Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
)
)
File No.: EB-08-DT-0201
In the Matter of )
NAL/Acct. No.: 201232360004
Richards TV Cable Co. Inc. )
FRN: 0021400247
Jerusalem, Ohio )
PSID No.: 008085
)
)
NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE AND ORDER
Adopted: February 13, 2012 Released: February 13, 2012
By the District Director, Detroit Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement
Bureau:
I. INTRODUCTION
1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (NAL),
we find that Richards TV Cable Co. Inc. (Richards TV), operator of a
cable television system in Jerusalem, Ohio, apparently willfully and
repeatedly violated Section 11.35 of the Commission's rules (Rules)
by failing to install emergency alert system (EAS) equipment. We
conclude that Richards TV is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the
amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000). We further direct Richards
TV to submit, no later than thirty (30) calendar days from the release
date of this NAL, a written statement signed under penalty of perjury
stating that its cable systems are now in compliance with Section
11.35 of the Rules.
II. BACKGROUND
2. On June 19, 2008, agents from the Enforcement Bureau's Detroit Office
(Detroit Office) inspected Richards TV's cable system serving
Jerusalem, Ohio, with the cable system's owner, Mark Richards. The
agents observed that the cable system did not have any EAS equipment
installed. Mr. Richards admitted that the cable system did not have
any EAS equipment and told the agents that he was having trouble
finding affordable equipment. On September 14 and 15, 2009, agents
from the Detroit Office reinspected Richards TV's cable system serving
Jerusalem, Ohio, and found that the cable system still did not have
any EAS equipment installed. On April 25, 2011, Mr. Richards reported
by telephone
to an agent in the Detroit Office that the cable system serving
Jerusalem, Ohio still did not have any
EAS equipment.
III. DISCUSSION
3. Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act),
provides that any person who willfully or repeatedly fails to comply
substantially with the terms and conditions of any license, or
willfully or repeatedly fails to comply with any of the provisions of
the Act or of any rule, regulation or order issued by the Commission
thereunder, shall be liable for a forfeiture penalty. Section
312(f)(1) of the Act defines "willful" as the "conscious and
deliberate commission or omission of [any] act, irrespective of any
intent to violate" the law. The legislative history to Section
312(f)(1) of the Act clarifies that this definition of willful applies
to both Section 312 and 503(b) of the Act and the Commission has so
interpreted the term in the Section 503(b) context. The Commission may
also assess a forfeiture for violations that are merely repeated, and
not willful. The term "repeated" means the commission or omission of
such act more than once or for more than one day.
A. Failure to Install Emergency Alert System Equipment
4. Every analog and digital cable system is part of the nationwide EAS
network and is categorized as a participating national EAS source
unless the cable system affirmatively requests authority to refrain
from participation, and that request is approved by the Commission.
Cable systems must comply with EAS requirements on a headend basis.
The EAS enables the President and state and local governments to
provide immediate communications and information to the general
public. State and local area plans identify local primary sources
responsible for coordinating carriage of common emergency messages
from sources such as the National Weather Service or local emergency
management officials. Required monthly and weekly tests originate
from EAS Local or State Primary
sources and must be retransmitted by the participating cable system. As
the nation's emergency warning system, the EAS is critical to public
safety, and we recognize the vital role that cable systems play in
ensuring its success. The Commission takes seriously any violations of the
Rules implementing the EAS and expects full compliance from its
regulatees.
5. Section 11.35 of the Rules requires all cable systems to ensure that
the EAS encoders, EAS decoders, and attention signal generating and
receiving equipment used as part of the EAS are installed and
operational so that the monitoring and transmitting functions are
available during the times the stations and systems are in operation.
During inspections conducted on June 19, 2008, September 14, 2009, and
September 15, 2009, agents from the Detroit Office observed that
Richards TV's cable system serving Jerusalem, Ohio, did not have any
operational EAS equipment installed. Further, during the inspection,
Mr. Richards, the owner of the cable system, admitted that the system
did not have the required EAS equipment. The owner also reported to an
agent by telephone on April 25, 2011, that as of that date, Richards
TV still had not installed EAS equipment at its cable system serving
Jerusalem, Ohio. Because Richards TV consciously operated its cable
system without EAS equipment for more than one day, we find the
apparent violations to be willful and repeated. Based on the evidence
before us, we find that Richards TV apparently willfully and
repeatedly violated Section 11.35 of the Rules by failing to install
EAS equipment at its cable system in Jerusalem, Ohio.
