MO 63197-9000, or sent via overnight mail to U.S. Bank -
Government Lockbox #979088, SL-MO-C2-GL, 1005 Convention Plaza, St.
Louis, MO 63101.
8. Any request for making full payment over time under an installment
plan should be sent to: Chief Financial Officer--Financial
Operations, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W.,
Room 1-A625, Washington, D.C. 20554.^ If you have questions
regarding payment procedures, please contact the Financial Operations
Group Help Desk by phone, 1-877-480-3201, or by e-mail,
ARINQUIRIES@fcc.gov.
9. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Forfeiture Order shall be
sent by both First Class Mail and Certified Mail, Return Receipt
Requested, to Telava Wireless, Inc. at 353 Sacramento Street, Suite
1500, San Francisco, CA 94111.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Dennis P. Carlton
Regional Director
South Central Region
Enforcement Bureau
^ 47 U.S.C. S 303(q).
^ 47 C.F.R. S 17.51(a).
^ Telava Wireless, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and
Order, 27 FCC Rcd 3239 (Enf. Bur. 2012). A comprehensive recitation of the
facts and history of this case can be found in the NAL and is incorporated
herein by reference.
^ Letter from Boaz Yung, Executive Vice President, Telava Wireless, Inc.,
to Douglas Miller, District Director, Atlanta Office, South Central
Region, Enforcement Bureau, at 1 (May 3, 2012) (on file in EB-11-AT-0055)
(NAL Response).
^ NAL Response at 2.
^ Letter from Boaz Yung, Executive Vice President, Telava Wireless, Inc.,
to Douglas Miller, District Director, Atlanta Office, South Central
Region, Enforcement Bureau, at 1 (Aug. 30, 2012) (on file in
EB-11-AT-0055).
^ 47 U.S.C. S 503(b).
^ 47 C.F.R. S 1.80.
^ The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section
1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and
Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recons. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999)
(Forfeiture Policy Statement).
^ 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(2)(E).
^ 47 U.S.C. S 303(q).
^ 47 C.F.R. S 17.51(a).
^ NAL, 27 FCC Rcd at 3241.
^ See supra note 6.
^ 47 U.S.C. S 303(q); 47 C.F.R. S 17.51(a).
^ See PJB Communications of Virginia, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 7 FCC Rcd
2088, 2089 (1992) (forfeiture not deemed excessive where it represented
approximately 2.02 percent of the violator's gross revenues); Local Long
Distance, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 16 FCC Rcd 24385 (2000) (forfeiture not
deemed excessive where it represented approximately 7.9 percent of the
violator's gross revenues); Hoosier Broadcasting Corporation, Forfeiture
Order, 15 FCC Rcd 8640 (2002) (forfeiture not deemed excessive where it
represented approximately 7.6 percent of the violator's gross revenues).
^ See 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(2)(E) (requiring Commission to take into account
the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violation and, with
respect to the violator, the degree of culpability, any history of prior
offenses, ability to pay, and such other matters as justice may require).
^ Kevin W. Bondy, Forfeiture Order, 26 FCC Rcd 7840 (Enf. Bur., Western
Region 2011) (holding that violator's repeated acts of malicious and
intentional interference outweigh evidence concerning his ability to pay)
(petition for reconsideration pending); Hodson Broadcasting Corp.,
Forfeiture Order, 24 FCC Rcd 13699 (Enf. Bur. 2009) (holding that
permittee's continued operation at variance with its construction permit
constituted an intentional and continuous violation, which outweighed
permittee's evidence concerning its ability to pay the proposed
forfeitures).
^ 47 U.S.C. SS 303(q), 503(b); 47 C.F.R. SS 0.111, 0.204, 0.311, 0.314,
1.80(f)(4), 17.51(a).
^ 47 C.F.R. S 1.80.
^ 47 U.S.C. S 504(a).
^ An FCC Form 159 and detailed instructions for completing the form may be
obtained at http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form159/159.pdf.
^ See 47 C.F.R. S 1.1914.
Federal Communications Commission DA 14-58
4
Federal Communications Commission DA 14-58