Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version

******************************************************** 
                      NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.

*****************************************************************



                                   Before the

                       Federal Communications Commission

                             Washington, D.C. 20554


                                     )                            
                                                                  
                                     )                            
                                                                  
     In the Matter of                )   File No.: EB-09-SE-080   
                                                                  
     Airadigm Communications, Inc.   )   Acct. No.: 201132100035  
                                                                  
     dba AirFire Mobile              )   FRN: 0002701688          
                                                                  
                                     )                            
                                                                  
                                     )                            


                                     ORDER

   Adopted: September 30, 2011 Released: September 30, 2011

   By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau:

    1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into
       between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Airadigm Communications,
       Inc. dba AirFire Mobile ("Airadigm"). The Consent Decree resolves and
       terminates the Bureau's investigation into Airadigm's compliance with
       sections 1.1307(a)(4) and 1.1312(a) of the Commission's Rules
       concerning Airadigm's obligation to assess the potential effect on the
       environment of the construction of a wireless communications facility.

    2. The Bureau and Airadigm have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree
       that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached
       hereto and incorporated by reference.

    3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the
       facts before us, we find that the public interest would be served by
       adopting the Consent Decree and terminating the investigation.

    4. In the absence of material new evidence relating to this matter, we
       conclude that our investigation raises no substantial or material
       questions of fact as to whether Airadigm possesses the basic
       qualifications, including those related to character, to hold or
       obtain any Commission license or authorization.

    5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 503(b)
       of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 0.111 and
       0.311 of the Commission's Rules, the Consent Decree attached to this
       Order IS ADOPTED.

    6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above-captioned investigation IS
       TERMINATED.

    7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order and Consent Decree
       shall be sent by first class certified mail, return receipt requested,
       to Linda J. Springer, Director of Finance and Accounting, Airadigm
       Communications, Inc. dba AirFire Mobile, 2301 Kelbe Dr., 206, Little
       Chute, WI 54140-1201, and counsel for Airadigm, Todd Slamowitz, Esq.,
       counsel for Airadigm Communications, Inc., Lukas, Nace, Gutierrez &
       Sachs, LLP, 1650 Tysons Blvd., Suite 1500, McLean, Virginia 22102.

   FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

   P. Michele Ellison

   Chief, Enforcement Bureau

                                   Before the

                       Federal Communications Commission

                             Washington, D.C. 20554


                                     )                            
                                                                  
     In the Matter of                )   File No.: EB-09-SE-080   
                                                                  
     Airadigm Communications, Inc.   )   Acct. No.: 201132100035  
                                                                  
     dba AirFire Mobile              )   FRN: 0002701688          
                                                                  
                                     )                            


                                 CONSENT DECREE

   The Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission and
   Airadigm Communications, Inc., dba AirFire Mobile, by their authorized
   representatives, hereby enter into this Consent Decree for the purpose of
   terminating the Enforcement Bureau's investigation into possible
   violations of sections 1.1307(a)(4) and 1.1312(a) of the Commission's
   rules, pertaining to the required assessment of the potential effect on
   the environment of the construction of a wireless communications facility.

   I. DEFINITIONS

    1. For the purposes of this Consent Decree, the following definitions
       shall apply:

    a. "Act" means the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.
       S: 151 et seq.

    b. "Adopting Order" means an order of the Bureau adopting the terms of
       this Consent Decree without change, addition, deletion, or
       modification.

    c. "Airadigm" means Airadigm Communications, Inc., dba AirFire Mobile,
       and its predecessors-in-interest and successors-in-interest.

    d. "Bureau" means the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications
       Commission.

    e. "Commission" and "FCC" mean the Federal Communications Commission and
       all of its bureaus and offices.

    f. "Communications Laws" means collectively, the Act, the Rules, and the
       published and promulgated orders and decisions of the Commission to
       which Airadigm is subject by virtue of its business activities,
       including but not limited to, the Environmental Laws.

    g. "Compliance Plan" means the compliance obligations and compliance
       program described in this Consent Decree at paragraph 8.

