Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version

******************************************************** 
                      NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.

*****************************************************************



                                   Before the

                       Federal Communications Commission

                             Washington, D.C. 20554


                                             )                               
                                                                             
                                             )                               
     In the Matter of                                                        
                                             )   File No. EB-06-TC-3715      
     AT&T Inc.                                   File No. EB-07-TC-13231     
                                             )                               
     Compliance with the Commission's            File No. EB-07-IH-4088      
                                             )                               
     Rules and Regulations Governing             File No. EB-08-TC-1005      
     Customer                                )                               
                                                 NAL/Acct. No. 200932080017  
     Proprietary Network Information and     )                               
     Universal Service Fund Line-Item            FRN: 0005193701             
     Charges                                 )                               
                                                                             
                                             )                               
                                                                             
                                             )                               


                                     ORDER

   Adopted: January 9, 2009 Released: January 13, 2009

   By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau:

    1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into
       between the Enforcement Bureau (the "Bureau") and AT&T, Inc., on
       behalf of its affiliates (collectively "AT&T" or "the AT&T
       Companies"). The Consent Decree terminates the enforcement proceedings
       initiated by the Enforcement Bureau against the AT&T Companies for
       possible violation of section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of
       1934, as amended ("Act"), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a),
       64.2008(d)(3)(ii), 64.2008(d)(3)(v) and 64.2009(a) of the Federal
       Communication Commission's ("Commission") rules relating to the
       confidentiality of customer proprietary network information, and
       sections 201(b) and 254 of the Act, and sections 54.712(a), 69.131 and
       69.158 of the Commission's rules relating to the recovery of universal
       service fund contributions from end-user customers.

    2. The Bureau and the AT&T Companies have negotiated the terms of the
       Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree
       is attached hereto and incorporated by reference.

    3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the
       facts before us, we find that the public interest would be served by
       adopting the Consent Decree and terminating the investigations.

    4. In the absence of material new evidence relating to this matter, we
       conclude that the Bureau's investigations raise no substantial or
       material questions of fact as to whether the AT&T Companies possess
       the basic qualifications, including those related to character, to
       hold or obtain any Commission license or authorization.

    5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Act,
       and sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's Rules, the Consent
       Decree attached to this Order IS ADOPTED.

    6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above-captioned investigations ARE
       TERMINATED.

    7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order and Consent Decree
       shall be sent by first class mail and certified mail, return receipt
       requested, to Cathy Carpino, General Attorney, AT&T Services Inc.,
       1120 20th Street, N.W., Suite 1000, Washington, D.C. 20036.

   FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

   Kris Anne Monteith

   Chief, Enforcement Bureau

                                   Before the

                       Federal Communications Commission

                             Washington, D.C. 20554


                                            )                                
                                                                             
                                            )                                
     In the Matter of                                                        
                                            )   File No. EB-06-TC-3715 File  
     AT&T Inc.                                  No. EB-07-TC-13231           
                                            )                                
     Compliance with the Commission's           File No. EB-07-IH-4088       
                                            )                                
     Rules and Regulations Governing            File No. EB-08-TC-1005       
     Customer                               )                                
                                                NAL/Acct. No. 200932080017   
     Proprietary Network Information and    )                                
     Universal Service Fund Line-Item           FRN: 0005193701              
     Charges                                )                                
                                                                             
                                            )                                
                                                                             
                                            )                                


                                 CONSENT DECREE

   I. INTRODUCTION

   1. The Enforcement Bureau ("the Bureau") of the Federal Communications
   Commission (the "Commission" or "FCC") and AT&T Inc. on behalf of its
   affiliates (collectively "AT&T" or "the AT&T Companies"), by their
   authorized representative, hereby enter into this Consent Decree for the
   purpose of terminating Bureau investigations into whether the AT&T
   Companies violated section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as
   amended (the Act") and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(3)(ii),
   64.2008(d)(3)(v) and 64.2009(a) of the Commission's rules relating to the
   confidentiality of customer proprietary network information and whether
   the AT&T Companies hereby violated sections 201(b) and 254 of the Act, and
   sections 54.712(a), 69.131 and 69.158 of the Commission's rules relating
   to the recovery of universal service fund contributions from end-user
   customers.