A. Proposed Forfeiture and Reporting Requirement
6. Pursuant to the Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Section
1.80 of the Rules, the base forfeiture amount for failing to have EAS
equipment installed or operational is $8,000. In assessing the
monetary forfeiture amount, we must also take into account the
statutory factors set forth in Section 503(b) (2) (E) of the Act,
which include the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the
violations, and with respect to the violator, the degree of
culpability, any history of prior offenses, ability to pay, and other
such matters as justice may require. Richards TV's failure to install
EAS equipment at its cable system despite being warned repeatedly to
do so during inspections in June 2008 and again in September 2009,
demonstrates a deliberate disregard for the Commission's requirements.
Based on the evidence before us, we find that an upward adjustment of
$2,000 is warranted. Applying the Forfeiture Policy Statement, Section
1.80 of the Rules, and the statutory factors to the instant case, we
conclude that Richards TV is apparently liable for a total
forfeiture in the amount of $10,000.
7. We direct Richards TV to submit a statement, pursuant to Section 1.16
of the Rules, signed under penalty of perjury by an officer or
director of Richards TV stating that its cable system serving
Jerusalem, Ohio is now in compliance with Section 11.35 of the Rules.
The statement should also state whether Richards TV's cable systems
serving Bealsville, Ohio and New Athens, Ohio are in compliance with
Section 11.35 of the Rules. This statement must be provided to the
Detroit Office at the address listed in paragraph 10 within thirty
(30) calendar days of the release date of this NAL.
IV. ORDERING CLAUSES
8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.111, 0.204(b),
0.311, 0.314 and 1.80 of the Commission's rules, Richards TV Cable Co.
Inc. is hereby NOTIFIED of this APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE in
the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for violation of Section
11.35 of the Rules.
9. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.80 of the
Commission's rules within thirty days of the release date of this
Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, Richards TV
Cable Co. Inc. SHALL PAY the full amount of the proposed forfeiture or
SHALL FILE a written statement seeking reduction or cancellation of
the proposed forfeiture.
10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Richards TV Cable Co., Inc. SHALL SUBMIT a
written statement as described in paragraph 7 within thirty (30)
calendar days of the release date of this Notice of Apparent Liability
for Forfeiture and Order. The statement must be mailed to Federal
Communications Commission, Enforcement Bureau, Northeast Region,
Detroit Office, 24897 Hathaway Street, Farmington Hills, Michigan
48335. Richards TV Cable Co. Inc. shall also email the written
statement to NER-Response@fcc.gov.
11. Payment of the forfeiture must be made by credit card, check or
similar instrument, payable to the order of the Federal Communications
Commission. The payment must include the Account Number and FRN
referenced above. Payment by check or money order may be mailed to
Federal Communications Commission, P.O. Box 979088, St. Louis, MO
63197-9000. Payment by overnight mail may be sent to U.S. Bank -
Government Lockbox #979088, SL-MO-C2-GL, 1005 Convention Plaza, St.
Louis, MO 63101. Payment by wire transfer may be made to ABA Number
021030004, receiving bank TREAS/NYC, and account number 27000001. For
payment by credit card, an FCC Form 159 (Remittance Advice) must be
submitted. When completing the FCC Form 159, enter the NAL/Account
number in block number 23A (call sign/other ID), and enter the letters
"FORF" in block number 24A (payment type code). Requests for full
payment under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief Financial
Officer - Financial Operations, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 1-A625,
Washington, D.C. 20554. If you have questions regarding payment
procedures, please contact the Financial Operations Group Help Desk at
1-877-480-3201 or Email: ARINQUIRIES@fcc.gov. Richards TV Cable Co.
Inc. shall also send electronic notification on the date said payment
is made to NER-Response@fcc.gov.
