******************************************************** 
                      NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.

*****************************************************************



                                   Before the

                       Federal Communications Commission

                             Washington, D.C. 20554

   APCC Services, Inc., )

   )

   Complainant, )

   )

   v. ) File No. EB-09-MD-002

   )

   True LD, LLC, )

   West Star Telecommunications, LLC, and )

   Global Access LD, LLC, a/k/a Global Access )

   Telecom, a/k/a Global Access, Inc., )

   )

   Defendants. )

                               ORDER OF DISMISSAL

   Adopted: August 31, 2009 Released: September 2, 2009

   By the Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau:

    1. On February 9, 2009, APCC Services, Inc. ("APCC") filed a formal
       complaint against True LD, LLC, West Star Telecommunications, LLC, and
       Global Access LD, LLC (collectively "Defendants") pursuant to section
       208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"). In its
       Complaint, APCC alleged that Defendants violated sections 201(b) and
       276(b) of the Act by failing to pay dial-around compensation owed to
       certain pay phone providers and failing to meet certain other
       requirements.

    2. After a number of extensions of time, on August 27, 2009, APCC filed a
       Motion to Withdraw Formal Complaint with prejudice, stating that the
       parties have resolved their dispute. Defendants consent to the Motion.
       We are satisfied that dismissing the Complaint with prejudice will
       serve the public interest by promoting the private resolution of
       disputes, and by eliminating the need for further litigation and the
       expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and this
       Commission.

    3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208
       of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. S:S: 154(i),
       154(j), and 208, sections 1.720-1.736 of the Commission's rules, 47
       C.F.R. S:S: 1.720-1.736, and the authority delegated in section 0.111
       and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111 and 0.311,
       that the Complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and that this
       proceeding IS TERMINATED.

   FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

   Alexander P. Starr

   Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division

   Enforcement Bureau

   1 Formal Complaint, File No. EB-09-MD-002 (filed Feb. 9, 2009)
   ("Complaint").

   47 U.S.C. S: 208.

   Complaint at 2, 10-12, 18-20; 47 U.S.C. S:S: 201(b) and 226(b).

   Letter Rulings Granting Extension of Time, File No. EB-09-MD-002 (released
   March 4, 2009; April 30, 2009; May 22, 2009; June 4, 2009; June 19, 2009;
   and July 6, 2009) (granting consent motions extending time for filing
   answer).

   Motion to Withdraw Formal Complaint, File No. EB-09-MD-002 (filed Aug. 27,
   2009) ("Motion").

   (Continued from previous page)

   (continued....)

   Federal Communications Commission DA 09-1983

   2

   Federal Communications Commission DA 09-1983