   II. DEFINITIONS

   2. For the purposes of this Consent Decree, the following definitions
   shall apply:

    a. "Act" means the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.
       S: 151 et seq.

    b. "Adopting Order" means an Order of the Commission adopting the terms
       of this Consent Decree without change, addition, deletion, or
       modification.

    c. "AT&T" or "The AT&T Companies" means AT&T Inc., AT&T Connecticut
       (formerly known as The Woodbury Telephone Company), AT&T Corp., AT&T
       Mobility, LLC (formerly known as Cingular Wireless and/or AT&T
       Wireless), BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., Illinois Bell Telephone
       Company, Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc., Michigan Bell Telephone
       Company, The Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Wisconsin Bell Telephone
       Company, SBC Long Distance, LLC, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company,
       Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Nevada Bell Telephone Company and SNET
       America, Inc. and their predecessors-in-interest and
       successors-in-interest.

    d. "AT&T Investigation (EB-07-IH-4088)" means the investigation commenced
       by the Bureau's March 13, 2007 Letter of Inquiry and Supplemental
       Letters of Inquiry.

    e. "AT&T Investigation (EB-07-TC-13231)" means the investigation
       commenced by the Bureau's August 14, 2007 Letter of Inquiry to AT&T.

    f. AT&T Investigation (EB-08-TC-1005)" means the investigation commenced
       by the Bureau's January 31, 2008 Letter of Inquiry to AT&T.

    g. "BellSouth Investigation (EB-06-TC-3715)" means the investigation
       commenced by the Bureau's November 22, 2006 Letter of Inquiry to
       BellSouth.

    h. "Bureau" means the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications
       Commission.

    i. "Commission" and "FCC" mean the Federal Communications Commission and
       all of its bureaus and offices.

    j. "Compliance Plan" means the program described in this Consent Decree
       at paragraph 11.

    k. "Effective Date" means the date on which the Commission releases the
       Adopting Order.

    l. "Parties" means the AT&T Companies and the Commission.

    m. "Rules" means the Commission's regulations found in Title 47 of the
       Code of Federal Regulations.

   III. BACKGROUND

   CPNI Investigations

   3. Section 222 imposes the general duty on all telecommunications carriers
   to protect the confidentiality of their subscribers' proprietary
   information. The Commission has issued rules implementing section 222 of
   the Act. Approval is required before a telecommunications carrier may use,
   disclose, or permit access to its customers' individually identifiable
   CPNI. Prior to soliciting such approval, however, carriers must provide
   customers with notice informing them of their right to restrict the use
   of, disclosure of, and access to their CPNI. Opt-out approval means that
   "a customer is deemed to have consented to the use, disclosure, or access
   to the customer's CPNI if the customer has failed to object thereto within
   the waiting period described in S: 64.2009(d)(1) after the customer is
   provided appropriate notification of the carrier's request." If a carrier
   is using e-mail to provide "opt-out" notices, as is the case here, it must
   allow customers the ability to reply directly to those e-mails in order to
   opt-out. Carriers are obligated to implement a system to track customers'
   CPNI approval before using CPNI.

   4. BellSouth Investigation (EB-07-TC-3715): On July 28, 2006, BellSouth
   Telecommunications, Inc. ("BellSouth") filed with the Commission, a Third
   Supplemental Response to the Enforcement Bureau's Letter of Inquiry
   ("LOI") dated January 27, 2006, reporting failures in its CPNI opt-out
   mechanism that resulted in the unauthorized use of certain customers' CPNI
   in its marketing campaigns. The affected customers included those who had
   elected to restrict the use of their CPNI using a means other than by
   calling the prescribed 800 number as instructed in the CPNI opt-out notice
   (i.e. by calling the Bellsouth business office or by opting out when they
   signed up for service). Also included were new customers whose accounts
   should have been noted as CPNI restricted until BellSouth's 75-day opt-out
   period had expired. On November 22, 2006, the Bureau sent an LOI to
   BellSouth requesting further information regarding the CPNI opt-out
   failures. BellSouth provided its response to the LOI on December 8, 15,
   and 19, 2006.

   5. AT&T Investigation (EB-07-TC-13231): On July 9, 2007, AT&T reported
   that certain new, local service customers in its southwest region were
   sent CPNI notices electronically via e-Confirmations, but were not
   provided with the ability to reply electronically to the notices in order
   to opt-out. On August 6, 2007, AT&T submitted its annual Compliance Report
   in accordance with the terms of the July 7, 2006 Consent Decree executed
   between the Commission and AT&T. The Compliance Report detailed a similar
   inability by some new customers in AT&T Midwest's region to reply
   electronically to the CPNI notices received in the e-Confirmations.
   Additionally, some new customers in AT&T's western region did not receive
   the necessary link in their e-Confirmation notices, which would have
   directed them to the CPNI notice page. On August 14, 2007, the Bureau sent
   an LOI to AT&T requesting further information regarding these issues. AT&T
   provided its response to the LOI on September 13, 2007.

   6. AT&T Investigation (EB-08-TC-1005): On January 18, 2008, AT&T reported
   another failure in its CPNI opt-out mechanism in its west and southwestern
   regions. AT&T directed these customers to call a toll-free number to opt
   out through its CPNI Interactive Voice Response ("IVR") application.
   However, because AT&T migrated the IVR application associated with that
   number to a different server, between December 7, 2007 and January 10,
   2008, customers dialing the toll-free number to opt out could not get
   through, but instead received a busy signal. On January 31, 2008, the
   Bureau sent an LOI to AT&T requesting further information regarding this
   matter. AT&T provided its response to the LOI on February 21, 2008.

