Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the Matter of Rama Communications, Inc. Licensee of Station WRHB
Leesburg, FL 34748 Facility ID # 73913 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File Number:
EB-09-TP-0067 NAL/Acct. No. 201132700001 FRN: 0005023643
NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE
Adopted: November 1, 2010 Released: November 3, 2010
By the District Director, Tampa Office, South Central Region, Enforcement
Bureau:
I. INTRODUCTION
1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find
that Rama Communications, Inc. ("Rama"), licensee of AM station WRHB,
in Leesburg, Florida, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated
Sections 73.1125(a) and 73.3526 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules")^
by failing to maintain full-time managerial and staff personnel at its
main studio and failing to maintain and make available a complete
public inspection file. We conclude that Rama is apparently liable for
a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000).
II. BACKGROUND
2. On September 3, 2009, in response to a complaint, agents from the
Enforcement Bureau's Tampa Office ("Tampa Office") conducted an
inspection during normal business hours of AM Station WRHB's main
studio and transmitter location in Leesburg, Florida.^ During the
inspection, agents from the Tampa Office questioned all of the
individuals present at the main studio, and each stated that they were
employed by Heartbeat Radio. No managerial or staff personnel employed
by Rama were present at the main studio or at the transmitter site.
Heartbeat Radio provides programming for Station WRHB pursuant to a
time brokerage agreement with Rama.^ During the inspection, the agents
also requested to inspect the station's public inspection file. The
staff employed by Heartbeat Radio was unable to produce a complete
public inspection file for the station. The public inspection file
that was produced did not contain, among other things, any issues/
programs lists after June 12, 2007, or a copy of the time brokerage
agreement. While agents were at the station, Rama faxed to the main
studio a current copy of its time brokerage agreement with Heartbeat
Radio.
3. On October 8, 2009, during normal business hours, agents from the
Tampa Office revisited Station WRHB's main studio in Leesburg, Florida
and found two individuals present at the main studio. The owner of
Heartbeat Radio stated over the telephone that one of the two
individuals present at the main studio was employed by Rama and had
begun working at the station less than two weeks prior. The two people
present were unaware of any other Rama employees working at the main
studio prior to the recent addition of this Rama employee. The Rama
employee confirmed that she started less than two weeks ago, was
unfamiliar with the management and operation of the station, and did
not appear to have any managerial authority over the station.
III. DISCUSSION
4. Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"),^
provides that any person who willfully or repeatedly fails to comply
substantially with the terms and conditions of any license, or
willfully or repeatedly fails to comply with any of the provisions of
the Act or of any rule, regulation or order issued by the Commission
thereunder, shall be liable for a forfeiture penalty. The term
"willful" as used in section 503(b) of the Act has been interpreted to
mean simply that the acts or omissions are committed knowingly.^ The
term "repeated" means the commission or omission of such act more than
once or for more than one day.^
5. Section 73.1125(a) of the Rules requires broadcast stations to
maintain a main studio.^ The Commission has interpreted section
73.1125 (also known as the "Main Studio Rule") to require, among other
things, that a licensee maintain a "meaningful management and staff
presence" at its main studio.^ Specifically, the Commission has found
that a main studio "must, at a minimum, maintain full-time managerial
and full-time staff personnel."^
6. As discussed above, on September 3, 2009, no full-time managerial or
full-time staff personnel employed by Rama were present at Station
WRHB's main studio during normal business hours. On October 8, 2009, a
full-time staff person employed by Rama was present at the main
studio, but all Rama and Heartbeat Radio personnel agreed that Rama
maintained no personnel at the main studio prior to September 23,
2009. There is no evidence that Rama ever maintained a full-time
managerial presence at the main studio. The transmitter site was also
unstaffed on September 3, 2009 and on October 8, 2009. Based on the
evidence before us, we find that Rama apparently willfully and
repeatedly violated section 73.1125(a) of the Rules by failing to
maintain full-time managerial personnel at Station WRHB's main studio
from September 3, 2009 until October 8, 2009, and failing to maintain
full-time staff personnel at the main studio from September 3, 2009
until September 23, 2009.