    h. "Covered Employees" means all employees and agents of Airadigm who
       perform duties, or supervise, oversee, or manage the performance of
       duties, that relate to Airadigm's responsibilities under the
       Environmental Rules.

    i. "Effective Date" means the date on which the Bureau releases the
       Adopting Order.

    j. "Environmental Rules" means sections 1.1307(a)(4) and 1.1312(a) of the
       Rules and other Communications Laws implementing the National
       Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended.

    k. "Investigation" means the investigation commenced by the Bureau upon
       receipt of a referral from the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau
       regarding Airadigm's possible violation of sections 1.1307(a)(4) and
       1.1312(a) of the Rules.

    l. "Operating Procedures" means the standard, internal operating
       procedures and compliance policies established by Airadigm to
       implement the Compliance Plan.

    m. "Parties" means Airadigm and the Bureau, each of which is a "Party".

    n. "Rules" means the Commission's regulations found in Title 47 of the
       Code of Federal Regulations.

   II. BACKGROUND

    2. Section 1.1307(a)(4) of the Rules requires applicants and licensees to
       consider whether their proposed facilities would affect properties
       listed or eligible for listing ("historic properties") in the National
       Register of Historic Places ("National Register"). This obligation
       expressly applies to facilities for which no pre-construction
       authorization is required. In considering the potential effects on
       historic properties, applicants and licensees must, under section
       1.1307(a)(4) of the Rules, follow the prescribed procedures
       established by the Programmatic Agreements for collocated antennas and
       for historic preservation review. The Collocation Agreement and the
       Nationwide Agreement are designed to tailor and streamline in the
       context of communications tower and antenna construction the review
       and consultation procedures required by the National Historic
       Preservation Act of 1966, as amended ("NHPA"), and the implementing
       regulations issued by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
       ("Advisory Council").

    3. Airadigm, a Tier III wireless carrier serving rural areas in
       Wisconsin, constructed a 150-foot monopole tower in Red River,
       Wisconsin ("Red River site") on July 1, 2005, prior to performing the
       required, pre-construction historic preservation review. Several years
       after construction of the tower, Airadigm hired a consultant to
       evaluate the Red River site for compliance with the Nationwide
       Agreement. Based on this evaluation, Airadigm submitted an FCC Form
       620 environmental assessment to the Commission's Wireless
       Telecommunications Bureau ("WTB") and to the relevant Wisconsin State
       Historic Preservation Officer ("SHPO") concluding that the constructed
       Red River site did not have adverse direct or visual effects on
       historic properties located in the area of potential effects. WTB
       reviewed Airadigm's FCC Form 620 and supporting documentation,
       including the evaluation by the Wisconsin SHPO, and concurred that
       this Airadigm tower did not have an adverse effect on historic
       properties. WTB then referred the matter to the Enforcement Bureau for
       investigation.

   III. TERMS OF AGREEMENT

    4. Adopting Order. The Parties agree that the provisions of this Consent
       Decree shall be subject to final approval by the Bureau by
       incorporation of such provisions by reference in the Adopting Order.

    5. Jurisdiction. Airadigm agrees that the Bureau has jurisdiction over it
       and the matters contained in this Consent Decree and that the Bureau
       has the authority to enter into and adopt this Consent Decree.

    6. Effective Date; Violations. The Parties agree that this Consent Decree
       shall become effective on the Effective Date as defined herein. As of
       the Effective Date, the Adopting Order and this Consent Decree shall
       have the same force and effect as any other order of the Bureau. Any
       violation of the Adopting Order or of the terms of this Consent Decree
       shall constitute a separate violation of a Bureau order, entitling the
       Bureau to exercise any rights and remedies attendant to the
       enforcement of a Commission order.

