Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version

******************************************************** 
                      NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.

*****************************************************************



   Before the

                       Federal Communications Commission

                             Washington, D.C. 20554


                           )                                
                                                            
                           )                                
     In the Matter of          File No.: EB-11-AT-0007      
                           )                                
     US Jetting, Inc.          NAL/Acct. No.: 201232480001  
                           )                                
     Alpharetta, Georgia       FRN: 0020688966              
                           )                                
                                                            
                           )                                



             NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE AND ORDER

   Adopted: January 20, 2012 Released: January 20, 2012

   By the District Director, Atlanta Office, South Central Region,
   Enforcement Bureau:

   I. INTRODUCTION

    1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (NAL),
       we find US Jetting, Inc. (US Jetting) apparently liable for a
       forfeiture in the amount of eight thousand four hundred dollars
       ($8,400) for its apparent willful and repeated violation of Section
       302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), and
       Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 15.201(b) of the Commission's rules (Rules).
       The noted apparent violations involve US Jetting's marketing of radio
       frequency devices in the United States prior to obtaining Commission
       authorization for such devices. Further, we order US Jetting to submit
       a statement signed under penalty of perjury by an officer or director
       of the company stating that it is no longer marketing unauthorized
       radio frequency devices in the United States.

   II. BACKGROUND

    2. On January 25, 2011, agents from the Enforcement Bureau's Atlanta
       Office (Atlanta Office), accompanied by US Jetting's President,
       inspected US Jetting's store in Alpharetta, Georgia in response to a
       complaint. The agents observed that US Jetting was marketing in the
       United States an intentional radiator with a US Jetting label but no
       FCC equipment authorization label. Specifically, US Jetting was
       marketing a wireless handheld remote controller for its high-pressure
       water jetting equipment. US Jetting's President admitted that: (a) the
       company assembled the device; (b) the device was not certified; and
       (c) the company had sold the device to end users. The agents verbally
       warned him that he was prohibited from selling the remaining inventory
       of the device. According to Commission records, the agents confirmed
       that the radiator, a wireless handheld remote controller for US
       Jetting's high-pressure water jetting equipment, had not been
       certified by the Commission.

    3. On March 10, 2011, the Atlanta Office issued a letter of inquiry (LOI)
       to US Jetting. The LOI directed US Jetting to respond to a series of
       questions regarding its apparent marketing of an intentional radiator
       prior to obtaining FCC authorization for the device. US Jetting
       responded to the LOI, admitting that it began manufacturing the
       wireless handheld remote controller in its Alpharetta facility in June
       2010, after the previous manufacturer discontinued manufacturing the
       device. US Jetting also stated that it discontinued manufacturing the
       device in February 2011. US Jetting admitted that it marketed about 75
       units of the device between 2009 and 2011 and that they were mostly
       sold to consumers of the US Jetting water jetting equipment.

   III. DISCUSSION

    4. Section 503(b) of the Act provides that any person who willfully or
       repeatedly fails to comply substantially with the terms and conditions
       of any license, or willfully or repeatedly fails to comply with any of
       the provisions of the Act or of any rule, regulation, or order issued
       by the Commission thereunder, shall be liable for a forfeiture
       penalty. Section 312(f)(1) of the Act defines willful as the
       "conscious and deliberate commission or omission of [any] act,
       irrespective of any intent to violate" the law. The legislative
       history to Section 312(f)(1) of the Act clarifies that this definition
       of willful applies to both Section 312 and 503(b) of the Act and the
       Commission has so interpreted the term in the Section 503(b) context.
       The Commission may also assess a forfeiture for violations that are
       merely repeated, and not willful. The term "repeated" means the
       commission or omission of such act more than once or for more than one
       day.

     A. Marketing of Devices Without the Required Commission Authorization

    5. Pursuant to Section 302(b) of the Act, "[n]o person shall manufacture,
       import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home electronic
       equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with
       regulations promulgated pursuant to this section." Section 15.201(b)
       of the Rules requires intentional radiators operating above 490 kHz,
       to be certificated by the Commission. For a device subject to
       certification, Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Rules provides that:

   Except as provided elsewhere in this section, no person shall sell or
   lease, or offer for sale or lease (including advertising for sale or
   lease), or import, ship or distribute for the purpose of selling or
   leasing or offering for sale or lease, any radio frequency device
   unless...in the case of a device subject to certification, such device has
   been authorized by the Commission...and is properly identified and
   labeled....