7. Section 73.3526 of the Rules states that "[e]very permittee or
licensee of an AM, FM, TV or a Class A station in the commercial
broadcast services shall maintain a public inspection file containing
the material" set forth in this section.^ Section 73.3526(e)(12) of
the Rules states that "every three months a list of programs that
have provided the station's most significant treatment of community
issues during the preceding three month period [must be maintained in
the public inspection file]. [ . . . ] The lists described in this
paragraph shall be retained in the public inspection file until final
action has been taken on the station's next license renewal
application."^ The public inspection file must be maintained at the
main studio of the station,^ and must be available for public
inspection at any time during regular business hours.^ Section
73.3526(e)(14) of the Rules states that "a copy of every agreement or
contract involving time brokerage of the licensee's station or of
another station by the licensee ... shall be retained as long as the
contract or agreement is in force [in the public inspection file]."^
8. As discussed above, on September 3, 2009, in response to a request to
inspect Station WRHB's public inspection file during regular business
hours, the staff of Heartbeat Radio was unable to produce a complete
public inspection file. The file produced was missing the most recent
eight issues/programs lists as well as a copy of Rama and Heartbeat
Radio's time brokerage agreement. Although Rama ultimately faxed the
current copy of its current time brokerage agreement for the station
during the inspection, it was unable to produce any of the missing
issues/programs lists. There is no evidence that Station WRHB ever had
a complete public inspection file. Based on the evidence before us,
we find that Rama apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section
73.3526 of the Rules by failing to maintain a complete public
inspection file and apparently willfully violated Section 73.3526 of
the Rules by failing to make available a complete public inspection
file.
9. Pursuant to the Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Section
1.80 of the Rules, the base forfeiture amount for violations of the
Main Studio Rule is $7,000, and the base forfeiture amount for not
maintaining or making available a public inspection file is $10,000.^
In assessing the monetary forfeiture amount, we must also take into
account the statutory factors set forth in Section 503(b)(2)(E) of the
Act, which include the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of
the violations, and with respect to the violator, the degree of
culpability, any history of prior offenses, ability to pay, and other
such matters as justice may require.^ Rama previously violated
Sections 73.1125(a) and 73.3526 of the Rules and has received prior
forfeitures and Notices of Violation for these violations.^
Accordingly, we believe an upward adjustment of the forfeiture is
warranted. Thus, applying the Forfeiture Policy Statement, Section
1.80 of the Rules, and the statutory factors to the instant case, we
conclude that Rama is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount
of $25,000. We caution Rama that future violations of Commission rules
may result in more severe enforcement penalties, including
significantly larger forfeitures.^
IV. ORDERING CLAUSES
10. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 503(b) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 0.111, 0.311,
0.314 and 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, Rama Communications, Inc. is
hereby NOTIFIED of this APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE in the
amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for violations of
sections 73.1125(a) and 73.3526 of the Rules.^
11. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.80 of the
Commission's Rules within thirty days of the release date of this
Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, Rama Communications, Inc.
SHALL PAY the full amount of the proposed forfeiture or SHALL FILE a
written statement seeking reduction or cancellation of the proposed
forfeiture.
12. Payment of the forfeiture must be made by credit card, check or
similar instrument, payable to the order of the Federal Communications
Commission. The payment must include the Account Number and FRN Number
referenced above. Payment by check or money order may be mailed to
Federal Communications Commission, P.O. Box 979088, St. Louis, MO
63197-9000. Payment by overnight mail may be sent to U.S. Bank -
Government Lockbox #979088, SL-MO-C2-GL, 1005 Convention Plaza, St.
Louis, MO 63101. Payment by wire transfer may be made to ABA Number
021030004, receiving bank TREAS/NYC, and account number 27000001. For
payment by credit card, an FCC Form 159 (Remittance Advice) must be
submitted. When completing the FCC Form 159, enter the NAL/Account
number in block number 23A (call sign/other ID), and enter the letters
"FORF" in block number 24A (payment type code). Requests for full
payment under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief Financial
Officer -- Financial Operations, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 1-A625,
Washington, D.C. 20554.^ If you have questions, please contact the
Financial Operations Group Help Desk at 1-877-480-3201 or Email:
ARINQUIRIES@fcc.gov. Rama Communications, Inc. shall also send
electronic notification on the date said payment is made to
SCR-Response@fcc.gov.
13. The written statement seeking reduction or cancellation of the
proposed forfeiture, if any, must include a detailed factual statement
supported by appropriate documentation and affidavits pursuant to
sections 1.80(f)(3) and 1.16 of the Rules. The written statement must
be mailed to Federal Communications Commission, Enforcement Bureau,
South Central Region, Tampa Office, 4010 W Boy Scout Blvd, Suite 425,
Tampa, FL 33607 and must include the NAL/Acct. No. referenced in the
caption. The statement should also be mailed to SCR-Response@fcc.gov.
