Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
January 12, 2010
DA 10-35
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
AND E-MAIL (jmorris@bowse-law.com) AND FACSIMILE (913) 649-9399
Mr. Leonard Douglas LaDuron
c/o Jeffrey D. Morris
Berkowitz Oliver Williams Shaw & Eisenbrandt, LLP
4200 Somerset, Suite #150
Prairie Village, KS 66208-5213
Re: Notice of Suspension and Initiation of Debarment Proceedings,
File No. EB-10-IH-0108
Dear Mr. LaDuron:
The Federal Communications Commission ("FCC" or "Commission") has received
notice of your guilty plea for conspiracy to commit mail fraud, wire fraud
and making false statements in violation of 18 U.S.C. S:S: 2, 371, 1341,
1343 and 1001 in connection with your participation in the schools and
libraries universal service support mechanism ("E-Rate program").
Consequently, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. S: 54.8, this letter constitutes
official notice of your suspension from the E-Rate program. In addition,
the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") hereby notifies you that we are
commencing debarment proceedings against you.
I. Notice of Suspension
The Commission has established procedures to prevent persons who have
"defrauded the government or engaged in similar acts through activities
associated with or related to the schools and libraries support mechanism"
from receiving the benefits associated with that program. On June 29,
2009, you, Leonard Douglas LaDuron, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit
mail fraud, wire fraud, and making false statements in connection with
your participation in the E-Rate program. Specifically, between 1999 and
2003, you held yourself out as an E-Rate consultant and salesperson for
the purpose of defrauding the E-Rate Program. You admitted that you and
others devised a scheme to defraud school districts and the E-Rate program
by steering contracts to various companies that directly benefited you,
your conspirators, and your companies, primarily Elephantine Corporation,
Serious ISP, Inc., and Myco Technologies, Inc. In furtherance of the
scheme, you submitted fraudulent and false documents to the Universal
Service Administrative Company ("USAC") claiming schools were paid or
would pay their co-pay, submitted other materially false and fraudulent
documents, and concealed your true identities, ownerships, and
relationships from the school districts to induce schools to select your
companies as service providers in violation of E-Rate Program rules.
Ultimately, your scheme induced at least ten schools, in seven different
states, to award contracts to your companies.
On December 23, 2009, you were sentenced to serve fifty-seven months in
federal prison, to be followed by thirty-six months of supervised release
for your role in the scheme to defraud the E-Rate program. You were also
ordered to pay $238,609 in restitution for your role in the scheme.
Pursuant to section 54.8 of the Commission's rules, your conviction
requires the Bureau to suspend you from participating in any activities
associated with or related to the schools and libraries support mechanism.
Such activities include the receipt of funds or discounted services
through the schools and libraries support mechanism, or consulting with,
assisting, or advising applicants or service providers regarding the
schools and libraries support mechanism.
Your suspension becomes effective upon the earlier of your receipt of this
letter or publication of notice in the Federal Register, pending the
Bureau's final debarment determination. In accordance with the
Commission's debarment rules, you may contest this suspension or the scope
of this suspension by filing arguments in opposition to the suspension,
with any relevant documentation. Your request must be received within 30
days after you receive this letter or after notice is published in the
Federal Register, whichever comes first. Such requests, however, will not
ordinarily be granted. The Bureau may reverse or limit the scope of
suspension only upon a finding of extraordinary circumstances. The Bureau
will decide any request for reversal or modification of suspension within
90 days of its receipt of such request.
II. Initiation of Debarment Proceedings
Your guilty plea and conviction of criminal conduct in connection with the
E-Rate program, in addition to serving as a basis for immediate suspension
from the program, also serves as a basis for the initiation of debarment
proceedings against you. Your conviction falls within the categories of
causes for debarment defined in section 54.8(c) of the Commission's rules.
Therefore, pursuant to section 54.8 of the Commission's rules, your
conviction requires the Bureau to commence debarment proceedings against
you.
As with your suspension, you may contest debarment or the scope of the
proposed debarment by filing arguments and any relevant documentation
within 30 calendar days of the earlier of the receipt of this letter or of
publication in the Federal Register. Absent extraordinary circumstances,
the Bureau will debar you. The Bureau will decide any request for reversal
or limitation of debarment within 90 days of receipt of such request. If
the Bureau decides to debar you, its decision will become effective upon
the earlier of your receipt of a debarment notice or publication of the
decision in the Federal Register.
If and when your debarment becomes effective, you will be prohibited from
participating in activities associated with or related to the schools and
libraries support mechanism for three years from the date of debarment.
The Bureau may, if necessary to protect the public interest, extend the
debarment period.
Please direct any response, if by messenger or hand delivery, to Marlene
H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street,
S.W., Room TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554, to the attention of Rebekah
Bina, Attorney Advisor, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement
Bureau, Room 4-C330, with a copy to Michele Levy Berlove, Acting Assistant
Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau, Room
4-C330, Federal Communications Commission. If sent by commercial overnight
mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail), the
response should be sent to the Federal Communications Commission, 9300
East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, Maryland 20743. If sent by
first-class, Express, or Priority mail, the response should be sent to
Rebekah Bina, Attorney Advisor, Investigations and Hearings Division,
Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street,
S.W., Room 4-C330, Washington, DC, 20554, with a copy to Michele Levy
Berlove, Acting Assistant Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division,
Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street,
S.W., Room 4-C330, Washington, DC, 20554. You shall also transmit a copy
of the response via email to Rebekah.Bina@fcc.gov and to
Michele.Berlove@fcc.gov.
If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Bina via mail, by telephone
at (202) 418-7931 or by e-mail at Rebekah.Bina@fcc.gov. If Ms. Bina is
unavailable, you may contact Ms. Michele Levy Berlove, Acting Assistant
Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, by telephone at (202)
418-1477 and by e-mail at Michele.Berlove@fcc.gov.
