******************************************************** 
                      NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.

*****************************************************************



                                   Before the

                       Federal Communications Commission

                             Washington, D.C. 20554

   )

   In the Matter of )

   )

   Way Copy Solutions, Inc., and Keith )

   Bertram, )

   )

   Complainant, ) File No.: EB-11-MD-009

   )

   v. )

   )

   Comcast Cable Communications, L.L.C., )

   )

   Respondent. )

   )

                               ORDER OF DISMISSAL

   Adopted: August 20, 2012 Released: August 21, 2012

   By the Deputy Division Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division,
   Enforcement Bureau:

    1. On September 29, 2011, Way Copy Solutions, Inc. and Keith Bertram (Way
       Copy) filed with this Commission a formal complaint against Comcast
       Cable Communications, L.L.C. (Comcast) pursuant to section 208 of the
       Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), 47 U.S.C. S: 208.

    2. On August 9, 2012, Way Copy and Comcast filed a Joint Motion to
       Dismiss the Formal Complaint, stating that they "have resolved their
       dispute." Way Copy and Comcast therefore request that the Formal
       Complaint be dismissed with prejudice.

    3. We are satisfied that granting the Motion to Dismiss will serve the
       public interest by encouraging parties to work privately to narrow and
       resolve disputed issues, which may limit or eliminate the need for
       litigation and the further expenditure of resources by the parties and
       this Commission.

    4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208
       of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S:S: 154(i), 154(j), 208, and sections
       1.720-1.736 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 1.720-1.736, and
       the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the
       Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.311, that the Motion to
       Dismiss IS GRANTED.

    5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the
       Act, 47 U.S.C. S:S: 154(i), 154(j), 208, and sections 1.720-1.736 of
       the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 1.720-1.736, and the authority
       delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47
       C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.311, that Way Copy's Formal Complaint IS
       DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

   FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

   Rosemary McEnery

   Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division

   Enforcement Bureau

   Way Copy Solutions, Inc. v. Comcast Cable Communications, L.L.C., Formal
   Complaint, File No. EB-11-MD-009 (filed Sept. 29, 2011)  (Formal
   Complaint).

   Joint Motion to Dismiss, File No. EB-MD-11-009 (filed Aug. 9, 2012)
   (Motion to Dismiss) at 1.

   Id.

   Federal Communications Commission DA 12-1363