Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
)
In the Matter of ) File No. EB-06-TC-4731
New Talk, Inc. f/k/a Connect Paging, ) NAL/Acct. No. 200732170054
Inc. d/b/a Get A Phone
) FRN: 0013394028
)
ORDER
Adopted: September 3, 2010 Released: September 3, 2010
By the Assistant Division Chief, Telecommunications Consumers Division,
Enforcement Bureau:
1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into
between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") of the Federal
Communications Commission ("FCC" or "Commission") and New Talk, Inc.
(formerly known as Connect Paging, Inc. d/b/a Get a Phone)
(collectively "New Talk"). The Consent Decree terminates an
investigation and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL")
by the Bureau against New Talk for possible violation of section 222
of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act" or
"Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 222, and section 64.2009(e) of the Commission's
rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 64.2009(e), regarding New Talk's apparent failure
to file a compliant annual customer proprietary network information
("CPNI") certification pursuant to 64.2009(e).
2. The Bureau and New Talk have negotiated the terms of the Consent
Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is
attached hereto and incorporated by reference.
3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the
facts before us, we find that the public interest would be served by
adopting the Consent Decree, terminating the investigation and
cancelling the NAL.
4. In the absence of material new evidence relating to this matter, we
conclude that our investigation raises no substantial or material
questions of fact as to whether New Talk possesses the basic
qualifications, including those related to character, to hold or
obtain any Commission license or authorization.
5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 503(b)
of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 0.111 and
0.311 of the Commission's Rules, the Consent Decree attached to this
Order IS ADOPTED.
6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above-captioned investigation IS
TERMINATED and the Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture IS
CANCELLED.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Kimberly A. Wild
Assistant Division Chief
Telecommunications Consumers Division
Enforcement Bureau
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
)
In the Matter of ) File No. EB-06-TC-4731
New Talk, Inc. f/k/a/ Connect Paging, ) NAL/Acct. No. 200732170054
Inc. d/b/a Get A Phone
) FRN: 0013394028
)
CONSENT DECREE
1. The Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and New Talk, Inc. (formerly known
as Connect Paging, Inc. d/b/a Get A Phone) (collectively known as "New
Talk" or the "Company"), by their authorized representatives, hereby
enter into this Consent Decree for the purpose of terminating the
Enforcement Bureau's investigation into New Talk's possible
noncompliance with the requirements of section 222 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act" or
"Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 222, and section 64.2009(e) of the Commission's
rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 64.2009(e).
I. DEFINITIONS
2. For the purposes of this Consent Decree, the following definitions
shall apply:
a. "Act" means the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.
S: 151 et seq.
b. "Adopting Order" means an Order of the Commission adopting the terms
of this Consent Decree without change, addition, deletion, or
modification.
c. "Bureau" means the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications
Commission.
d. "Commission" and "FCC" mean the Federal Communications Commission and
all of its bureaus and offices.
e. "Compliance Plan" means the program described in this Consent Decree
at paragraph 10.
f. "Effective Date" means the date on which the Commission releases the
Adopting Order.
g. "Investigation" means the investigation commenced by the Bureau's
December 8, 2006, letter of inquiry regarding whether New Talk
violated the requirements of section 222 of the Communications Act and
section 64.2009(e) of the Commission's rules by failing to maintain a
compliant customer proprietary network information ("CPNI")
certification.
h. "New Talk" means New Talk, Inc. (formerly known as Connect Paging,
Inc. d/b/a Get A Phone) and its predecessors-in-interest and
successors-in-interest (collectively "New Talk").
i. "NAL" means Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture.
j. "Parties" means New Talk and the Bureau.
k. "Rules" means the Commission's regulations found in Title 47 of the
Code of Federal Regulations.
II. BACKGROUND
3. Section 222 imposes the general duty on all telecommunications
carriers to protect the confidentiality of their subscribers'
proprietary information. The Commission has issued rules implementing
section 222 of the Act. The Commission required carriers to establish
and maintain a system designed to ensure that carriers adequately
protected their subscribers' CPNI. Section 64.2009(e) is one such
requirement. Pursuant to section 64.2009(e):
A telecommunications carrier must have an officer, as an agent of the
carrier, sign a compliance certificate on an annual basis stating that the
officer has personal knowledge that the company has established operating
procedures that are adequate to ensure compliance with the rules in this
subpart. The carrier must provide a statement accompanying the certificate
explaining how its operating procedures ensure that it is or is not in
compliance with the rules in this subpart.