Sincerely,
Hillary S. DeNigro
Chief
Investigations and Hearings Division
Enforcement Bureau
cc: Marietta Parker, United States Attorney's Office, Department of
Justice (via e-mail)
Kristy Carroll, Esq., Universal Service Administrative Company (via
e-mail)
Any further reference in this letter to "your conviction" refers to your
guilty plea and subsequent conviction of counts one and three for
conspiracy to commit mail fraud, wire fraud and making false statements.
United States v. Leonard Douglas LaDuron, Criminal Docket No.
2:08CR20055-001-KHV, Petition to Enter Plea (D. Kan. filed June 29, 2009
and entered June 30, 2009) ("Leonard LaDuron Plea"); United States v.
Leonard Douglas LaDuron, Criminal Docket No. 2:08CR20055-001-KHV, Judgment
(D. Kan. filed and entered Dec. 23, 2009) ("Leonard LaDuron Judgment").
See also United States v. Leonard Douglas "Doug" LaDuron, Criminal Docket
No. 2:08CR20055-001-KHV, Indictment, 1-10, 11-14 (D. Kan. filed Apr. 24,
2009 and entered Apr. 25, 2009)(Counts 1 and 3)("LaDuron Indictment").
47 C.F.R. S: 54.8. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 0.111 (delegating to the
Enforcement Bureau authority to resolve universal service suspension and
debarment proceedings). The Commission adopted debarment rules for the
schools and libraries universal service support mechanism in 2003. See
Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, Second Report
and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202
(2003) ("Second Report and Order") (adopting section 54.521 of the
Commission's rules to suspend and debar parties from the E-Rate program).
In 2007, the Commission extended the debarment rules to apply to all of
the Federal universal service support mechanisms. Comprehensive Review of
the Universal Service Fund Management, Administration, and Oversight;
Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service; Schools and Libraries
Universal Service Support Mechanism; Lifeline and Link Up; Changes to the
Board of Directors for the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc.,
Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 16372, 16410-12 (2007) (Program Management
Order) (renumbering section 54.521 of the universal service debarment
rules as section 54.8 and amending subsections (a)(1), (5), (c), (d),
(e)(2)(i), (3), (e)(4), and (g)).
Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 9225, P: 66. The Commission's
debarment rules define a "person" as "[a]ny individual, group of
individuals, corporation, partnership, association, unit of government or
legal entity, however, organized." 47 C.F.R. S: 54.8(a)(6).
Also known as Doug LaDuron. See Leonard LaDuron Indictment.
See supra note 1. See Leonard LaDuron Plea. See also Department of Justice
Press Release (Dec. 16, 2009), available at
http://kansascity.fbi.gov/dojpressrel/pressrel09/kc121609a.htm (DOJ
December 2009 Press Release).
LaDuron Indictment at 4-5.
LaDuron Indictment at 4; Leonard LaDuron Plea at 1-2.
LaDuron Indictment at 4-10, 11-12; Leonard LaDuron Plea at 1-3.
LaDuron Indictment at 8. See also DOJ December 2009 Press Release at 1
See Leonard LaDuron Judgment at 1-3, 5 (ordering $238,609 for your role in
the schemes; $217,771 in restitution to USAC and $20,838). See also DOJ
December 2009 Press Release at 1.
47 C.F.R. S: 54.8(b)-(e); see also 47 C.F.R. S: 54.8(a)(4). See also
Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 9225-27, P:P: 67-74.
47 C.F.R. S: 54.8(a)(1); see also 47 C.F.R. S: 54.8(a)(3).
47 C.F.R. S: 54.8(a)(7), (e)(1); see also Second Report and Order, 18 FCC
Rcd at 9226, P: 69..
47 C.F.R. S: 54.8(e)(4).
Id.
Id.
47 C.F.R. S: 54.8(e)(5).
See Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 9226, P: 70; 47 C.F.R. S:
54.8(e)(5),(f).
"Causes for suspension and debarment are the conviction of or civil
judgment for attempt or commission of criminal fraud, theft, embezzlement,
forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false
statements, receiving stolen property, making false claims, obstruction of
justice and other fraud or criminal offense arising out of activities
associated with or related to the schools and libraries support
mechanism." 47 C.F.R. S: 54.8(c). Such activities "include the receipt of
funds or discounted services through [the Federal universal service]
support mechanisms, or consulting with, assisting, or advising applicants
or service providers regarding [the Federal universal service] support
mechanism." 47 C.F.R. S: 54.8(a)(1).
See 47 C.F.R. S: 54.8(b), (c).
See 47 C.F.R. S: 54.8(e)(3), (e)(5); see also Second Report and Order, 18
FCC Rcd at 9226, P: 70.
47 C.F.R. S: 54.8(e)(5); see also Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at
9227, P: 74.
See 47 C.F.R. S: 54.8(e)(5), (f); see also Second Report and Order, 18
FCC Rcd at 9226, P: 70; .
47 C.F.R. S: 54.8(e)(5). The Commission may reverse a debarment or may
limit the scope or period of debarment upon a finding of extraordinary
circumstances, following the filing of a petition by you or an interested
party or upon motion by the Commission. 47 C.F.R. S: 54.8(f).
Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 9225, P: 67; 47 C.F.R. S:
54.8(d),(g).
47 C.F.R. S: 54.8(g).
Mr. Leonard Douglas LaDuron
January 12, 2010
Page 2 of 5
Federal Communications Commission
Enforcement Bureau
Investigations and Hearings Division
445 12th Street, SW, Suite 4-C330
Washington, D.C. 20554