    7. Termination of Investigation. In express reliance on the covenants and
       representations in this Consent Decree and to avoid further
       expenditure of public resources, the Bureau agrees to terminate the
       Investigation. In consideration for the termination of the
       Investigation, Airadigm agrees to the terms, conditions, and
       procedures contained herein. The Bureau further agrees that in the
       absence of new material evidence, the Bureau will not use the facts
       developed in the Investigation through the Effective Date, or the
       existence of this Consent Decree, to institute on its own motion any
       new proceeding, formal or informal, or take any action on its own
       motion against Airadigm concerning the matters that were the subject
       of the Investigation. The Bureau also agrees that it will not, in the
       absence of new material evidence, use the facts developed in the
       Investigation through the Effective Date, or the existence of this
       Consent Decree, to institute on its own motion any proceeding, formal
       or informal, or take any action on its own motion against Airadigm
       with respect to Airadigm's basic qualifications, including its
       character qualifications, to be a Commission licensee.

    8. Compliance Plan. For purposes of settling the matters set forth
       herein,  Airadigm shall within sixty (60) calendar days after the
       Effective Date, develop and implement a Compliance Plan to help ensure
       future compliance with the Communications Laws, including the
       Environmental Rules, and with the terms and conditions of this Consent
       Decree. The Compliance Plan shall include, at a minimum, the following
       components:

    a. Compliance Officer. Within thirty (30) calendar days after the
       Effective Date, Airadigm shall designate a senior corporate manager
       with the requisite corporate and organizational authority to serve as
       Compliance Officer and to discharge the duties set forth below. The
       person designated as the Compliance Officer shall be responsible for
       developing, implementing, and administering the Compliance Plan and
       ensuring that Airadigm complies with the terms and conditions of the
       Compliance Plan and this Consent Decree. In addition to the general
       knowledge of the Communications Laws necessary to discharge his/her
       duties under this Agreement, the Compliance Officer shall have
       specific knowledge of the Environmental Rules prior to assuming
       his/her duties.

    b. Operating Procedures on Environmental Rules. Within sixty (60)
       calendar days after the Effective Date, Airadigm shall establish
       Operating Procedures that all Covered Employees must follow to help
       ensure compliance with the Environmental Rules. Airadigm's Operating
       Procedures shall include internal procedures and policies specifically
       designed to ensure that Airadigm performs the required review of the
       potential effects on the environment of any proposed facilities,
       including facilities for which no pre-construction authorization is
       required, prior to the initiation of construction of such proposed
       facilities. Airadigm's Operating Procedures shall incorporate a
       Compliance Checklist that describes the steps that a Covered Employee
       must follow to determine whether construction of the proposed facility
       is categorically excluded from environmental processing under section
       1.1306 of the Rules or may have a significant environmental effect, as
       defined in section 1.1307 of the Rules.

    c. Compliance Manual. Within sixty (60) calendar days after the Effective
       Date, the Compliance Officer shall develop and distribute a Compliance
       Manual to all Covered Employees. The Compliance Manual shall explain
       the Environmental Rules and set forth the Operating Procedures that
       Covered Employees shall follow to help ensure Airadigm's compliance
       with the Environmental Rules. Airadigm shall periodically review and
       revise the Compliance Manual as necessary to ensure that the
       information set forth therein remains current and complete. Airadigm
       shall distribute any revisions to the Compliance Manual promptly to
       all Covered Employees.

    d. Compliance Training. Airadigm shall establish and implement a
       Compliance Training Program on compliance with the Environmental Rules
       and the Operating Procedures. As part of the Compliance Training
       Program, Covered Employees shall be advised of Airadigm's obligation
       to report any non-compliance with the Environmental Rules under
       paragraph 9 of this Consent Decree and shall be instructed on how to
       disclose non-compliance to the Compliance Officer. All Covered
       Employees shall be trained pursuant to the Compliance Training Program
       within sixty (60) calendar days after the Effective Date,  except that
       any person who becomes a Covered Employee at any time after the
       Effective Date shall be trained within thirty (30) calendar days after
       the date such person becomes a Covered Employee. Airadigm shall repeat
       the compliance training on an annual basis, and shall periodically
       review and revise the Compliance Training Program as necessary to
       ensure that it remains current and complete and to enhance its
       effectiveness.

    e. Termination Date. Unless stated otherwise, the requirements of this
       paragraph 8 of the Consent Decree shall expire twenty-four (24) months
       after the Effective Date.