12. The written statement seeking reduction or cancellation of the
proposed forfeiture, if any, must include a detailed factual statement
supported by appropriate documentation and affidavits pursuant to
Sections 1.16 and 1.80(f)(3) of the Rules. Mail the written statement
to Federal Communications Commission, Enforcement Bureau, Northeast
Region, Detroit Office, 24897 Hathaway Street, Farmington Hills,
Michigan 48335 and include the NAL/Acct. No. referenced in the
caption. Richards TV Cable Co. Inc. also shall email the written
response to NER-Response@fcc.gov.
13. The Commission will not consider reducing or canceling a forfeiture in
response to a claim of inability to pay unless the petitioner submits:
(1) federal tax returns for the most recent three-year period; (2)
financial statements prepared according to generally accepted
accounting practices (GAAP); or (3) some other reliable and objective
documentation that accurately reflects the petitioner's current
financial status. Any claim of inability to pay must specifically
identify the basis for the claim by reference to the financial
documentation submitted.
14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability
for Forfeiture and Order shall be sent by both Certified Mail, Return
Receipt Requested, and regular mail, to Richards TV Cable Co. Inc. at
P.O. Box 2, Jerusalem, Ohio 43747.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
James A. Bridgewater
District Director
Detroit Office
Northeast Region
Enforcement Bureau
47 C.F.R. S: 11.35.
47 U.S.C. S: 503(b).
47 U.S.C. S: 312(f)(1).
H.R. Rep. No. 97-765, 97th Cong. 2d Sess. 51 (1982) ("This provision
[inserted in Section 312] defines the terms `willful' and `repeated' for
purposes of Section 312, and for any other relevant section of the act
(e.g., Section 503) . . . . As defined[,] . . . `willful' means that the
licensee knew that he was doing the act in question, regardless of whether
there was an intent to violate the law. `Repeated' means more than once,
or where the act is continuous, for more than one day. Whether an act is
considered to be `continuous' would depend upon the circumstances in each
case. The definitions are intended primarily to clarify the language in
Sections 312 and 503, and are consistent with the Commission's application
of those terms . . . .").
See, e.g., Application for Review of Southern California Broadcasting Co.,
Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4388 (1991), recons. denied,
7 FCC Rcd 3454.
See, e.g., Callais Cablevision, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for
Monetary Forfeiture, 16 FCC Rcd 1359, 1362 para. 10 (2001) (Callais
Cablevision, Inc.) (proposing a forfeiture for, inter alia, a cable
television operator's repeated signal leakage).
Section 312(f)(2) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 312(f)(2), which also applies
to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of
the Act, provides that "[t]he term `repeated', when used with reference to
the commission or omission of any act, means the commission or omission of
such act more than once or, if such commission or omission is continuous,
for more than one day." See Callais Cablevision, Inc., 16 FCC Rcd at 1362.
47 C.F.R. S:S: 11.11, 11.19, 11.41.
47 C.F.R. S: 11.11.
47 C.F.R. S:S: 11.1, 11.21.
47 C.F.R. S: 11.18. State EAS plans contain guidelines that must be
followed by broadcast and cable personnel, emergency officials and
National Weather Service personnel to activate the EAS for state and local
emergency alerts. The state plans include the EAS header codes and
messages to be transmitted by the primary state, local and relay EAS
sources. 47 C.F.R. S: 11.21.
47 C.F.R. S: 11.61.
47 C.F.R. S: 11.35. Section 11.11 of the Rules states that "[a]nalog cable
systems serving <5,000 subscribers are permitted to operate without an EAS
encoder if they install an FCC-certified decoder." Richards TV reported to
the agent that it has fewer than 5,000 subscribers, so Richards TV is only
required to install a decoder. Richards TV also reported in the last Form
325 that it filed with the Commission that it had fewer than 5,000
subscribers.
The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80
of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order,
12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997) (Forfeiture Policy Statement), recons. denied, 15
FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80.
47 U.S.C. S: 503(b) (2) (E).
47 C.F.R. S: 1.16.
47 U.S.C. S: 503(b); 47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.204, 0.311, 0.314, 1.80,
11.35.
See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.1914.
47 C.F.R. S:S: 1.16, 1.80(f)(3).
(...continued from previous page)
(continued....)
Federal Communications Commission DA 12-194
2
Federal Communications Commission DA 12-194