Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the Matter of Iglesia Cristiana Ebenezer, Inc. Licensee of Translator
Station K295BF, Greenville, Texas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No.:
EB-FIELDSCR-13-00008542 NAL/Acct. No.: 201432500001 FRN: 0013743158
Facility ID No.: 156869
NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FOFEITURE
Adopted: October 24, 2013 Released: October 25, 2013
By the District Director, Dallas Office, South Central Region,
Enforcement Bureau:
I. INTRODUCTION
1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (NAL), we find
that Iglesia Cristiana Ebenezer, Inc. (Iglesia), licensee of FM
Translator Station K295BF, in Greenville, Texas (Station K295BF),
apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), and Section 74.1251(a)
of the Commission's rules (Rules),^ by operating Station K295BF at an
unauthorized location. We conclude that Iglesia is apparently liable
for a forfeiture in the amount of eight thousand dollars ($8,000).
II. BACKGROUND
2. Iglesia's FM Translator Station K295BF is authorized to rebroadcast
the signal of low power FM Station KYLP-LP.^ Further, in 2011, Station
K295BF was authorized to operate at coordinates 33-00-21.9 N
096-17-32.9 W, in Royse City, Texas. On June 15, 2011, in response to
a complaint that Station K295BF was operating at an unauthorized
location, agents from the Enforcement Bureau's Dallas Office (Dallas
Office) observed that Station K295BF was operating at coordinates
32-58-07.4 N 096-20-30.6 W (in Royse City), which was at variance with
its authorization. On the same day, the agents informed Iglesia's
owner of the discrepancy and directed the licensee to cease operating
Station K295BF at the unauthorized location.
3. On June 24, 2011, Iglesia submitted an FCC Form 349 application
(Application) to obtain authority to change its community of license
from Greenville to Royse City, Texas, and to move Station K295BF to a
new location (i.e., at coordinates 32-58-07.4 N 096-20-30.6 W, in
Royse City).^ The FCC's Media Bureau accepted the Application for
filing on June 27, 2011. In addition, on July 8, 2011, Iglesia filed a
request for a Special Temporary Authorization (STA) with the Media
Bureau to obtain authority to move Station K295BF to the new
location.^ On July 11, 2011, the Media Bureau, however, denied
Iglesia's STA request because the proposed STA operation would result
in a substantial extension of its coverage area.^ Despite denial of
its STA, Iglesia continued to operate Station K295BF at the
unauthorized location. During follow up inspections on March 7 and 19,
2012, an agent from the Dallas Office confirmed that Station K295BF
was still operating at the unauthorized location. Several months
later, during a subsequent investigation, the agents discovered that
Station K295BF apparently returned to its original, authorized
location sometime in November 2012. However, for approximately 17
months, while Iglesia's Application was pending, Iglesia apparently
continued to operate the transmitter at the unauthorized location.
4. On June 17, 2013, the Media Bureau granted Iglesia's Application to
move its transmitter to the new location. In September 2013, the
Dallas Office confirmed that Station K295BF was operating its
transmitter at the new (authorized) location.
