Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version

******************************************************** 
                      NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.

*****************************************************************



                                   Before the

                       Federal Communications Commission

                             Washington, D.C. 20554

   In the Matter of Equity Communications LP Licensee of Station WMID and
   Owner of Antenna Structure Number 1046225 Atlantic City, New Jersey ) ) )
   ) ) ) ) ) File No.: EB-10-PA-0312; EB-FIELDNER-12-00004385 NAL/Acct. No.:
   201232400001 FRN: 0003747813  Facility ID: 1307




                                Forfeiture Order

   Adopted: September 17, 2014 Released: September 17, 2014

   By the Regional Director, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau:

   I. Introduction

    1. We impose a penalty of $20,000 against Equity Communications LP
       (Equity) for failure to properly paint its antenna structure or
       enclose its antenna structure within an effective locked fence or
       other enclosure. Public safety is at risk when antenna structures are
       not properly illuminated and the Commission's fencing rules protect
       the public by limiting access to areas with a high potential for
       radiofrequency exposure. Equity does not deny that the paint on its
       structure was faded and chipped or that the gate on the southeast side
       of the structure was unlocked, but requests reduction of the
       forfeiture because it had strobe lights installed on the tower and
       repaired the gate as quickly as practicable and it has a history of
       compliance with the Commission's rules. We find these arguments
       provide insufficient basis to reduce the forfeiture and deny Equity's
       request.

    2. Specifically, we issue a monetary forfeiture to Equity, licensee of AM
       Station WMID and owner of antenna structure number 1046225 (Antenna
       Structure), in Atlantic City,  New Jersey, for willfully and
       repeatedly violating Section 303(q) of the Communications Act of 1934,
       as amended (Act)^ and Sections 17.50(a) and 73.49  of the Commission's
       rules (Rules) for failure to repaint the Antenna Structure as often as
       necessary to maintain good visibility and enclose the Antenna
       Structure within an effective locked fence or other enclosure.^

   II. Background

    3. On March 5, 2010, agents from the Enforcement Bureau's Philadelphia
       Office (Philadelphia Office) inspected the Antenna Structure located
       in Atlantic City, New Jersey. According to the Antenna Structure
       Registration (ASR) database, the Antenna Structure was required to be
       painted and lit.^ The agents observed that the paint on the Antenna
       Structure was faded and chipped, significantly reducing the Antenna
       Structure's visibility. The agents also found that an unlocked gate on
       the southeast side of the Antenna Structure allowed unrestricted
       access to the Antenna Structure, which had radio frequency potential
       at its base.^ The agents contacted the Antenna Structure owner and
       locked the gate before leaving the site.

    4. On April 7, 2010, the Philadelphia Office issued a Notice of Violation
       (NOV) to Equity for failing to clean and repaint the Antenna Structure
       as required to maintain good visibility, in violation of Section
       17.50(a) of the Rules, and for failing to enclose the Antenna
       Structure within an effective locked fence, in violation of Section
       73.49  of the Rules.^

    5. On May 6, 2010, the Philadelphia Office received Equity's response to
       the NOV.^ In the letter, Equity stated that it inspects the Antenna
       Structure several times per year and had been planning to address the
       faded and chipped paint issue for some time.^ Equity further stated
       that the Antenna Structure would be brought into compliance with the
       Rules by August 15, 2010, either by repainting the Antenna Structure
       or installing white strobe lighting.^ Equity also stated that, during
       its own site visits, it had never seen the Antenna Structure's gate
       left unlocked. Equity noted that several tenants lease space on the
       Antenna Structure and each of them have a key for the locks.^

    6. On November 16, 2010, agents from the Philadelphia Office re-inspected
       the Antenna Structure to verify that the violations from the NOV had
       been corrected. The agents found that Equity had neither repainted the
       Antenna Structure nor installed strobe lights. The agents also found
       the gate on the northeast side of the Antenna Structure was unlocked,
       allowing unrestricted access to the Antenna Structure, which had radio
       frequency potential at its base. The agents immediately informed
       Equity's President and General Manager (President) about the open
       gate, which agents were unable to lock before leaving the site.

    7. On November 17, 2010, the agents returned to the Antenna Structure
       site and found that the gate on the northeast side of the Antenna
       Structure was still unlocked. The agent contacted Equity's President,
       who informed the agent that a new lock would be installed immediately.
       Later that day, Equity's President contacted the agent and reported
       that a new lock had been installed on the gate at the northeast side
       of the Antenna Structure.

