Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version


This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.


                                   Before the

                       Federal Communications Commission

                             Washington, D.C. 20554

     In the Matter of                        File No. EB-08-TC-4257      
     Intercel Telecoms Group, Inc.           NAL/Acct. No. 200932170470  
     Apparent Liability for Forfeiture       FRN: 0014793905             


   Adopted: October 24, 2011 Released: October 25, 2011

   By the Chief, Telecommunications Consumers Division, Enforcement Bureau:

   1. In this Order, which follows upon our Omnibus Notice of Apparent
   Liability for Forfeiture (Omnibus NAL), we determine that no forfeiture
   penalty should be imposed on Intercel Telecoms Group, Inc. (Intercel or

   2. In the Omnibus NAL, we found Intercel apparently liable for a
   forfeiture for repeatedly violating section 222 of the Communications Act
   of 1934, as amended (the Communications Act or Act), section 64.2009(e) of
   the Commission's rules, and the Commission's EPIC CPNI Order, because it
   appeared that the Company had not filed a timely CPNI compliance
   certification for calendar years 2007 and 2008. Consistent with section
   503(b)(4) of the Act, Intercel was granted an opportunity to show, in
   writing, why no such forfeiture should be imposed.

    3. Upon review of the record, and based upon additional information
       provided by Intercel, we

   agree that no forfeiture penalty should be imposed.

   4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 503(b) of the

   Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 0.111, 0.311, and
   1.80(f)(4) of the Commission's rules, the proposed forfeiture issued to

   5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be sent by First

   Class Mail and Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to Intercel
   Telecoms Group, Inc., Attn. Joseph Gatt, CEO, 3914 Centreville Rd., Suite
   200, Chantilly, VA 20151.


   Richard A. Hindman


   Telecommunications Consumers Division

   Enforcement Bureau

   Annual CPNI Certification, Omnibus Notice of Apparent Liability for
   Forfeiture, 25 FCC Rcd 1795 (Enf. Bur. 2010).

   47 U.S.C. S: 222.

   47 C.F.R. S: 64.2009(e).

   Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Telecommunications
   Carriers' Use of Customer

   Proprietary Network Information and Other Customer Information; IP-Enabled
   Services, CC Docket No. 96-115;

   WC Docket No. 04-36, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed
   Rulemaking, 22 FCC Rcd 6927, 6953 (2007) (EPIC CPNI Order); aff'd sub nom.
   Nat'l Cable & Telecom. Assoc. v. FCC, 555 F.3d 996 (D.C. Cir. 2009).

   (...continued from previous page)


   Federal Communications Commission DA 11-1771


   Federal Communications Commission DA 11-1771