III. DISCUSSION
5. Section 503(b) of the Act provides that any person who willfully or
repeatedly fails to comply substantially with the terms and conditions
of any license, or willfully or repeatedly fails to comply with any of
the provisions of the Act or of any rule, regulation, or order issued
by the Commission thereunder, shall be liable for a forfeiture
penalty.^ Section 312(f)(1) of the Act defines "willful" as the
"conscious and deliberate commission or omission of [any] act,
irrespective of any intent to violate" the law.^ The legislative
history to Section 312(f)(1) of the Act clarifies that this definition
of willful applies to both Sections 312 and 503(b) of the Act,^ and
the Commission has so interpreted the term in the Section 503(b)
context.^ The Commission may also assess a forfeiture for violations
that are merely repeated, and not willful.^ The term "repeated" means
the commission or omission of such act more than once or for more than
one day.^
A. Operation at an Unauthorized Location
6. The evidence in this case establishes that Iglesia violated Section
301 of the Act and Section 74.1251(a) of the Rules. Section 301 of the
Act states that no person shall use or operate any apparatus for the
transmission of energy or communications or signals by radio within
the United States, except under and in accordance with the Act and
with a license granted under the provisions of the Act.^ In addition,
Section 74.1251(a) of the Rules states that "[n]o change, either
mechanical or electrical . . . may be made in FM translator or booster
apparatus which has been certificated by the Commission without prior
authority of the Commission."^
7. Pursuant to Iglesia's license as of 2011, FM Translator Station K295BF
was authorized to operate at coordinates 33-00-21.9 N 096-17-32.9 W in
Royse City, Texas. The record evidence, however, shows that Iglesia
was engaged in unauthorized operation by operating Station K295BF at a
different location (i.e., at coordinates 32-58-07.4 N 096-20-30.6 W,
in Royse City). The Dallas Office agents confirmed this fact on June
15, 2011, and specifically directed Iglesia to cease operation from
the unauthorized location, which Iglesia did not do. Although Iglesia
later submitted a license modification Application (i.e., by filing an
FCC Form 349) to change its community of license and to obtain
authorization to operate the transmitter at the new location, it
continued to operate Station K295BF at the unauthorized location
before receiving Commission approval. A licensee simply cannot operate
in conformity with its license modification application based on the
assumption that the application will later be granted.^ Until such
modification application has been granted, a licensee is expected to
operate in strict conformity with its current license authorization,
unless it has been granted special temporary authority in the
interim.^ Here, although Iglesia applied for an STA on July 8, 2011,
to permit operations at a new location while its Application remained
pending, the FCC's Media Bureau denied the STA application on July 11,
2011, because the proposed STA operation would result in a substantial
extension of Station K295BF's coverage area. In spite of the denial of
its request for an STA and the pendency of its Application, Iglesia
continued to operate Station K295BF at the unauthorized location.^
Based on the evidence before us, we find that Iglesia apparently
willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act and Section
74.1251(a) of the Rules by operating Station K295BF at an unauthorized
location.^
B. Proposed Forfeiture
8. Pursuant to the Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Section
1.80 of the Rules, the base forfeiture amount for construction or
operation at an unauthorized location is $4,000.^ In assessing the
monetary forfeiture amount, we must also take into account the
statutory factors set forth in Section 503(b)(2)(E) of the Act, which
include the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the
violations, and with respect to the violator, the degree of
culpability, any history of prior offenses, ability to pay, and other
such matters as justice may require.^ In doing so, we find that the
facts and circumstances of this case justify a $4,000 upward
adjustment of the base forfeiture amount to take into account
Iglesia's deliberate disregard for the Commission's authority on two
occasions: first, by continuing to operate Station K295BF at an
unauthorized location even after it was specifically directed by FCC
agents to cease the unauthorized operation; and, second, by continuing
to operate the Station at an unauthorized location despite denial of
its STA request and also before its Application was granted.^
Applying the Forfeiture Policy Statement, Section 1.80 of the Rules,
and the statutory factors to the instant case, we conclude that
Iglesia is apparently liable for a total forfeiture in the amount of
$8,000 for operation at an unauthorized location.
IV. ORDERING CLAUSES
9. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.111, 0.204,
0.311, 0.314, and 1.80 of the Commission's rules, Iglesia Cristiana
Ebenezer, Inc. is hereby NOTIFIED of this APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A
FORFEITURE in the amount of eight thousand dollars ($8,000) for
violations of Section 301 of the Act and Section 74.1251(a) of the
Rules.^
10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.80 of the
Commission's rules, within thirty (30) calendar days of the release
date of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, Iglesia
Cristiana Ebenezer, Inc. SHALL PAY the full amount of the proposed
forfeiture or SHALL FILE a written statement seeking reduction or
cancellation of the proposed forfeiture.
