Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version


This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.


                                   Before the

                       Federal Communications Commission

                             Washington, D.C. 20554

     In the Matter of                    )   File No. See Appendix       
     Annual CPNI Certification           )   NAL/Acct. No. See Appendix  
     Apparent Liability for Forfeiture   )   FRN: See Appendix           


   Adopted: April 27, 2011 Released: April 27, 2011

   By the Chief, Telecommunications Consumers Division, Enforcement Bureau:

   1. In this Order, which follows upon our Notice of Apparent Liability for
   Forfeiture ("Omnibus NAL"), we determine that no forfeiture penalties
   should be imposed on the companies listed in the Appendix.

   2. In the Omnibus NAL, we found several companies apparently liable for
   forfeitures in the amount of $25,000 each for repeatedly violating section
   222 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the "Communications
   Act" or "Act"), section 64.2009(e) of the Commission's rules, and the
   Commission's EPIC CPNI Order, because it appeared that they had not filed
   a timely CPNI compliance certification for calendar years 2007 and 2008.
   Consistent with section 503(b)(4) of the Act, each of these companies was
   granted an opportunity to show, in writing, why no such forfeiture should
   be imposed.

   3. Upon review of the record, and based upon additional information
   provided by the

   companies, we find that no forfeiture should be imposed.

    4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 503(b) of the

   Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 0.111, 0.311, and
   1.80(f)(4) of the Commission's rules, the proposed forfeiture issued to
   the companies in the attached Appendix WILL NOT BE IMPOSED.

    5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be sent by First
       Class Mail

   and Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to each of the companies in
   the attached Appendix


   Richard A. Hindman


   Telecommunications Consumers Division

   Enforcement Bureau


     Company name and address     EB File No.     NAL No.      FRN           

     Advanza Telecom, Inc.                                                   
     Attorney of record: Law                                                 
     Office of Kristopher E.      EB-08-TC-2890   0017029141   200932170194  
     Twomey, P.C. 1725 "I"                                                   
     Street, N.W., Suite 300                                                 
     Washington, D.C. 20006                                                  

     G-Link Communications,                                                  
     Attorney of record:          EB-09-TC-102    0016937807   200932170061  
     Russell Eddins, CEO 4396                                                
     Baldwin Avenue, Suite 30                                                
     Little River, SC                                                        

   Annual CPNI Certification, Omnibus Notice of Apparent Liability for
   Forfeiture, 25 FCC Rcd 1790 (Enf. Bur. 2010).

   47 U.S.C. S: 222.

   47 C.F.R. S: 64.2009(e).

   Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Telecommunications
   Carriers' Use of Customer

   Proprietary Network Information and Other Customer Information; IP-Enabled
   Services, CC Docket No. 96-115;

   WC Docket No. 04-36, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed
   Rulemaking, 22 FCC Rcd 6927, 6953

   (2007) ("EPIC CPNI Order"); aff'd sub nom. Nat'l Cable & Telecom. Assoc.
   v. FCC, 555 F.3d (D.C. Cir. 2009).

   (Continued from previous page)


   Federal Communications Commission DA 11-742


   Federal Communications Commission DA 11-742