4. The Bureau has been investigating the adequacy of procedures
implemented by telecommunications carriers to ensure confidentiality
of their subscribers' CPNI, based on concerns regarding the apparent
availability to third parties of sensitive, personal subscriber
information. For example, some companies, known as "data brokers,"
have advertised the availability of records of wireless subscribers'
incoming and outgoing telephone calls for a fee. Data brokers have
also advertised the availability of call information that relates to
certain landline toll calls.
5. As part of its inquiry into these issues, the Bureau sent a LOI to New
Talk on December 8, 2006, directing it to produce the compliance
certificates for the previous five (5) years that it had prepared
pursuant to section 64.2009(e) of the Commission's rules. On March 30,
2007, the Commission issued an NAL against New Talk in the amount of
$4,000 for its apparent failure to respond to a directive of the
Enforcement Bureau. On April 27, 2007, New Talk submitted several
documents in response to the LOI and Failure to Respond NAL. The
Bureau concluded that the documents submitted by New Talk did not
satisfy the requirements set forth in section 64.2009(e) of the
Commission's rules and that New Talk had apparently failed to comply
with the requirement that it have an officer certify on an annual
basis that the officer has personal knowledge that New Talk has
established operating procedures adequate to ensure compliance with
the CPNI rules. Finally, the Bureau concluded that New Talk failed to
provide any compliance certificates for the previous five years.
Accordingly, on August 10, 2007, the Bureau released an NAL against
New Talk proposing a monetary forfeiture of $100,000 for its apparent
failure to comply with section 64.2009(e) of the Commission's rules,
and ordered the Company either to pay the proposed forfeiture or file
a written response within thirty (30) days of the NAL release date
stating why the proposed forfeiture should be reduced or canceled.
Subsequently, New Talk and the Bureau entered into settlement
discussions.
III. TERMS OF AGREEMENT
6. Adopting Order. The Parties agree that the provisions of this Consent
Decree shall be subject to final approval by the Bureau by
incorporation of such provisions by reference in the Adopting Order
without change, addition, modification, or deletion.
7. Jurisdiction. New Talk agrees that the Bureau has jurisdiction over it
and the matters contained in this Consent Decree and has the authority
to enter into and adopt this Consent Decree.
8. Effective Date; Violations. The Parties agree that this Consent Decree
shall become effective on the date on which the FCC releases the
Adopting Order. Upon release, the Adopting Order and this Consent
Decree shall have the same force and effect as any other Order of the
Bureau. Any violation of the Adopting Order or of the terms of this
Consent Decree shall constitute a separate violation of a Bureau
Order, entitling the Bureau to exercise any rights and remedies
attendant to the enforcement of a Bureau Order.
9. Termination of Investigation. In express reliance on the covenants and
representations in this Consent Decree and to avoid further
expenditure of public resources, the Bureau agrees to terminate its
investigation and to cancel the NAL. In consideration for the
termination of said investigation and cancellation of the NAL, New
Talk agrees to the terms, conditions, and procedures contained herein.
The Bureau further agrees that, in the absence of new material
evidence, the Bureau will not use the facts developed in this
investigation through the Effective Date of the Consent Decree, or the
existence of this Consent Decree, to institute, on its own motion, any
new proceeding, formal or informal, or take any action on its own
motion against New Talk concerning the matters that were the subject
of the investigation. The Bureau also agrees that it will not use the
facts developed in this investigation through the Effective Date of
this Consent Decree, or the existence of this Consent Decree, to
institute on its own motion any proceeding, formal or informal, or
take any action on its own motion against New Talk with respect to New
Talk's basic qualifications, including its character qualifications,
to be a Commission licensee or authorized common carrier or hold
Commission authorizations.