11. Payment of the forfeiture must be made by check or similar instrument,
wire transfer, or credit card, and must include the NAL/Account Number
and FRN referenced above. Iglesia Cristiana Ebenezer, Inc. shall also
send electronic notification on the date said payment is made to
[1]SCR-Response@fcc.gov. Regardless of the form of payment, a
completed FCC Form 159 (Remittance Advice) must be submitted.^ When
completing the FCC Form 159, enter the Account Number in block number
23A (call sign/other ID) and enter the letters "FORF" in block number
24A (payment type code). Below are additional instructions you
should follow based on the form of payment you select:
* Payment by check or money order must be made payable to the order of
the Federal Communications Commission. Such payments (along with the
completed Form 159) must be mailed to Federal Communications
Commission, P.O. Box 979088, St. Louis, MO 63197-9000, or sent
via overnight mail to U.S. Bank - Government Lockbox #979088,
SL-MO-C2-GL, 1005 Convention Plaza, St. Louis, MO 63101.
* Payment by wire transfer must be made to ABA Number 021030004,
receiving bank TREAS/NYC, and Account Number 27000001. To complete
the wire transfer and ensure appropriate crediting of the wired funds,
a completed Form 159 must be faxed to U.S. Bank at (314) 418-4232 on
the same business day the wire transfer is initiated.
* Payment by credit card must be made by providing the required credit
card information on FCC Form 159 and signing and dating the Form 159
to authorize the credit card payment. The completed Form 159 must then
be mailed to Federal Communications Commission, P.O. Box 979088, St.
Louis, MO 63197-9000, or sent via overnight mail to U.S. Bank -
Government Lockbox #979088, SL-MO-C2-GL, 1005 Convention Plaza, St.
Louis, MO 63101.
12. Any request for making full payment over time under an installment
plan should be sent to: Chief Financial Officer--Financial
Operations, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W.,
Room 1-A625, Washington, D.C. 20554.^ If you have questions
regarding payment procedures, please contact the Financial Operations
Group Help Desk by phone, 1-877-480-3201, or by e-mail,
ARINQUIRIES@fcc.gov.
13. The written statement seeking reduction or cancellation of the
proposed forfeiture, if any, must include a detailed factual statement
supported by appropriate documentation and affidavits pursuant to
Sections 1.16 and 1.80(f)(3) of the Rules.^ Mail the written statement
to Federal Communications Commission, Enforcement Bureau, South
Central Region, Dallas Office, 9330 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1170, Dallas,
Texas, 75243, and include the NAL/Acct. No. referenced in the caption.
Iglesia Cristiana Ebenezer, Inc. also shall e-mail the written
response to [2]SCR-Response@fcc.gov.
14. The Commission will not consider reducing or canceling a forfeiture in
response to a claim of inability to pay unless the petitioner submits:
(1) federal tax returns for the most recent three-year period; (2)
financial statements prepared according to generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP); or (3) some other reliable and objective
documentation that accurately reflects the petitioner's current
financial status. Any claim of inability to pay must specifically
identify the basis for the claim by reference to the financial
documentation submitted.
15. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability
for Forfeiture shall be sent by both Certified Mail, Return Receipt
Requested, and First Class Mail to Iglesia Cristiana Ebenezer, Inc.
at 3207 Forest Lane, Garland, Texas 75042.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
James D. Wells
District Director
Dallas Office
South Central Region
Enforcement Bureau
^ File No. EB-FIELDSCR-13-00008542 incorporates the contents of File No.
EB-11-DL-0053, the previous file number for this case.
^ 47 U.S.C. S 301; 47 C.F.R. S 74.1251(a).
^ See License File No. BLFT-20070423ABX.
^ See License File No. BPFT-20110624ACD.
^ See License File No. BSTA-20110708AAA.