    6. On January 25, 2011, agents from the Atlanta Office observed US
       Jetting offering for sale a wireless handheld remote controller in its
       Alpharetta store. The device is an intentional radiator that emits RF
       energy on the frequency 315 MHz and thus must be certified by the
       Commission. US Jetting admitted that it began manufacturing the
       wireless handheld remote controller device in June 2010 and that it
       offered for sale and sold the device for a period of two years,
       lasting from 2009 until 2011. At the time of the inspection, US
       Jetting had not received an equipment authorization from the
       Commission for this device or any wireless handheld remote
       controllers. Based on the evidence before us, we find that US Jetting
       apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Act
       and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 15.201(b) of the Rules by marketing and
       selling unauthorized radio frequency devices.

     A. Proposed Forfeiture

    7. Pursuant to the Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Section
       1.80 of the Rules, the base forfeiture amount for the importation or
       marketing of unauthorized equipment is seven thousand dollars
       ($7,000). In assessing the monetary forfeiture amount, we must also
       take into account the statutory factors set forth in Section
       503(b)(2)(E) of the Act, which include the nature, circumstances,
       extent, and gravity of the violations, and with respect to the
       violator, the degree of culpability, any history of prior offenses,
       ability to pay, and other such matters as justice may require. Because
       US Jetting marketed and sold unauthorized radio frequency devices for
       a period of two years, we conclude an upward adjustment in forfeiture
       in the amount of $1,400 is appropriate. Applying the Forfeiture Policy
       Statement, Section 1.80, and the  statutory factors to the instant
       case, we conclude that US Jetting is apparently liable for a $8,400
       forfeiture for marketing one model of an unauthorized radio frequency
       device in the United States.

    8. We order US Jetting to submit a written statement pursuant to Section
       1.16 of the Rules signed under penalty of perjury by an officer or
       director of the company stating that it is no longer marketing the
       unauthorized wireless handheld controller and describing the
       disposition of the remaining inventory of the device. This statement
       must be provided to the Enforcement Bureau at the address listed in
       paragraph 13 within thirty (30) calendar days of the release date of
       this NAL.

   IV. ORDERING CLAUSES

    9. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the
       Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.111, 0.204,
       0.311, 0.314, and 1.80 of the Commission's rules,  US Jetting, Inc. is
       hereby NOTIFIED of its APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE in the
       amount of eight thousand four hundred dollars ($8,400) for violation
       of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 15.201(b) of
       the Commission's rules. 

   10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.80 of the
       Commission's rules within thirty (30) calendar days of the release
       date of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, US
       Jetting, Inc. SHALL PAY the full amount of the proposed forfeiture or
       SHALL FILE a written statement seeking reduction or cancellation of
       the proposed forfeiture.

   11. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that US Jetting, Inc. SHALL SUBMIT a written
       statement under penalty of perjury as described in paragraph 8 to the
       Enforcement Bureau Office listed in paragraph 13 within thirty (30)
       calendar days of the release date of this Notice of Apparent Liability
       for Forfeiture and Order.

   12. Payment of the forfeiture must be made by credit card, check or
       similar instrument, payable to the order of the Federal Communications
       Commission. The payment must include the Account Number and FRN
       referenced above. Payment by check or money order may be mailed to
       Federal Communications Commission, P.O. Box 979088, St. Louis, MO
       63197-9000. Payment by overnight mail may be sent to U.S. Bank -
       Government Lockbox #979088, SL-MO-C2-GL, 1005 Convention Plaza, St.
       Louis, MO 63101. Payment by wire transfer may be made to ABA Number
       021030004, receiving bank TREAS/NYC, and account number 27000001. For
       payment by credit card, an FCC Form 159 (Remittance Advice) must be
       submitted. When completing the FCC Form 159, enter the NAL/Account
       number in block number 23A (call sign/other ID), and enter the letters
       "FORF" in block number 24A (payment type code). Requests for full
       payment under an installment plan should be sent to:  Chief Financial
       Officer -- Financial Operations, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 1-A625,
       Washington, D.C. 20554.8   If you have questions regarding payment
       procedures, please contact the Financial Operations Group Help Desk at
       1-877-480-3201 or Email: ARINQUIRIES@fcc.gov. US Jetting shall send
       electronic notification on the date said payment is made to
       SCR-Response@fcc.gov.