10. Compliance Plan. For purposes of settling the matters set forth herein
and to help ensure compliance with the Commission's CPNI rules, New
Talk agrees to take all measures necessary to achieve full compliance
with Section 64.2009(e) of the Commission's rules. New Talk agrees
that, within thirty (30) days, its personnel will be trained as to
when they are and are not authorized to use CPNI. New Talk further
agrees to have an express disciplinary process in place for the
unauthorized use of CPNI, within thirty (30) days. Additionally, New
Talk agrees to send a copy, either electronically or by regular mail,
of its annual 64.2009(e) compliance certificate for each of two years
following the effective date of this Consent Decree to the Chief,
Telecommunications Consumers Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W. Room 4-C244,
Washington, D.C., 20554, and must include the file number listed
above. New Talk will also send an electronic copy of its certification
to other Telecommunications Consumers Division staff as directed by
the Bureau Chief. This Consent Decree will expire two (2) years after
the Effective Date or upon the termination of the certification
requirement set forth in sections 64.2009(e) of the Commission's
rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 64.2009(e), whichever is earlier.
11. Section 208 Complaints; Subsequent Investigations. Nothing in this
Consent Decree shall prevent the Commission or its delegated authority
from adjudicating complaints filed pursuant to section 208 of the Act
against New Talk or its affiliates for alleged violations of the Act,
or for any other type of alleged misconduct, regardless of when such
misconduct took place. The Commission's adjudication of any such
complaint will be based solely on the record developed in that
proceeding. Except as expressly provided in this Consent Decree, this
Consent Decree shall not prevent the Commission from investigating new
evidence of noncompliance by New Talk of the Act, the rules, or the
Order.
12. Voluntary Contribution. New Talk agrees that it will make a voluntary
contribution to the United States Treasury in the amount of three
thousand dollars ($3,000). The contribution will be made within thirty
(30) calendar days after the Effective Date of the Adopting Order. The
payment must be made by check or similar instrument, payable to the
order of the Federal Communications Commission. The payment must
include the NAL/Account Number and FRN Number referenced in the
caption to the Adopting Order. Payment by check or money order may be
mailed to Federal Communications Commission, P.O. Box 979088, St.
Louis, MO 63197-9000. Payment by overnight mail may be sent to U.S.
Bank - Government Lockbox #979088, SL-MO-C2-GL, 1005 Convention Plaza,
St. Louis, MO 63101. Payment by wire transfer may be made to ABA
Number 021030004, receiving bank TREAS/NYC, and account number
27000001. For payment by credit card, an FCC Form 159 (Remittance
Advice) must be submitted. When completing the FCC Form 159, enter
the NAL/Account number in block number 23A (call sign/other ID), and
enter the letters "FORF" in block number 24A (payment type code). New
Talk will also send electronic notification on the date said payment
is made to Johnny.Drake@fcc.gov.
13. Waivers. New Talk waives any and all rights it may have to seek
administrative or judicial reconsideration, review, appeal or stay, or
to otherwise challenge or contest the validity of this Consent Decree
and the Adopting Order, provided the Commission issues an Adopting
Order adopting the Consent Decree without change, addition,
modification, or deletion. New Talk shall retain the right to
challenge Commission interpretation of the Consent Decree or any terms
contained herein. If either Party (or the United States on behalf of
the Commission) brings a judicial action to enforce the terms of the
Adopting Order, neither New Talk nor the Commission shall contest the
validity of the Consent Decree or the Adopting Order, and New Talk
shall waive any statutory right to a trial de novo. New Talk hereby
agrees to waive any claims it may otherwise have under the Equal
Access to Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. S: 504 and 47 C.F.R. S: 1.1501 et
seq., relating to the matters addressed in this Consent Decree.
14. Severability. The Parties agree that if any of the provisions of the
Adopting Order or the Consent Decree shall be invalid or
unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not
invalidate or render unenforceable the entire Adopting Order or
Consent Decree, but rather the entire Adopting Order or Consent Decree
shall be construed as if not containing the particular invalid or
unenforceable provision or provisions, and the rights and obligations
of the Parties shall be construed and enforced accordingly. In the
event that this Consent Decree in its entirety is rendered invalid by
any court of competent jurisdiction, it shall become null and void and
may not be used in any manner in any legal proceeding.