^ See Letter from Charles N. Miller, Engineer, Audio Division, Media
Bureau, to Dan J. Alpert, Counsel for Iglesia Cristiana Ebeneezer, Inc.
(July 11, 2011) (on file in EB-FIELDSCR-13-00008542). To remedy the
expansion in coverage area, the proposed STA operation power would need to
be significantly reduced, which would eliminate coverage in the current
community of license.
^ 47 U.S.C. S 503(b).
^ 47 U.S.C. S 312(f)(1).
^ H.R. Rep. No. 97-765, 97^th Cong. 2d Sess. 51 (1982) ("This provision
[inserted in Section 312] defines the terms `willful' and `repeated' for
purposes of section 312, and for any other relevant section of the act
(e.g., Section 503) . . . . As defined[,] . . . `willful' means that the
licensee knew that he was doing the act in question, regardless of whether
there was an intent to violate the law. `Repeated' means more than once,
or where the act is continuous, for more than one day. Whether an act is
considered to be `continuous' would depend upon the circumstances in each
case. The definitions are intended primarily to clarify the language in
Sections 312 and 503, and are consistent with the Commission's application
of those terms . . . .").
^ See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and
Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4388 (1991), recons. denied, 7 FCC Rcd 3454 (1992).
^ See, e.g., Callais Cablevision, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for
Monetary Forfeiture, 16 FCC Rcd 1359, 1362, para. 10 (2001) (Callais
Cablevision, Inc.) (proposing a forfeiture for, inter alia, a cable
television operator's repeated signal leakage).
^ Section 312(f)(2) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 312(f)(2), which also applies
to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of
the Act, provides that "[t]he term `repeated', when used with reference to
the commission or omission of any act, means the commission or omission of
such act more than once or, if such commission or omission is continuous,
for more than one day." See Callais Cablevision, Inc., 16 FCC Rcd at
1362.
^ 47 U.S.C. S 301.
^ 47 C.F.R. S 74.1251(a).
^ See Ace of Hearts Disc Jockey Service, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and
Order, 28 FCC Rcd 1095 (Enf. Bur. 2013).
^ See 47 U.S.C. S 301. See also J. Thomas Development of NM, Inc.,
Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for
Forfeiture, 27 FCC Rcd 10859 (Media Bur. 2012) (finding that licensee's
operations after license expired and without STA apparently violated
Section 301).
^ As the record reflects, the Dallas Office confirmed on March 7 and 9,
2012--more than eight months after FCC agents informed Iglesia of the
violation and ordered it to cease operating at the unauthorized
location--that Station K295BF was still operating at the unauthorized
location.
^ See Bay Broadcasting Corporation, 15 FCC Rcd 13613 (Enf. Bur. 2000)
(forfeiture issued for operating a translator station at unauthorized
location in violation of Section 74.1251).
^ The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section
1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and
Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997) (Forfeiture Policy Statement), recons.
denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. S 1.80.
^ 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(2)(E).
^ See, e.g., Nounone Lubin, Forfeiture Order, 26 FCC Rcd 7758 (Enf. Bur.
2011), aff'g, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 25 FCC Rcd
12654 (Enf. Bur. 2010) (proposing upward adjustment of the base forfeiture
amount because unlicensed operator previously was informed of the
violation).
^ 47 U.S.C. SS 301, 503(b); 47 C.F.R. SS 0.111, 0.204, 0.311, 0.314, 1.80,
74.1251(a).
^ An FCC Form 159 and detailed instructions for completing the form may be
obtained at http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form159/159.pdf.
^ See 47 C.F.R. S 1.1914.
^ 47 C.F.R. SS 1.16, 1.80(f)(3).
(...continued from previous page)
(continued....)
Federal Communications Commission DA 13-2053
3
Federal Communications Commission DA 13-2053
References
Visible links
1. mailto:SCR-Response@fcc.gov
2. mailto:SCR-Response@fcc.gov