    8. On December 8, 2010, agents from the Philadelphia Office again
       inspected the Antenna Structure with Equity's President and General
       Manager and Station WMID's Chief Engineer. The Antenna Structure still
       had not been repainted nor were strobe lights installed. The agent
       used the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) In-Service Aviation
       Orange Tolerance Chart (Tolerance Chart)^ to compare the paint on the
       Antenna Structure with the standard in the Tolerance Chart. The paint
       on the Antenna Structure failed the Tolerance Chart test. On January
       7, 2011, Station WMID's Chief Engineer reported that Equity had
       installed white strobe lighting in lieu of paint.

    9. On October 31, 2011, the Philadelphia Office issued a Notice of
       Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order  (NAL) ^ ^ to Equity for
       failure to repaint the Antenna Structure as often as necessary to
       maintain good visibility, in violation of Section 17.50(a) of the
       Rules and failure to enclose the Antenna Structure within an effective
       locked fence or enclosure, in violation of Section 73.49 of the Rules.
       Equity filed a response to the NAL on November 22, 2011. Equity does
       not dispute the findings in the NAL, but requests a reduction in the
       proposed forfeiture based on its immediate efforts to bring the
       Antenna Structure into compliance with the Rules and its overall
       history of compliance with the  Rules.^

   III. discussion

   10. The proposed forfeiture amount in this case was assessed in accordance
       with Section 503(b) of the Act,^ Section 1.80 of the Rules,^ and the
       Forfeiture Policy Statement.^ In examining Equity's response, Section
       503(b)(2)(E) of the Act requires that the Commission take into account
       the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violation and,
       with respect to the violator, the degree of culpability, any history
       of prior offenses, ability to pay, and other such matters as justice
       may require.^ As discussed below, we have fully considered Equity's
       response to the NAL in light of these statutory factors and find that
       reduction of the forfeiture is not warranted.

   11. We affirm the findings in the NAL regarding the faded and chipped
       paint on the Antenna Structure and the unlocked gates surrounding the
       Antenna Structure. As described above, agents from the Philadelphia
       Office found that the paint on the Antenna Structure was faded and
       chipped on March 5, 2010, November 16, 2010, and December 8, 2010, in
       violation of Section 17.50(a) of the Rules. Similarly, agents from the
       Philadelphia Office found that unlocked gates at the Antenna Structure
       site allowed unrestricted access to the base of the Antenna Structure
       from the southeast side on March 5, 2010, and from the northeast side
       on November 16 and 17, 2010, in violation of Section 73.49 of the
       Rules. Equity does not dispute these findings. Accordingly, we find
       that Equity willfully and repeatedly violated Sections 17.50(a) and
       73.49 of the Rules.

   12. We decline to reduce the base forfeitures or the upward adjustment
       based on Equity's claim that it "took immediate and substantial action
       to correct these violations upon notification by the Commission." As
       Equity recognized in its NAL Response, it is long-standing Commission
       policy that  corrective action taken to come into compliance with the
       Rules is expected, and such corrective action does not nullify or
       mitigate prior violations or associated forfeiture liability.^
       Moreover, contrary to Equity's claim, we find that its remedial
       actions with regard to the Antenna Structure were by no measure
       "immediate." Equity was first notified about the faded and chipped
       paint on March 5, 2010, but it was not until January 7, 2011, that the
       Station's Chief Engineer notified the agent that strobe lights were
       installed on the Antenna Structure in lieu of paint. We therefore
       affirm our finding in the NAL that Equity's actions reflected a
       deliberate disregard for the Rules and find that cancellation or
       reduction of the proposed forfeiture amount is not warranted on the
       basis of Equity's post-inspection remedial efforts.^

   13. We also deny Equity's request to reduce the forfeiture based on its
       history of compliance with the Rules. First, Equity received the NOV
       in 2002 for failing to maintain the paint on antenna structure number
       1046075 as required by Section 17.50(a) of the Rules and failing to
       notify the Commission of Equity's purchase of such antenna structure.^
       Second, in 2011, agents in the Philadelphia observed that Equity
       failed to maintain an effective locked fence around an antenna
       structure used in the operation of AM Station WCMC in Wildwood, New
       Jersey.^ For these reasons, we find that a reduction for history of
       compliance with the Rules is not warranted.