    9. Reporting Non-Compliance. Airadigm shall report any non-compliance
       with the Environmental Rules and with the terms and conditions of this
       Consent Decree within fifteen (15) calendar days after its discovery
       of such non-compliance. Such reports shall include a detailed
       explanation of (i) each instance of non-compliance; (ii) the steps
       that Airadigm has taken or will take to remedy such non-compliance;
       (iii) the schedule on which such proposed remedial actions will be
       taken; and (iv) the steps that Airadigm has taken or will take to
       prevent the recurrence of any such non-compliance. All reports of
       non-compliance shall be submitted to the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement
       Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445
       12th Street, S.W., Rm. 3C366, Washington, D.C. 20554, with copies
       submitted electronically to Nissa Laughner at Nissa.Laughner@fcc.gov
       and JoAnn Lucanik at JoAnn.Lucanik@fcc.gov. The reporting obligations
       set forth in this paragraph 9 shall expire twenty-four (24) months
       after the Effective Date.

   10. Compliance Reports. Airadigm shall file Compliance Reports with the
       Commission ninety (90) calendar days after the Effective Date, twelve
       (12) months after the Effective Date and twenty-four (24) months after
       the Effective Date.

    a. Each Compliance Report shall include a detailed description of
       Airadigm's efforts during the relevant period to comply with the terms
       and conditions of this Consent Decree and the Environmental Rules. In
       addition, each Compliance Report shall include a certification by the
       Compliance Officer, as an agent of and on behalf of Airadigm, stating
       that the Compliance Officer has personal knowledge that Airadigm (i)
       has established and implemented the Compliance Plan; (ii) has utilized
       the Operating Procedures since the implementation of the Compliance
       Plan; and (iii) is not aware of any instances of non-compliance with
       the terms and conditions of this Consent Decree, including the
       reporting obligations set forth in paragraph 9 hereof.

    b. The Compliance Officer's certification shall be accompanied by a
       statement explaining the basis for such certification and must comply
       with section 1.16 of the Rules and be subscribed to as true under
       penalty of perjury in substantially the form set forth therein.

    c. If the Compliance Officer cannot provide the requisite certification,
       the Compliance Officer, as an agent of and on behalf of Airadigm,
       shall provide the Commission with a detailed explanation of the
       reason(s) why and describe fully (i) each instance of non-compliance;
       (ii) the steps that Airadigm has taken or will take to remedy such
       non-compliance, including the schedule on which proposed remedial
       actions will be taken; and (iii) the steps that Airadigm has taken or
       will take to prevent the recurrence of any such non-compliance,
       including the schedule on which such preventive action will be taken.

    d. All Compliance Reports shall be submitted to the Chief, Spectrum
       Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications
       Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Rm. 3C366, Washington, D.C. 20554.
       All reports shall also be submitted electronically to Nissa Laughner
       at Nissa.Laughner@fcc.gov and to JoAnn Lucanik at
       JoAnn.Lucanik@fcc.gov.

   11. Section 208 Complaints; Subsequent Investigations. Nothing in this
       Consent Decree shall prevent the Commission or its delegated authority
       from adjudicating complaints filed pursuant to section 208 of the Act
       against Airadigm or its affiliates for alleged violations of the Act,
       or for any other type of alleged misconduct, regardless of when such
       misconduct took place. The Commission's adjudication of any such
       complaints will be based solely on the record developed in that
       proceeding. Except as expressly provided in this Consent Decree, this
       Consent Decree shall not prevent the Commission from investigating new
       evidence of noncompliance by Airadigm with the Act, the Rules, or
       Commission orders.