14. The Commission will not consider reducing or canceling a forfeiture in
response to a claim of inability to pay unless the petitioner submits:
(1) federal tax returns for the most recent three-year period; (2)
financial statements prepared according to generally accepted
accounting practices ("GAAP"); or (3) some other reliable and
objective documentation that accurately reflects the petitioner's
current financial status. Any claim of inability to pay must
specifically identify the basis for the claim by reference to the
financial documentation submitted.
15. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability
for Forfeiture shall be sent by Certified Mail, Return Receipt
Requested, and regular mail, to Rama Communications, Inc. at its
address of record.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Ralph Barlow
District Director,
Tampa Office
South Central Region
Enforcement Bureau
^ 47 C.F.R. SS 73.1125(a), 73.3526.
^ At the time of the inspection, the station's call sign was WQBQ. The
call sign was changed to WRHB effective September 7, 2009. For purposes of
this NAL, the station will be referred to as Station WRHB.
^ Time Brokerage Agreement between Heartbeat Radio and Rama.
^ 47 U.S.C. S 503(b).
^ Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 312(f)(1), which applies to
violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the
Act, provides that "[t]he term `willful', when used with reference to the
commission or omission of any act, means the conscious and deliberate
commission or omission of such act, irrespective of any intent to violate
any provision of this Act or any rule or regulation of the Commission
authorized by this Act...." See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting
Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387 (1991), recon. denied, 7
FCC Rcd 3454 (1992).
^ Section 312(f)(2) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 312(f)(2), which also applies
to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of
the Act, provides that "[t]he term `repeated', when used with reference to
the commission or omission of any act, means the commission or omission of
such act more than once or, if such commission or omission is continuous,
for more than one day."
^ 47 C.F.R. S 73.1125(a).
^ Amendment of Sections 73.1125 and 73.1130 of the Commission's Rules, the
Main Studio and Program Origination Rules for Radio and Television
Broadcast Stations, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 3 F.C.C.R. 5024, 5026
(1988), erratum issued, 3 FCC Rcd 5717 (1988) (correcting language in
n.29).
^ See Jones Eastern of the Outer Banks, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and
Order, 6 FCC Rcd 3615, 3616 (1991) ("Jones Eastern") (noting that, "This
is not to say that the same staff person and manager must be assigned
full-time to the main studio. Rather, there must be management and staff
presence on a full-time basis during normal business hours to be
considered `meaningful.'"), clarified, 7 FCC Rcd 6800 (1992) ("Jones
Eastern II"). See also Birach Broadcasting Corporation, Notice of Apparent
Liability, 25 FCC Rcd 2635 (Enf. Bur. 2010).
^ 47 C.F.R. S 73.3526(a)(2).
^ 47 C.F.R. S 73.3526(e)(12).
^ 47 C.F.R. S 73.3526(b).
^ 47 C.F.R. S 73.3526(c).
^ 47 C.F.R. S 73.3526(e)(14).
^ The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section
1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and
Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), ("Forfeiture Policy Statement"), recon.
denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. S 1.80.
^ 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(2)(E).
^ See Rama Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 22 FCC Rcd 13796 (Enf.
Bur. 2007) (finding Rama violated, among other Rules, Sections 73.1125(a)
and 73.3526); see also Rama Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 23 FCC
Rcd 14931 (Enf. Bur. 2008), petition denied, Memorandum Opinion and Order,
23 FCC Rcd 18209 (Enf. Bur. 2008) (finding Rama violated, among other
Rules, Section 73.3526); Rama Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 19
FCC Rcd 24802 (Enf. Bur. 2004), petition denied, Memorandum Opinion and
Order, 22 FCC Rcd 1104 (Enf. Bur. 2007) (finding Rama violated, among
other Rules, Section 73.3526); Rama Communications, Inc., NOV No.
V20063270002 (Tampa Office, May 16, 2006) (finding Rama violated, among
other Rules, Section 73.3526(e)(13)); Rama Communications, Inc., NOV No.
V20053270002 (Tampa Office, November 1, 2004) (finding Rama violated,
among other Rules, Sections 73.3526(e)(8) and 73.3526(e)(12)).
^ We further remind Rama that licensees have a duty to be truthful and
candid with the Commission in all written and oral communications. See 47
C.F.R. S1.17. In addition to monetary forfeitures, violations of this duty
also may subject licensees to license revocation or non-renewal. See,
e.g., 47 U.S.C. S312(a)(1).
^ 47 U.S.C. S 503(b); 47 C.F.R. SS 0.111, 0.311, 0.314, 1.80, 73.1125(a),
73.3526.
^ See 47 C.F.R. S 1.1914.
(...continued from previous page)
(continued....)
Federal Communications Commission DA 10-2094
2
Federal Communications Commission DA 10-2094