Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version


This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.


                                   Before the

                       Federal Communications Commission

                             Washington, D.C. 20554

     In the Matter of                    )   File No. EB-09-TC-087       
     Dezco Communications, Inc.          )   NAL/Acct. No. 200932170046  
     Apparent Liability for Forfeiture   )   FRN: 0012244745             


   Adopted: July 26, 2011 Released: July 27, 2011

   By the Chief, Telecommunications Consumers Division, Enforcement Bureau:

   1. In this Order, which follows upon our Omnibus Notice of Apparent
   Liability for Forfeiture ("Omnibus NAL"), we determine that no forfeiture
   penalty should be imposed on Dezco Communications, Inc. ("Dezco

   2. In the Omnibus NAL, we found Dezco Communications apparently liable for
   a forfeiture for repeatedly violating section 222 of the Communications
   Act of 1934, as amended (the "Communications Act" or "Act"), section
   64.2009(e) of the Commission's rules, and the Commission's EPIC CPNI
   Order, because it appeared that the Company had not filed a timely CPNI
   compliance certification for calendar years 2007 and 2008. Consistent with
   section 503(b)(4) of the Act, Dezco Communications was granted an
   opportunity to show, in writing, why no such forfeiture should be imposed.

    3. Upon review of the record, and based upon additional information
       provided by Dezco

   Communications, we agree that no forfeiture penalty should be imposed.

    4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 503(b) of the

   Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 0.111, 0.311, and
   1.80(f)(4) of the Commission's rules, the proposed forfeiture issued to
   Dezco Communications WILL NOT BE IMPOSED.

    5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be sent by First
       Class Mail

   and Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to Dezco Communications, Inc.,
   Attn. Ronald F. Zeiler, President, 13506 S. Kenton St., Crestwood, IL


   Richard A. Hindman


   Telecommunications Consumers Division

   Enforcement Bureau

   Annual CPNI Certification, Omnibus Notice of Apparent Liability for
   Forfeiture, 25 FCC Rcd 1790 (Enf. Bur. 2010) ("Omnibus NAL").

   47 U.S.C. S: 222.

   47 C.F.R. S: 64.2009(e).

   Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Telecommunications
   Carriers' Use of Customer

   Proprietary Network Information and Other Customer Information; IP-Enabled
   Services, CC Docket No. 96-115;

   WC Docket No. 04-36, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed
   Rulemaking, 22 FCC Rcd 6927, 6953 (2007) ("EPIC CPNI Order"); aff'd sub
   nom. Nat'l Cable & Telecom. Assoc. v. FCC, 555 F.3d 996 (D.C. Cir. 2009).

   (Continued from previous page)


   Federal Communications Commission DA 11-1258


   Federal Communications Commission DA 11-1258