   IV. ordering clauses

   14. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act
       and Sections 0.111, 0.204, 0.311, 0.314, and 1.80(f)(4) of the Rules,
       Equity Communications, LP IS LIABLE FOR A MONETARY FORFEITURE in the
       amount of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) for violations of Section
       17.50(a) and 73.49 of the Commission's rules.^

   15. Payment of the forfeiture shall be made in the manner provided for in
       Section 1.80 of the Commission's rules within thirty (30) calendar
       days after the release date of this Forfeiture Order.^  If the
       forfeiture is not paid within the period specified, the case may be
       referred to the U.S. Department of Justice for enforcement of the
       forfeiture pursuant to Section 504(a) of the Act.^  Equity
       Communications, LP, shall send electronic notification of payment to
       NER-Response@fcc.gov on the date said payment is made.

   16. The payment must be made by check or similar instrument, wire
       transfer, or credit card, and must include the NAL/Account Number and
       FRN referenced above. Regardless of the form of payment, a completed
       FCC Form 159 (Remittance Advice) must be submitted.^ When completing
       the FCC Form 159, enter the Account Number in block number 23A (call
       sign/other ID) and enter the letters "FORF" in block number 24A
       (payment type code).  Below are additional instructions you should
       follow based on the form of payment you select:

     * Payment by check or money order must be made payable to the order of
       the Federal Communications Commission.  Such payments (along with the
       completed Form 159) must be mailed to Federal Communications
       Commission, P.O. Box 979088, St. Louis, MO 63197-9000, or sent
       via overnight mail to U.S. Bank - Government Lockbox #979088,
       SL-MO-C2-GL, 1005 Convention Plaza, St. Louis, MO 63101.

     * Payment by wire transfer must be made to ABA Number 021030004,
       receiving bank TREAS/NYC, and Account Number 27000001.  To complete
       the wire transfer and ensure appropriate crediting of the wired funds,
       a completed Form 159 must be faxed to U.S. Bank at (314) 418-4232 on
       the same business day the wire transfer is initiated.

     * Payment by credit card must be made by providing the required credit
       card information on FCC Form 159 and signing and dating the Form 159
       to authorize the credit card payment. The completed Form 159 must then
       be mailed to Federal Communications Commission, P.O. Box 979088, St.
       Louis, MO 63197-9000, or sent via overnight mail to U.S. Bank -
       Government Lockbox #979088, SL-MO-C2-GL, 1005 Convention Plaza, St.
       Louis, MO 63101.

   17. Any request for full payment over time under an installment plan
       should be sent to:  Chief Financial Officer--Financial Operations,
       Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 1-A625,
       Washington, D.C.  20554.^  If you have questions regarding payment
       procedures, please contact the Financial Operations Group Help Desk by
       phone, 1-877-480-3201, or by e-mail, [1]ARINQUIRIES@fcc.gov.

   18. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Forfeiture Order shall be
       sent by both First Class Mail and Certified Mail, Return Receipt
       Requested, to Equity Communications, LP, 8025 Black Horse Pike, Suite
       100-102, West Atlantic City, New Jersey, 08232, and to its counsel,
       David D. Burns, Latham & Watkins LLP, 555 Eleventh Street, NW, Suite
       1000, Washington, DC 20004.

   FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

   G. Michael Moffitt

   Regional Director, Northeast Region

   Enforcement Bureau

   ^ 47 U.S.C. S 303(q).

   ^ 47 U.S.C. SS 17.50(a), 73.49.

   ^ Pursuant to Section 17.21 of the Rules, antenna structures shall be
   painted and lit when they exceed 60.96 meters in height above ground. 47
   C.F.R. S 17.21. The Antenna Structure is 106 meters in height above
   ground.

   ^ Section 73.49 of the Rules states that "antenna towers having radio
   frequency potential at the base must be enclosed with effective locked
   fences or other enclosures." 47 C.F.R. S 73.49. The fence surrounding the
   Antenna Structure has two gates for access. One gate is on the southeast
   side and the other gate in on the northeast side. The gate that was found
   unlocked on March 5, 2010 was the gate on the southeast side and agents
   observed the lock hanging on the fence.

   ^ See Equity Communications LP, Notice of Violation, V201032400035 (rel.
   April 7, 2010); see also 47 C.F.R. SS 17.50, 73.49.

   ^ See Letter from Gary Fisher, President, Equity Communications LP, to
   Gene Stanbro, District Director, Philadelphia Office (May 6, 2010) (on
   file in EB-FIELDNER-12-00004385).

   ^ Id. at 1.

   ^ Id. Antenna structure owners may, if approved by the Federal Aviation
   Administration (FAA), install white strobe lighting in lieu of paint. On
   February 15, 2011, Equity received this approval from the FAA.

   ^ Id. at 2.

