Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
)
)
In the Matter of File No. EB-06-TC-4518
)
Mechanicsville Telephone Company NAL/Acct. No. 200732170041
)
Apparent Liability for Forfeiture FRN: 0003748340
)
)
ORDER
Adopted: September 30, 2010 Released: October 1, 2010
By the Assistant Division Chief, Telecommunications Consumers Division,
Enforcement Bureau:
1. In this Order, which follows upon our Notice of Apparent Liability for
Forfeiture ("NAL"), we determine that no forfeiture penalty should be
imposed on Mechanicsville Telephone Company ("Mechanicsville
Telephone").
2. On July 19, 2007, the Enforcement Bureau issued an NAL in the amount
of $100,000 to Mechanicsville Telephone for its apparent violation of
the Commission's rules by failing to prepare and maintain a CPNI
certification that complies with section 64.2009(e). Consistent with
section 503(b)(4) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,
Mechanicsville Telephone was granted an opportunity to show, in
writing, why no such forfeiture should be imposed.
3. In response to the NAL, Mechanicsville Telephone provided evidence
that it was in compliance with the Commission's CPNI rules.
Accordingly, we find that no forfeiture should be imposed.
4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 503(b) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 0.111, 0.311, and
1.80(f)(4) of the Commission's rules, the proposed forfeiture in the
NAL WILL NOT BE IMPOSED.
5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be sent by First
Class Mail and Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to
Mechanicsville Telephone Company to its address of record.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Kimberly A. Wild
Assistant Division Chief
Telecommunications Consumers Division
Enforcement Bureau
In the Matter of Mechanicsville Telephone Company, Notice of Apparent
Liability for Forfeiture, 22 FCC Rcd 13126 (2007) ("NAL").
Id.
(...continued from previous page)
(continued....)
Federal Communications Commission DA 10-1846
2
Federal Communications Commission DA 10-1846