15. Subsequent Rule or Order. The Parties agree that if any provision of
the Consent Decree conflicts with any subsequent rule or Order adopted
by the Commission (except an Order specifically intended to revise the
terms of this Consent Decree to which New Talk does not expressly
consent) that provision will be superseded by such Commission rule or
Order.
16. Successors and Assigns. New Talk agrees that the provisions of this
Consent Decree shall be binding on its successors, assigns, and
transferees.
17. Final Settlement. The Parties agree and acknowledge that this Consent
Decree shall constitute a final settlement between the Parties. The
Parties further agree that this Consent Decree does not constitute
either an adjudication on the merits or a factual or legal finding or
determination regarding any compliance or noncompliance with the
requirements of the Act or the Commission's Rules and Orders.
18. Modifications. This Consent Decree cannot be modified without the
advance written consent of both Parties.
19. Paragraph Headings. The headings of the Paragraphs in this Consent
Decree are inserted for convenience only and are not intended to
affect the meaning or interpretation of this Consent Decree.
20. Authorized Representative. Each party represents and warrants to the
other that it has full power and authority to enter into this Consent
Decree.
21. Counterparts. This Consent Decree may be signed in any number of
counterparts (including by facsimile), each of which, when executed
and delivered, shall be an original, and all of which counterparts
together shall constitute one and the same fully executed instrument.
________________________________
Kimberly A. Wild
Assistant Division Chief
Telecommunications Consumers Division
Enforcement Bureau
________________________________
Date
________________________________
Byron Young
President
New Talk, Inc. (formerly known as Connect Paging, Inc. d/b/a Get A
Phone)
________________________________
Date
47 U.S.C. S: 154(i), 503(b).
47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.311.
See Letter from Marcy Greene, Deputy Division Chief, Telecommunications
Consumers Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission,
to Mr. Byron Young, President, Connect Paging, Inc. d/b/a Get A Phone
(December 8, 2006) ("December 8 LOI").
47 C.F.R. 64.2009(e).
Section 222 of the Communications Act provides that: "Every
telecommunications carrier has a duty to protect the confidentiality of
proprietary information of, and relating to, other telecommunications
carriers, equipment manufacturers, and customers, including
telecommunication carriers reselling telecommunications services provided
by a telecommunications carrier." 47 U.S.C. S: 222.
In the Matter of Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996:
Telecommunications Carriers' Use of Customer Proprietary Network
Information and Other Customer Information and Implementation of the
Non-Accounting Safeguards of Sections 271 and 272 of the Communications
Act of 1934, as amended, Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
13 FCC Rcd 8061 (1998) ("CPNI Order"); see also In the Matter of
Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Telecommunications
Carriers' Use of Customer Proprietary Network Information and Other
Customer Information and Implementation of the Non-Accounting Safeguards
of Sections 271 and 272 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,
Order on Reconsideration and Petitions for Forbearance, 14 FCC Rcd 14409
(1999); In the Matter of Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of
1996: Telecommunications Carriers' Use of Customer Proprietary Network
Information and Other Customer Information and Implementation of the
Non-Accounting Safeguards of Sections 271 and 272 of the Communications
Act of 1934, as amended; 2000 Biennial Regulatory Review -- Review of
Policies and Rules Concerning Unauthorized Changes of Consumers' Long
Distance Carriers, Third Report and Order and Third Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd 14860 (2002).
47 C.F.R. S: 64.2009(e). This rule has been amended since issuance of the
NAL against New Talk. The quoted rule is cited as it was at the time of
the alleged violation.
See, e.g. http://www.epic.org/privacy/iei/.
See id.
See note 1, supra.
In the Matter of Connect Paging, Inc., d/b/a Get A Phone, Notice of
Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 22 FCC Rcd 6303 (March 30, 2007)
("Failure to Respond NAL").
See Letter from Byron T. Young, President, Connect Paging, Inc. d/b/a Get
A Phone, to Marcy Greene, Deputy Division Chief, Telecommunications
Consumers Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission
(April 27, 2007)("response to LOI").
In the Matter of Connect Paging,, Inc. d/b/a Get A Phone,, Notice of
Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 22 FCC Rcd. 15,150 (Enf. Bur. rel.
August 10, 2007) ("NAL").
Id.
Federal Communications Commission DA 10-1663
2
4
Federal Communications Commission DA 10-1663