   13. The written statement seeking reduction or cancellation of the
       proposed forfeiture, if any, must include a detailed factual statement
       supported by appropriate documentation and affidavits pursuant to
       Sections 1.80(f)(3) and 1.16 of the Rules. The written statement must
       be mailed to Federal Communications Commission, Enforcement Bureau,
       South Central Region, Atlanta Office, 3575 Koger Blvd; Suite 320,
       Duluth, GA 30096, and must include the NAL/Acct. No. referenced in the
       caption. The statement should also be emailed to SCR-Response@fcc.gov.

   14. The Commission will not consider reducing or canceling a forfeiture in
       response to a claim of inability to pay unless the petitioner submits:
       (1) federal tax returns for the most recent three-year period; (2)
       financial statements prepared according to generally accepted
       accounting practices (GAAP); or (3) some other reliable and objective
       documentation that accurately reflects the petitioner's current
       financial status. Any claim of inability to pay must specifically
       identify the basis for the claim by reference to the financial
       documentation submitted.

   15. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability
       for Forfeiture and Order shall be sent by both Certified Mail, Return
       Receipt Requested, and regular mail, to US Jetting, Inc. at 850
       McFarland Pkwy, Alpharetta, GA 30004.

   FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

   Douglas Miller

   District Director

   Atlanta Office

   South Central Region

   Enforcement Bureau

   47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b).

   47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803(a)(1), 15.201(b).

   See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(e)(4) (defining marketing as including "sale or
   lease, or offering for sale or lease, including advertising for sale or
   lease, or importation, shipment, or distribution for the purpose of
   selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease").

   See 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3 (defining "intentional radiator" as a "device that
   intentionally generates and emits radio frequency energy by radiation or
   induction").

   See Letter from Douglas Miller, District Director, Atlanta Office, to Nick
   Woodhead, President, US Jetting, Inc., dated March 10, 2011.

   Id.

   See Letter from Nick Woodhead, President, US Jetting, Inc., to Douglas
   Miller, District Director, Atlanta Office, dated April 26, 2011 at 1-2
   (LOI Response).

   Id.

   LOI Response at 3.

   47 U.S.C. S: 503(b).

   47 U.S.C. S: 312(f)(1).

   H.R. Rep. No. 97-765, 97th Cong. 2d Sess. 51 (1982) ("This provision
   [inserted in Section 312] defines the terms `willful' and `repeated' for
   purposes of Section 312, and for any other relevant section of the act
   (e.g., Section 503).... As defined ... `willful' means that the licensee
   knew that he was doing the act in question, regardless of whether there
   was an intent to violate the law. `Repeated' means more than once, or
   where the act is continuous, for more than one day. Whether an act is
   considered to be `continuous' would depend upon the circumstances in each
   case. The definitions are intended primarily to clarify the language in
   Sections 312 and 503, and are consistent with the Commission's application
   of those terms ...").

   See, e.g., Application for Review of Southern California Broadcasting Co.,
   Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4388 (1991), recon. denied,
   7 FCC Rcd 3454 (1992).

   See, e.g., Callais Cablevision, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for
   Monetary Forfeiture, 16 FCC Rcd 1359, 1362 P: 10 (2001) (proposing a
   forfeiture for, inter alia, a cable television operator's repeated signal
   leakage).

   Section 312(f)(2) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 312(f)(2), which also applies
   to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under section 503(b) of
   the Act, provides that "[t]he term `repeated', when used with reference to
   the commission or omission of any act, means the commission or omission of
   such act more than once or, if such commission or omission is continuous,
   for more than one day."

   47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b).

   47 C.F.R. S: 15.201(b). Certification "is an equipment authorization
   issued by the Commission, based on representations and test data submitted
   by the applicant." 47 C.F.R. S: 2.907.

   47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(a)(1).

   47 C.F.R. S: 15.201(b).

   The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80
   of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order,
   12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997) (Forfeiture Policy Statement), recon. denied, 15
   FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80.

   47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(2)(E).

   See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80. See also SmartLabs, Inc., Notice of Apparent
   Liability for Forfeiture, 26 FCC Rcd 7780 (Enf.. Bur. 2011) (establishing
   base forfeiture amount of $7,000 for marketing one model of an
   unauthorized device).

   47 C.F.R. S: 1.16.

   47 U.S.C. S:S: 302a(b), 503(b); 47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.204, 0.311, 0.314,
   1.80, 2.803(a)(1), 15.201(b).

   8  See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.1914.

   47 C.F.R. S:S: 1.16, 1.80(f)(3).

   (...continued from previous page)

                                                              (continued....)

   Federal Communications Commission DA 12-63

                                       2

   Federal Communications Commission DA 12-63