Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version

******************************************************** 
                      NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.

*****************************************************************



                                   Before the

                       Federal Communications Commission

                             Washington, D.C. 20554


                         )                               
                                                         
     In the Matter of    )   File No: EB-10-MA-0116      
                                                         
     Marckenson Bazile   )   NAL/Acct. No: 201132600003  
                                                         
     Miami, Florida      )   FRN: 0016893083             
                                                         
                         )                               


                  NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE

   Adopted: March 29, 2011 Released: March 29, 2011

   By the Resident Agent, Miami Office, South Central Region, Enforcement
   Bureau:

   I. INTRODUCTION

    1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find
       that Marckenson Bazile ("Mr. Bazile"), apparently willfully and
       repeatedly violated section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as
       amended ("Act"), by operating an unlicensed radio transmitter on the
       frequency 103.9 MHz from his residence in Miami, Florida. We conclude
       that Mr. Bazile is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of
       twenty  thousand dollars ($20,000).

   II. BACKGROUND

    2. On June 16 and June 29, 2010, in response to a complaint, agents from
       the Enforcement Bureau's Miami Office ("Miami Office") used
       direction-finding techniques to locate the source of radio frequency
       transmissions on the frequency 103.9 MHz to a residence in Miami,
       Florida leased by Mr. Bazile. The agents determined that the signals
       from Mr. Bazile's leased property exceeded the limits for operation
       under Part 15 of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), and therefore
       required a license. A review of the Commission's records revealed that
       no license or authorization was issued to Mr. Bazile or anyone else to
       operate a radio station on 103.9 MHz at this location. The agents also
       found information on the Internet listing an email address with
       "marcbazile@..." as the contact information for a Disc Jockey on
       "103.9 PARADIS FM." 

   III. DISCUSSION

    3. Section 503(b) of the Act provides that any person who willfully or
       repeatedly fails to comply substantially with the terms and conditions
       of any license, or willfully or repeatedly fails to comply with any of
       the provisions of the Act or of any rule, regulation or order issued
       by the Commission thereunder, shall be liable for a forfeiture
       penalty. The term "willful" as used in section 503(b) of the Act has
       been interpreted to mean simply that the acts or omissions are
       committed knowingly. The term "repeated" means the commission or
       omission of such act more than once or for more than one day.

    4. Section 301 of the Act states that no person shall use or operate any
       apparatus for the transmission of energy or communications or signals
       by radio within the United States except under and in accordance with
       the Act and with a license granted under the provisions of the Act. On
       June 16 and again on June 29, 2010, Mr. Bazile operated an unlicensed
       radio station on the frequency 103.9 MHz from his leased residence in
       Miami, Florida. Information on the Internet also shows that Mr. Bazile
       served as a DJ for a radio station on the frequency 103.9 MHz. Because
       Mr. Bazile knowingly operated the station, we find the apparent
       violation was willful. Because the operation occurred on more than one
       day, we find the apparent violation was repeated. Based on the
       evidence before us, we find that on June 16 and June 29, 2010, Mr.
       Bazile apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 301 of the
       Act by operating radio transmission equipment without the required
       Commission authorization.

    5. Pursuant to the Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and section
       1.80 of the Rules, the base forfeiture amount for operation without an
       instrument of authorization is $10,000. In assessing the monetary
       forfeiture amount, we must also take into account the statutory
       factors set forth in section 503(b)(2)(E) of the Act, which include
       the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violations, and
       with respect to the violator, the degree of culpability, any history
       of prior offenses, ability to pay, and other such matters as justice
       may require.

    6. Consequently, the $10,000 base forfeiture amount is subject to
       adjustment. In this regard, we take into account Mr. Bazile's previous
       violations. On November 16, 2007, Mr. Bazile admitted to operating an
       unlicensed radio station at Port St. Lucie, Florida on August 16 and
       17, 2007. The fact that Mr. Bazile continued to operate albeit at a
       different location after being put on notice that his unlicensed
       operation contravened the Act, Rules, and related Commission Orders
       demonstrates a deliberate disregard for the Commission's requirements.
       Based on the evidence before us, we find that an upward adjustment of
       $10,000 is warranted. Applying the Forfeiture Policy Statement,
       section 1.80 of the Rules, and the statutory factors to the instant
       case, we conclude that Mr. Bazile is apparently liable for a
       forfeiture in the amount of $20,000.

   IV. ORDERING CLAUSES

    7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 503(b) of the
       Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 0.111, 0.311,
       0.314, and 1.80 of the Rules, Marckenson Bazile is hereby NOTIFIED of
       this APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE in the amount of twenty
       thousand dollars ($20,000) for violation of section 301 of the Act.

    8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.80 of the Rules,
       within thirty (30) days of the release date of this Notice of Apparent
       Liability for Forfeiture, Marckenson Bazile SHALL PAY the full amount
       of the proposed forfeiture or SHALL FILE a written statement seeking
       reduction or cancellation of the proposed forfeiture.