   Universal Service Investigation

   7. The Commission's rules require that entities providing interstate
   telecommunications services and certain other providers of interstate
   telecommunications contribute to the federal universal service fund
   ("USF") based upon their interstate and international end-user
   telecommunications revenues.  The Commission does not require contributors
   to recover their universal service contributions from their customers. 
   Instead, the Commission allows contributors to recover their universal
   service contributions from their customers, subject to certain
   requirements.  Specifically, section 54.712 of the Commission's rules
   provides that contribution costs passed through to end-user customers as
   federal universal service line-item charges may not exceed the interstate
   telecommunications portion of the customers' bills multiplied by the
   relevant contribution factor.  In addition, section 201(b) requires that
   all carrier charges, practices, classifications, and regulations "for and
   in connection with" interstate communications services be just and
   reasonable, and gives the Commission jurisdiction to enact rules to
   implement that requirement.

   8. Sections 69.131 and 69.158 of the Commission's rules also prohibit
   certain types of contributors from recovering universal service
   contribution costs from customers participating in the Lifeline program, 
   whereby qualifying low-income consumers may receive telecommunications
   service at reduced charges.  The Commission has determined that
   prohibiting recovery of universal service contributions from Lifeline
   customers helps to increase subscribership by reducing qualifying
   low-income consumers' monthly basic local service charges, consistent with
   the universal service goals of the Act and the Commission's rules.

   9. AT&T Inc. is the holding company of various telecommunications
   companies, including the AT&T Companies, providing service in the United
   States. The AT&T Companies offer interstate telecommunications services
   and are subject to the requirements discussed in paragraphs 7 and 8 above.

   10. On February 2, 2007, the AT&T Companies voluntarily disclosed that one
   of the AT&T Companies had apparently recovered federal USF contribution
   costs from end-user customers in excess of the amounts permitted under
   section 54.712 of the Commission's rules. On March 13, 2007, the Bureau
   initiated an investigation into whether the AT&T Companies may have
   violated the Commission's rules governing the recovery of universal
   service contributions. During the course of the investigation, AT&T
   discovered and revealed that, at various times between 2002 and 2008,
   other AT&T Companies also recovered their USF contributions in amounts
   greater than allowed under the Commission's rules, including the recovery
   of contributions from Lifeline customers. The AT&T Companies assert that
   such recoveries were inadvertent and were the result of billing errors.
   The AT&T Companies have refunded to existing customers the money collected
   from them in excess of that permitted under Commission rules; however, the
   AT&T Companies have not provided refunds to certain of their former
   customers, according to the AT&T Companies, because of the cost and
   difficulty of locating those customers and administering refunds, given
   the small amounts owed to each of them.

   IV. TERMS OF AGREEMENT

   11. Adopting Order. The Parties agree that the provisions of this Consent
   Decree shall be subject to final approval by the Bureau by incorporation
   of such provisions by reference in the Adopting Order without change,
   addition, modification, or deletion.

   12. Jurisdiction. The AT&T Companies agree that the Commission has
   jurisdiction over them and the matters contained in this Consent Decree
   and has the authority to enter into and adopt this Consent Decree.

   13. Effective Date; Violations. The Parties agree that this Consent Decree
   shall become effective on the date on which the Bureau releases the
   Adopting Order. Upon release, the Adopting Order and this Consent Decree
   shall have the same force and effect as any other Order of the Commission.
   Any violation of the Adopting Order or of the terms of this Consent Decree
   shall constitute a separate violation of a Commission  Order, entitling
   the Commission to exercise any rights and remedies attendant to the
   enforcement of a Commission Order.

   14. Termination of Investigations. In express reliance on the covenants
   and representations in this Consent Decree and to avoid further
   expenditure of public resources, the Bureau agrees to terminate its
   investigations. The Parties further agree that this Consent Decree
   reflects a compromise and was entered into by AT&T to avoid further cost
   and inconvenience of the investigations. In consideration for the
   termination of said investigations, the AT&T Companies agree to the terms,
   conditions, and procedures contained herein. The Bureau further agrees
   that in the absence of new material evidence the Bureau will not use the
   facts developed in the investigations through the Effective Date of the
   Consent Decree, or the existence of this Consent Decree, to institute, on
   its own motion, any new proceeding, formal or informal, or take any action
   on its own motion against the AT&T Companies concerning the matters that
   were the subject of the investigations. The Bureau also agrees that it
   will not use the facts developed in this investigation through the
   Effective Date of this Consent Decree, or the existence of this Consent
   Decree, to institute on its own motion any proceeding, formal or informal,
   or take any action on its own motion against the AT&T Companies with
   respect to the AT&T Companies' basic qualifications, including their
   character qualifications, to be a Commission licensee or authorized common
   carrier or hold Commission authorizations.

