Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
)
In the Matter of ) File Number: EB-10-SF-0187
Ira Jones ) NAL/Acct. No.: 201132960001
Merced, California ) FRN: 0020643425
)
NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE
Adopted: March 8, 2011 Released: March 10, 2011
By the District Director, San Francisco Office, Western Region,
Enforcement Bureau:
I. INTRODUCTION
1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find
that Ira Jones ("Jones"), owner and operator of a Citizens Band ("CB")
radio station in Merced, California, apparently willfully and
repeatedly violated section 303(n) of the Communications Act of 1934,
as amended ("Act"), and section 95.426(a) of the Commission's rules
("Rules") by failing to permit inspection of the CB radio station. We
conclude, pursuant to section 503(b) of the Act, that Jones is
apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand
dollars ($7,000).
II. BACKGROUND
2. On March 19, 2010, agents from the Enforcement Bureau's San Francisco
Office ("San Francisco Office") responded to a complaint regarding
radio frequency interference within the radio communication system
equipment of the Merced County Fire Department. The agents observed
that transmissions on CB radio station frequency 27.165 MHz appeared
to match the audio distortion received on frequency 154.4 MHz within
the Merced County Fire Department's audio receiver and speaker system
in what appeared to be audio rectification interference within the
department's receiver and speaker system. The agents then monitored
the radio transmissions on frequency 27.165 MHz and used radio
direction finding techniques to locate the source of the signal
associated with the interference to a CB radio station operating from
Jones's residence in Merced, California.
3. On March 26, 2010, agents from the San Francisco Office again
monitored frequency 27.165 MHz and used radio direction finding
techniques to locate the source of the signal creating the audio
rectification interference to a CB radio station operating from
Jones's residence in Merced, California. Later the same day, the
agents approached Jones's residence, knocked on his door, identified
themselves as agents of the FCC and presented their official badges
and credentials. The individual identified himself as Jones. The
agents told Jones about the radio frequency interference complaint
from the nearby Merced County Fire Department and asked him if he was
the owner or operator of the CB radio station. Jones acknowledged that
he was the operator of the CB radio station but denied causing any
interference to the Merced County Fire Department. The agents then
requested that they be allowed to inspect the CB radio station to
determine the cause of the interference. Jones denied the agents'
request to inspect the CB radio station. The agents warned Jones that
refusing to allow an inspection of a CB radio station is a violation
of section 95.426(a) of the Rules and section 303(n) of the Act,
explaining that these rules require CB operators to make their
stations available to authorized FCC representatives for inspection.
Jones again denied the request and asserted that the FCC must have a
search warrant to inspect his CB station. The agents advised Jones
that he was required to take necessary precautions to avoid causing
radio interference by operating at power levels that do not exceed
legal limits and by refraining from using a radio frequency power
amplifier.
4. Prior to leaving the premises, the agents issued an on-scene "Notice
of Unlicensed Operation" ("First Notice") to Jones. The First Notice
expressly warned that Jones's refusal to allow inspection of his radio
equipment violated section 303(n) of the Act and included the full
text of section 303(n). Jones refused to accept a copy of the First
Notice and the agents left the document on a chair near the front door
of the house. The agents then left the premises, but continued to
monitor 27.165 MHz and heard Jones describe the agents' attempted
inspection. Later on March 26, 2010, the agents again monitored
frequency 27.165 MHz and noted that Jones was operating his CB radio
station without causing interference to the Merced County Fire
Department radio communication equipment. Subsequently, the Merced
County Fire Department reported that the interference ceased.
5. On August 25, 2010, the San Francisco Office received another
complaint from the Merced County Fire Department that the interference
to its radio communication equipment had resumed over the prior two
weeks and appeared to again be caused by a CB radio station operated
by Jones. According to the complainant, the interference lasted from
10 minutes to 45 minutes at a time and Jones's CB radio station could
be clearly heard on the radio communication equipment at the Merced
County fire station during these times.
6. On August 27, 2010, agents from the San Francisco Office again
monitored frequency 27.165 MHz and used radio direction finding
techniques to locate the source of the interfering signal to a CB
radio station operating from Jones's residence in Merced, California.
Later the same day, the agents, along with two Merced City police
officers, approached Jones at his front yard, identified themselves as
agents of the FCC and presented their official badges and credentials.
The two Merced City police officers identified the man as Jones. The
agents told Jones about the radio frequency interference complaint and
requested that they be allowed to inspect the CB radio station to
determine the cause of the interference. Jones denied the request.
Jones again admitted that he was the owner and operator of the CB
radio station, but stated that he was not the owner of the house and
that he had to refuse the inspection. Jones understood that refusal to
allow an inspection could result in a $7,000 forfeiture assessment.