   12. Voluntary Contribution. Airadigm agrees that it will make a voluntary
       contribution to the United States Treasury in the amount of seven
       thousand dollars ($7,000.00). The payment must be made within thirty
       (30) calendar days after the Effective Date. The payment must be made
       by check or similar instrument, payable to the order of the Federal
       Communications Commission. The payment must include the Account Number
       and FRN referenced in the caption to the Adopting Order. Payment by
       check or money order may be mailed to Federal Communications
       Commission, P.O. Box 979088, St. Louis, MO 63197-9000. Payment by
       overnight mail may be sent to U.S. Bank - Government Lockbox #979088,
       SL-MO-C2-GL, 1005 Convention Plaza, St. Louis, MO 63101. Payment by
       wire transfer may be made to ABA Number 021030004, receiving bank
       TREAS/NYC, and Account Number 27000001. For payment by credit card, an
       FCC Form 159 (Remittance Advice) must be submitted. When completing
       the FCC Form 159, enter the Account Number in block number 23A (call
       sign/other ID), and enter the letters "FORF" in block number 24A
       (payment type code). Airadigm shall also send electronic notification
       to Nissa Laughner at Nissa.Laughner@fcc.gov and to JoAnn Lucanik at
       JoAnn.Lucanik@fcc.gov on the date said payment is made.

   13. Waivers. Airadigm waives any and all rights it may have to seek
       administrative or judicial reconsideration, review, appeal, or stay,
       or to otherwise challenge or contest the validity of this Consent
       Decree and the Adopting Order, provided the Bureau issues an Adopting
       Order as defined herein. Airadigm shall retain the right to challenge
       Commission interpretation of the Consent Decree or any terms contained
       herein. If either Party (or the United States on behalf of the
       Commission) brings a judicial action to enforce the terms of the
       Adopting Order, neither Airadigm nor the Commission shall contest the
       validity of the Consent Decree or of the Adopting Order, and Airadigm
       shall waive any statutory right to a trial de novo. Airadigm hereby
       agrees to waive any claims it may have under the Equal Access to
       Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. S: 504 and 47 C.F.R. S: 1.1501 et seq., relating
       to the matters addressed in this Consent Decree.

   14. Invalidity. In the event that this Consent Decree in its entirety is
       rendered invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, it shall
       become null and void and may not be used in any manner in any legal
       proceeding.

   15. Subsequent Rule or Order. The Parties agree that if any provision of
       the Consent Decree conflicts with any subsequent rule or order adopted
       by the Commission (except an order specifically intended to revise the
       terms of this Consent Decree to which Airadigm does not expressly
       consent) that provision will be superseded by such Rule or Commission
       order.

   16. Successors and Assigns. Airadigm agrees that the provisions of this
       Consent Decree shall be binding on its successors, assigns, and
       transferees.

   17. Final Settlement. The Parties agree and acknowledge that this Consent
       Decree shall constitute a final settlement between the Parties. The
       Parties further agree that this Consent Decree does not constitute
       either an adjudication on the merits or a factual or legal finding or
       determination regarding any compliance or noncompliance with the
       requirements of the Act, the Rules, or Commission orders.

   18. Modifications. This Consent Decree cannot be modified without the
       advance written consent of both Parties.

   19. Paragraph Headings. The headings of the paragraphs in this Consent
       Decree are inserted for convenience only and are not intended to
       affect the meaning or interpretation of this Consent Decree.

   20. Authorized Representative. The individual signing this Consent Decree
       on behalf of Airadigm represents and warrants that she is authorized
       by Airadigm to execute this Consent Decree and to bind the company to
       the obligations set forth herein. The FCC signatory represents that he
       is signing this agreement in his official capacity and that he is
       authorized to execute this Consent Decree.

   21. Counterparts. This Consent Decree may be signed in any number of
       counterparts (including by facsimile), each of which, when executed
       and delivered, shall be an original, and all of which counterparts
       together shall constitute one and the same fully executed instrument.

   ________________________________

   John D. Poutasse

   Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division

   Enforcement Bureau

   ________________________________

   Date

   ________________________________

   Linda J. Springer

   Director of Finance and Accounting

   Airadigm Communications, Inc. dba AirFire Mobile

   ________________________________

   Date

   47 C.F.R. S:S: 1.1307(a)(4), 1.1312(a).

   47 U.S.C. S:S: 154(i), 503(b).

   47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.311.