   ^ The Color Tolerance Charts from the FAA provide a method for visually
   comparing the paint on the tower against the chart colors, which reflect
   the FAA's paint color specifications. These Color Tolerance Charts are
   based on the recommendations contained in National Bureau of Standards
   Report NBSIR 75-663, COLOR REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MARKING OF OBSTRUCTIONS,
   by R.L. Booker.

   ^Equity Communications, LP,  Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
   and Order, 26 FCC Rcd 15187 (Enf. Bur. 2011).

   ^ Letter from Gary Fisher, President, Equity Communications L.P., to Gene
   Stanbro, then District Director of the Philadelphia Office (Nov. 22, 2011)
   (on file in EB-FIELDNER-12-00004385) (NAL Response).

   ^ 47 U.S.C. S 503(b).

   ^ 47 C.F.R. S 1.80.

   ^ The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section
   1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and
   Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recons. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999)
   (Forfeiture Policy Statement).

   ^ 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(2)(E).

   ^ See, e.g., Argos Net, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 28 FCC Rcd 1126 (Enf. Bur.
   2013) (finding that post-notification remedial efforts do not warrant
   mitigation of a forfeiture) (citing Int'l Broad. Corp., Order on Review,
   25 FCC Rcd 1538 (2010)).

   ^ Contrary to Equity's claim (NAL Response at 4), the Commission has
   issued upward adjustments based on a subject's deliberate disregard of the
   Rules in a wide range of cases, not just cases involving unlicensed radio
   station operation. See e.g., Iglesia Cristiana Ebenezer, Inc., Notice of
   Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 28 FCC Rcd 14642 (Enf. Bur. 2013)
   (assessing upward adjustment on FM Translator licensee for deliberate
   disregard of the Rules for continuing to operate its station at an
   unauthorized location even after it was specifically directed by FCC
   agents to cease the unauthorized operation); see also Fellowship World,
   Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 28 FCC Rcd 10246 (Enf.
   Bur. 2013) (assessing upward adjustment on broadcast licensee for
   operating its transmitter at an unauthorized location).

   ^ Equity Communications, LP, Notice of Violation (rel. Aug. 15, 2002) (on
   file in EB-02-PA-287).

   ^ Equity Communications, LP,  Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
   and Order, 27 FCC Rcd 8031 (Enf. Bur. 2012). Section 504(c) of the Act, 47
   C.F.R. S 504(c), prohibits the use of a non-final, non-adjudicated
   forfeiture proceeding in any other proceeding before the Commission. The
   Commission, however, may consider the underlying facts associated with
   non-final, non-adjudicated forfeiture proceedings. See Forfeiture Policy
   Statement, 12 FCC Rcd at 17102-03, paras. 32-35. Such facts may be used to
   demonstrate "a pattern of non-complaint behavior against a licensee in a
   subsequent renewal, forfeiture, transfer, or other proceeding." Id. at
   17103, para. 34; see also [2]Paulino Bernal Evangelism, Memorandum Opinion
   and Order, 21 FCC Rcd 9532, 9535, para. 11 (Enf. Bur. 2006) (in
   considering whether a history of compliance exists, the Commission may
   consider violations occurring in cases where there has been no final
   determination), modified on other grounds, Order on Review, [3]23 FCC Rcd
   15959 (Enf. Bur. 2006).

   ^ 47 U.S.C. S 503(b); 47 C.F.R. SS 0.111, 0.204, 0.311, 0.314, 1.80(f)(4),
   17.50(a), 73.49.

   ^ 47 C.F.R. S 1.80.

   ^ 47 U.S.C. S 504(a).

   ^ An FCC Form 159 and detailed instructions for completing the form may be
   obtained at http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form159/159.pdf.

   ^ See 47 C.F.R. S 1.1914.

   (Continued from previous page)

   (continued....)

   Federal Communications Commission DA 14-1341

   2

   Federal Communications Commission DA 14-1341

References

   Visible links
   1. mailto:ARINQUIRIES@fcc.gov
   2. http://web2.westlaw.com/find/default.wl?mt=Westlaw&db=0004493&tc=-1&rp=%2ffind%2fdefault.wl&findtype=Y&ordoc=2028954421&serialnum=2010154553&vr=2.0&fn=_top&sv=Split&tf=-1&referencepositiontype=S&pbc=FC22AE92&referenceposition=9535&rs=WLW13.10
   3. http://web2.westlaw.com/find/default.wl?mt=Westlaw&db=0004493&tc=-1&rp=%2ffind%2fdefault.wl&findtype=Y&ordoc=2028954421&serialnum=2017369253&vr=2.0&fn=_top&sv=Split&tf=-1&pbc=FC22AE92&rs=WLW13.10