After further conversation with the agents and the police officers,
Jones subsequently admitted to being the owner of the house. The
agents again requested that they be allowed to inspect the CB radio
station and reiterated that Jones's refusal to allow an inspection of
a CB radio station is a violation of section 95.426(a) of the Rules
and section 303(n) of the Act and is subject to a forfeiture. Jones
again denied the request to inspect his CB station. The agents then
gave Jones an oral warning and issued a second on-scene "Notice of
Unlicensed Operation" ("Second Notice") to Jones. The Second Notice
expressly warned that Jones's refusal to allow inspection of his radio
equipment violated section 303(n) of the Act and included the full
text of section 303(n). Jones refused to accept a copy of the Second
Notice and the agents left the document on a wooden yard border. The
agents then left the premises.
7. On September 1, 2010, the San Francisco Office received another
complaint from the Merced County Fire Department stating that Jones
had resumed CB radio station operation at approximately 5:30 p.m., and
interference within the Merced County Fire Department radio
communication system equipment had also resumed.
III. DISCUSSION
8. Section 503(b) of the Act provides that any person who willfully or
repeatedly fails to comply substantially with the terms and conditions
of any license, or willfully or repeatedly fails to comply with any of
the provisions of the Act or of any rule, regulation or order issued
by the Commission thereunder, shall be liable for a forfeiture
penalty. The term "willful" as used in section 503(b) has been
interpreted to mean simply that the acts or omissions are committed
knowingly. The term "repeated" means the commission or omission of
such act more than once or for more than one day.
9. Section 303(n) of the Act states that the Commission has the
"authority to inspect all radio installations associated with stations
required to be licensed by any Act, or which the Commission by rule
has authorized to operate without a license under section 307(e)(1)."
Section 307(e)(1) expressly includes "the citizen band radio service."
Additionally, section 95.426(a) of the Rules (CB Rule 26) states "[i]f
an authorized FCC representative requests to inspect your CB station,
you must make your CB station and records available for inspection."
The Commission has no requirement that an agent obtain a warrant prior
to conducting such an inspection.
10. On March 26, 2010 and August 27, 2010, agents from the San Francisco
Office located the source of the signal on 27.165 MHz to Jones's
residence in Merced, California. On each of these dates, in an effort
to determine the cause of the reported interference created within the
Merced County Fire Department radio communication equipment and to
resolve it, the agents requested an inspection of Jones's CB radio
station. Jones denied both requests, despite the fact that at both
inspections, the San Francisco agents explained section 95.426(a) of
the Rules (CB Rule 26) and section 303(n) of the Act to Jones, and
provided Jones repeated verbal and written on-scene warnings by the
agents of the consequences of refusing to allow an inspection of a
radio station. Based on the record evidence, we find that Ira Jones
apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 303(n) of the Act
and section 95.426(a) of the Rules by failing to permit inspection of
his CB radio station.
IV. CONCLUSION
11. Pursuant to the Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and section
1.80 of the Rules, the base forfeiture amount for failing to permit
inspection is $7,000. In assessing the monetary forfeiture amount, we
must also take into account the statutory factors set forth in section
503(b)(2)(E) of the Act, which include the nature, circumstances,
extent, and gravity of the violations, and with respect to the
violator, the degree of culpability, any history of prior offenses,
ability to pay, and other such matters as justice may require.
Considering the entire record and applying the Forfeiture Policy
Statement, section 1.80, and the statutory factors to the instant
case, we conclude that Ira Jones is apparently liable for a $7,000
forfeiture.
12. We also warn Jones that operation of his CB radio station with more
power than authorized (AM (A3) - 4 watts (carrier power) SSB - 12
watts (peak envelope power)) is a violation of section 95.410 of the
Rules. Use of a transmitter which has carrier or peak envelope power
in excess of that authorized will void Jones's authority to operate
the station. We further warn Jones, pursuant to section 95.423 of the
Rules, that overpowered operation of his CB radio station appears to
be creating the interference within the Merced Fire County Department
radio communications system. Mr. Jones must operate his CB station in
compliance with the FCC's Rules and at the power limit indicated
above. Failure to abide by these rules may result in additional
sanctions and monetary forfeitures.
V. ORDERING CLAUSES
13. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 503(b) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 0.111, 0.311,
0.314 and 1.80 of the Rules, Ira Jones is hereby NOTIFIED of this
APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE in the amount of seven thousand
dollars ($7,000) for violations of section 303(n) of the Act and
section 95.426(a) of the Rules.
14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.80 of the Rules,
within thirty days of the release date of this Notice of Apparent
Liability for Forfeiture, Ira Jones SHALL PAY the full amount of the
proposed forfeiture or SHALL FILE a written statement seeking
reduction or cancellation of the proposed forfeiture.
15. Payment of the forfeiture must be made by check or similar instrument,
payable to the order of the Federal Communications Commission. The
payment must include the NAL/Account Number and FRN referenced above.
Payment by check or money order may be mailed to Federal
Communications Commission, P.O. Box 979088, St. Louis, MO 63197-9000.
Payment by overnight mail may be sent to U.S. Bank - Government
Lockbox #979088, SL-MO-C2-GL, 1005 Convention Plaza, St. Louis, MO
63101. Payment by wire transfer may be made to ABA Number 021030004,
receiving bank TREAS/NYC, and account number 27000001. For payment by
credit card, an FCC Form 159 (Remittance Advice) must be submitted.