   47 C.F.R. S:S: 1.1307(a)(4), 1.1312(a).

   See, e.g., 42 U.S.C. S:S: 4321-4335.

   See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 1.1307(a)(4), 1.1312(a).

   47 C.F.R. S: 1.1312(a)("In the case of facilities for which no Commission
   authorization prior to construction is required by the Commission's rules
   and regulations, the licensee or applicant shall initially ascertain
   whether the proposed facility may have a significant environmental impact
   as defined in S: 1.1307 of this part.").

   See 47 C.F.R. Part 1, App. B ("Collocation Agreement"); see also Wireless
   Telecommunications Bureau Announces Execution of Programmatic Agreement
   with respect to Collocating Wireless Antennas on Existing Structures,
   Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 5574 (WTB 2001), recon. denied, 20 FCC Rcd 4084
   (WTB 2005).

   See 47 C.F.R. Part 1, App. C ("Nationwide Agreement"); see also Nationwide
   Programmatic Agreement Regarding the Section 106 National Historic
   Preservation Act Review Process, Report and Order, WT Docket No. 03-128,
   20 FCC Rcd 1073 (2004), clarified, 20 FCC Rcd 17995 (2005), aff'd,
   CTIA-The Wireless Ass'n. v. FCC, No. 05-1008 (D.C. Cir. September 26,
   2006) ("Nationwide Agreement Report and Order").

   Section 1.1307(a)(4) of the Rules incorporates by reference the
   Collocation Agreement and the Nationwide Agreement. The Nationwide
   Agreement attaches standardized packets for review of collocated antenna
   construction (FCC Form 621) and new tower construction (FCC Form 620). See
   Nationwide Agreement Report and Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 1180-1201, Appendix
   B, Attachments 3 and 4.

   16 U.S.C. S: 470 et seq. The NHPA requires that a federal agency consider
   the effects of its federal undertakings, including actions that it
   authorizes or approves, on historic properties prior to issuing federal
   licenses, permits, or approvals. See 16 U.S.C. S:S: 470f, 470w(7). In
   considering such effects, the NHPA further requires the federal agency to
   consider the views of expert agencies. Specifically, the NHPA requires the
   federal agency to consider the views of the Advisory Council on Historic
   Preservation, the agency tasked with the responsibility for implementing
   the NHPA, the appropriate State Historic Preservation Officer, and, if
   affected historic properties are of religious or cultural significance to
   Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations, their representatives. See
   16 U.S.C. S:S: 470a(a)(3), (d)(6)(B), 470f, 470i. Consistent with the
   Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's regulations, the Commission's
   Environmental Rules delegate the task of identification and initial
   consideration of the effects that proposed facilities may have on historic
   properties, including identifying and ensuring contact is made with
   potentially affected Indian Tribes, to its licensees, permittees and
   applicants, but the Commission remains ultimately responsible for
   enforcement of the Environmental Rules. See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.1307(a)(4); see
   also 36 C.F.R. S: 800.2(a)(3); Nationwide Agreement Report and Order, 20
   FCC Rcd at 1076-77 P: 5.

   See 36 C.F.R. S: 800.1 et seq. Under the NHPA and the Advisory Council's
   implementing regulations, a federal agency may, with the agreement of the
   Advisory Council and the relevant State Historic Preservation Officer or
   the National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers, adopt
   Programmatic Agreements to tailor the historic preservation review and
   consultation procedures, as well as exempt actions that are unlikely to
   affect historic properties. See 16 U.S.C. S: 470v; 36 C.F.R. S:
   800.14(b),(c).

   See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.1307(a)(4).

   Id., Appendix A, Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for Review of Effects
   on Historic Properties for Certain Undertakings Approved by the Federal
   Communications Commission.

   47 C.F.R. S: 1.1306.

   47 C.F.R. S: 1.1307.

   47 C.F.R. S: 1.16.

   Federal Communications Commission DA 11-1586

   5

   Federal Communications Commission DA 11-1586