Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
Frontier West Virginia Inc., Complainant, v. Appalachian Power Company and
Wheeling Power Company, Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No.
EB-12-MD-004
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Adopted: February 12, 2014 Released: February 12, 2014
By the Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau:
1. On June 22, 2012, the above-named complainant (Frontier) filed with
the Commission a pole attachment complaint^ against Appalachian Power
Company and Wheeling Power Company (collectively, AEP) pursuant to
Section 224 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act),^ and
Sections 1.1401 et seq. of the Commission's rules (Complaint).^ On
August 17, 2012, AEP served its response to the Complaint.^ On
November 1, 2012, the Public Service Commission of West Virginia (PSC)
filed a Petition to Intervene and a Motion to Dismiss or Remand,
noting that on March 2, 2012, AEP filed a complaint against Frontier
with the PSC (PSC Complaint).^ On March 25, 2013, the Commission's
Enforcement Bureau held the Complaint in abeyance pending resolution
of the PSC Complaint.^
2. On January 31, 2014, Frontier and AEP filed a Joint Motion for
Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice, requesting that the Complaint be
dismissed with prejudice (Joint Motion).^ In the Joint Motion, the
parties state that they have entered into a settlement agreement
resolving the Complaint and the PSC Complaint, and that on November
19, 2013 the PSC entered an order approving the parties' settlement
agreement and dismissing the PSC Complaint with prejudice.^
3. We are satisfied that granting the Joint Motion will serve the public
interest by promoting the private resolution of disputes, eliminating
the need for further litigation, and conserving the resources of the
parties and this Commission.
4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), and
224 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. SS 151,
154(i), 154(j), and 224, and the authority delegated in Sections
0.111, 0.311, and 1.1401-1.1418 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.
SS 0.111, 0.311, and 1.1401-1.1418, that the Joint Motion is GRANTED,
and that this proceeding is DISMISSED with prejudice.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Rosemary H. McEnery
Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division
Enforcement Bureau
^ Pole Attachment Complaint, File No. EB-12-MD-004 (filed June 22, 2012).
^ 47 U.S.C. S 224.
^ 47 C.F.R. SS 1.1404-1.1418.
^ Response to Pole Attachment Complaint, File No. EB-12-MD-004 (filed Aug.
17, 2012).
^ Petition to Intervene of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia
and a Motion to Dismiss or Remand, File No. EB-12-MD-004 (filed Nov. 1,
2012).
^ Letter from Rosemary McEnery, Acting Chief, Market Disputes Resolution
Division, to Christopher Huther and Claire Evans, Wiley Rein LLP, Counsel
for Complainant, and Eric Langley, Balch & Bingham LLP, Counsel for AEP,
File No. EB-12-MD-004 (dated Mar. 25, 2013).
^ Joint Motion for Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice, File No.
EB-12-MD-004 (filed Jan. 31, 2014).
^ Id. at 2, paras. 5-6.
(...continued from previous page)
(continued....)
Federal Communications Commission DA 14-188
2
Federal Communications Commission DA 14-188