When completing the FCC Form 159, enter the NAL/Account number in
block number 23A (call sign/other ID), and enter the letters "FORF" in
block number 24A (payment type code). Requests for full payment under
an installment plan should be sent to: Chief Financial Officer --
Financial Operations, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 1-A625, Washington,
D.C. 20554. Please contact the Financial Operations Group Help
Desk at 1-877-480-3201 or Email: ARINQUIRIES@fcc.gov with any
questions regarding payment procedures. Ira Jones shall also send
electronic notification on the date said payment is made to
WR-Response@fcc.gov.
16. The written statement seeking reduction or cancellation of the
proposed forfeiture, if any, must include a detailed factual statement
supported by appropriate documentation and affidavits pursuant to
Sections 1.80(f)(3) and 1.16 of the Rules. The written statement must
be mailed to Federal Communications Commission, Enforcement Bureau,
Western Region, San Francisco Office, 5653 Stoneridge Drive,
Pleasanton, California, 94588-8543, and must include the NAL/Acct. No.
referenced in the caption. An electronic copy shall also be emailed to
WR-Response@fcc.gov.
17. The Commission will not consider reducing or canceling a forfeiture in
response to a claim of inability to pay unless the petitioner submits:
(1) federal tax returns for the most recent three-year period; (2)
financial statements prepared according to generally accepted
accounting practices ("GAAP"); or (3) some other reliable and
objective documentation that accurately reflects the petitioner's
current financial status. Any claim of inability to pay must
specifically identify the basis for the claim by reference to the
financial documentation submitted.
18. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability
for Forfeiture shall be sent by Certified Mail, Return Receipt
Requested, and regular mail, to Ira Jones at his address of record.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Thomas N. Van Stavern
District Director
San Francisco District Office
Western Region
Enforcement Bureau
47 U.S.C. S: 303(n).
47 C.F.R. S: 95.426(a), (CB Rule 26).
47 U.S.C. S: 503(b).
Audio rectification interference occurs when an electronic circuit
(usually an amplifier), which ideally should respond only to audio
frequency signals, responds to external radio frequency (RF) signals.
Typically, the circuit picks up signals from a nearby radio transmitter in
addition to the sound the listener wants to hear. The unwanted signal may
be constant or intermittent, faint or uncontrollably loud.
47 C.F.R. S: 95.426(a), (CB Rule 26).
47 U.S.C. S: 303(n).
Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 312(f)(1), which applies to
violations for which forfeitures are assessed under section 503(b) of the
Act, provides that "[t]he term `willful', when used with reference to the
commission or omission of any act, means the conscious and deliberate
commission or omission of such act, irrespective of any intent to violate
any provision of this Act or any rule or regulation of the Commission
authorized by this Act...." See Southern California Broadcasting Co., 6
FCC Rcd 4387 (1991), recon. denied, 7 FCC Rcd 3454 (1992).
Section 312(f)(2) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 312(f)(2), which also applies
to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of
the Act, provides that "[t]he term `repeated', when used with reference to
the commission or omission of any act, means the commission or omission of
such act more than once or, if such commission or omission is continuous,
for more than one day."
47 U.S.C. S: 303(n) (The Commission shall "[h]ave authority to inspect all
radio installations associated with stations required to be licensed by
any Act, or which the Commission by rule has authorized to operate without
a license under section 307 (e)(1) of this title, or which are subject to
the provisions of any Act, treaty, or convention binding on the United
States, to ascertain whether in construction, installation, and operation
they conform to the requirements of the rules and regulations of the
Commission, the provisions of any Act, the terms of any treaty or
convention binding on the United States, and the conditions of the license
or other instrument of authorization under which they are constructed,
installed, or operated.").
47 U.S.C. S: 307(e)(1) ("[T]he Commission may by rule authorize the
operation of radio stations without individual licenses in the . . .
citizens band radio service. . . . ").
47 C.F.R. S: 95.426(a).
See Norfolk Southern Railway Company, 11 FCC Rcd 519 (CIB 1996) (The right
to inspect a station is one of the cornerstones of the FCC's ability to
ensure compliance with the Communications Act and the FCC regulations).
See also, Randall R. Gaines, 72 FCC 2d 871, P:13 (Rev. Board 1979) (A
search warrant is not required for an inspection of a CB radio station).
The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80
of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order,
12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997) ("Forfeiture Policy Statement"), recon. denied, 15
FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80.
47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(2)(E).
47 C.F.R. S: 95.410, (CB Rule 10).
47 C.F.R. S: 95.410(c), (CB Rule 10).
47 C.F.R. S: 95.423, (CB Rule 23).
47 U.S.C. S:S: 503(b), 303(n); 47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.311, 0.314, 1.80,
95.426(a).
See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.1914.
(...continued from previous page)
(continued....)
Federal Communications Commission DA 11-457
3
Federal Communications Commission DA 11-457