    9. Payment of the forfeiture must be made by credit card, check, or
       similar instrument, payable to the order of the Federal Communications
       Commission. The payment must include the Account Number and FRN
       referenced above. Payment by check or money order may be mailed to
       Federal Communications Commission, P.O. Box 979088, St. Louis, MO
       63197-9000. Payment by overnight mail may be sent to U.S. Bank -
       Government Lockbox #979088, SL-MO-C2-GL, 1005 Convention Plaza, St.
       Louis, MO 63101. Payment by wire transfer may be made to ABA Number
       021030004, receiving bank TREAS/NYC, and account number 27000001. For
       payment by credit card, an FCC Form 159 (Remittance Advice) must be
       submitted.  When completing the FCC Form 159, enter the NAL/Account
       number in block number 23A (call sign/other ID), and enter the letters
       "FORF" in block number 24A (payment type code). Requests for full
       payment under an installment plan should be sent to:  Chief Financial
       Officer -- Financial Operations, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 1-A625,
       Washington, D.C.  20554.   For questions about payment, contact the
       Financial Operations Group Help Desk at 1-877-480-3201 or Email:
       ARINQUIRIES@fcc.gov. Also, Marckenson Bazile shall send an email
       notification on the date said payment is made to 
       SCR-Response@fcc.gov.

   10. The written statement seeking reduction or cancellation of the
       proposed forfeiture, if any, must include a detailed factual statement
       supported by appropriate documentation and affidavits pursuant to
       Sections 1.80(f)(3) and 1.16 of the Rules. The written statement, if
       any, must be mailed to Federal Communications Commission, Enforcement
       Bureau, South Central Region, Miami Office, PO Box 520617, Miami, FL
       33152 and must include the NAL/Acct. No. referenced in the caption.
       The statement shall also be emailed to SCR-Response@fcc.gov.

   11. The Commission will not consider reducing or canceling a forfeiture in
       response to a claim of inability to pay unless the petitioner submits:
       (1) federal tax returns for the most recent three-year period; (2)
       financial statements prepared according to generally accepted
       accounting practices ("GAAP"); or (3) some other reliable and
       objective documentation that accurately reflects the petitioner's
       current financial status. Any claim of inability to pay must
       specifically identify the basis for the claim by reference to the
       financial documentation submitted.

   12. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability
       for Forfeiture shall be sent by both Certified Mail, Return Receipt
       Requested, and regular mail, to Marckenson Bazile at his address of
       record.

   FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

   Stephanie Dabkowski

   Resident Agent

   Miami Office

   South Central Region

   Enforcement Bureau

   47 U.S.C. S: 301.

   Part 15 of the Rules sets out the conditions and technical requirements
   under which certain radio transmission devices may be used without a
   license. In relevant part, section 15.239 of the Rules provides that
   non-licensed broadcasting in the 88-108 MHz band is permitted only if the
   field strength of the transmission does not exceed 250 mV/m at three
   meters. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.239.

   On May 25, 2010, agents from the Miami Office met Mr. Bazile while
   investigating an unlicensed radio station operating on 103.9 MHz from
   another location in Miami. Mr. Bazile asserted the station was located in
   a locked garage space that he was subleasing to another person. On June
   28, 2010, "T-Pouchon" was listed as a contact for ParadisFM, 103.9. The
   photograph of the person listed to the side of "T-Pouchon" was the same
   individual the agents met on May 25, 2010, Mr. Bazile. See
   www.paradisfm.com, Team Paradis tab. On June 28, 2010, an agent from the
   Miami Office searched the Internet and found a message posted by
   Ti_Pouchon at www.sakapfet.com on May 24, 2010 at 05:14 PM which stated:
   "EVERY SUNDAY AT DECO LOUNGE 10PM TO 4PM, 103.9 PARADIS FM OR GO ONLINE
   WWW.PARADIS FM .COM REQUEST LINE (786) 955-8892. IF YOU NEED A DJ CALL JOE
   MIX AT (305) 263-0765." The agent clicked on the user profile for
   TI_POUCHON on www.sakapfet.com, which showed the email address
   marcbazile@yahoo.com.

   47 U.S.C. S: 503(b).

   Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 312(f)(1), which applies to
   violations for which forfeitures are assessed under section 503(b) of the
   Act, provides that "[t]he term `willful', when used with reference to the
   commission or omission of any act, means the conscious and deliberate
   commission or omission of such act, irrespective of any intent to violate
   any provision of this Act or any rule or regulation of the Commission
   authorized by this Act...." See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting
   Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387 (1991), recon. denied, 7
   FCC Rcd 3454 (1992).

   Section 312(f)(2) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 312(f)(2), which also applies
   to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under section 503(b) of
   the Act, provides that "[t]he term `repeated', when used with reference to
   the commission or omission of any act, means the commission or omission of
   such act more than once or, if such commission or omission is continuous,
   for more than one day."

   47 U.S.C. S: 301.

   The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80
   of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order,
   12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997) ("Forfeiture Policy Statement"), recon. denied, 15
   FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80.

   47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(2)(E).

   Letter from Marckenson Bazile to the Tampa Field Office, dated November
   16, 2007. See also Marckenson Bazile, Forfeiture Order, 22 FCC Rcd 21448
   (Enf. Bur. 2007).

   See Nounoune Lubin, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 25 FCC
   Rcd 12654 (Enf. Bur. 2010) (upwardly adjusted by $10,000 because violator
   operated an unlicensed radio station on multiple days with full knowledge
   that such action violated the rules).

   47 U.S.C. S:S: 301, 503(b); 47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.311, 0.314, 1.80.

   See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.1914.

   (...continued from previous page)

                                                              (continued....)

   Federal Communications Commission DA 11 -567

                                       2

   Federal Communications Commission DA 11 -567