   15. Compliance Plans. The AT&T Companies agree that they will develop,
   within sixty (60) calendar days from the Effective Date, internal
   Compliance Plans, consistent with the requirements set forth below, to
   help ensure the AT&T Companies' future compliance with the Act, the
   Commission's rules, and the Commission's orders governing
   telecommunications carriers' recovery of universal service contributions
   from end-user customers and confidentiality of customer proprietary
   network information. Those Compliance Plans shall remain in effect for the
   period specified below and shall thereafter automatically sunset.

    a. BellSouth Investigation (EB-06-TC-3715) Compliance Plan:

     a. This Compliance Plan shall be applicable to BellSouth.

     b. AT&T agrees that prior to changing the update mechanism for CPNI
        opt-out indicator updates, it shall identify applicable work groups
        involved in the current and planned update method, verify that the
        mechanism ensures that the CPNI status indicator for each customer is
        appropriately updated in system, and verify that the mechanism
        ensures that for a 30-day minimum period of time after giving notice
        and an opportunity to opt-out, new customers will be excluded from
        marketing lists where CPNI approval is required.

     c. AT&T shall report any non-compliance with this Compliance Plan to the
        Enforcement Bureau within 30 days after the discovery of
        non-compliance.

     d. This Compliance Plan shall remain in effect for two years.

     e. AT&T will certify at the end of the two (2) year term that it is in
        compliance with the terms of the Plan. Such certification must be
        mailed within fifteen (15) days after the two-year anniversary of the
        Effective Date of this Consent Decree.

    b. AT&T Investigation (EB-07-TC-13231) Compliance Plan:

     a. This Compliance Plan shall be applicable to Southwestern Bell
        Telephone Company, Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Nevada Bell
        Telephone Company, Illinois Bell Telephone Company, Indiana Bell
        Telephone Company, Michigan Bell Telephone Company, The Ohio Bell
        Telephone Company, and Wisconsin Bell, Inc.

     b. Designation of CPNI Expert: AT&T shall designate an internal CPNI
        subject matter expert whose work activities shall focus on CPNI
        issues and who shall develop CPNI opt-out notices. This CPNI expert
        shall be used as a resource on CPNI questions within the company.

     c. Establishment of CPNI Compliance Oversight Committee: AT&T shall
        establish a CPNI Compliance Oversight Committee, who shall review the
        status of, and open issues regarding, CPNI projects that are in
        progress.

     d. Reminder Notices to Comply with Plan: AT&T shall distribute an annual
        officer-level communication to its internal marketing organizations
        responsible for managing distribution of CPNI opt-out notices
        reinforcing their obligation to comply with the provisions of the
        Plan.

     e. Training: AT&T shall provide annual training to employees of its
        internal marketing organizations responsible for managing the
        distribution of CPNI opt-out notices. This training will focus on
        federal CPNI opt-out requirements and the terms of this Plan.

     f. AT&T shall report any non-compliance with this Compliance Plan to the
        Enforcement Bureau within 30 days after the discovery of
        non-compliance.

     g. This Compliance Plan shall remain in effect for two years.

     h. AT&T will certify at the end of the two (2) year term that it is in
        compliance with the terms of the Plan. Such certification must be
        mailed within fifteen (15) days after the two-year anniversary of the
        Effective Date of this Consent Decree.

    c. AT&T Investigation (EB-08-TC-1005) Compliance Plan:

     a. This Compliance Plan shall be applicable to Southwestern Bell
        Telephone Company, Pacific Bell Telephone Company, and Nevada Bell
        Telephone Company.

     b. AT&T agrees that prior to migrating an Interactive Voice Response
        application used for CPNI opt-out, it shall identify and notify
        applicable work groups involved in the current and planned migration
        and perform the necessary validation tests to ensure the successful
        connection of the migrated switch to the new server.

     c. AT&T shall report any non-compliance with this Compliance Plan to the
        Enforcement Bureau within 30 days after the discovery of
        non-compliance.

     d. This Compliance Plan shall remain in effect for two years.

     e. AT&T will certify at the end of the two (2) year term that it is in
        compliance with the terms of the Plan. Such certification must be
        mailed within fifteen (15) days after the two-year anniversary of the
        Effective Date of this Consent Decree.

    d. AT&T Investigation (EB-07-IH-4088) Compliance Plan:

         a. This Compliance Plan shall be applicable to the AT&T Companies.

     b. Compliance Training Program. The AT&T Companies will establish and
        maintain a federal USF ("FUSF") compliance training program for
        employees who are directly responsible for aspects of billing the
        FUSF charge. This training program shall address FCC's regulations
        governing FUSF charge requirements, and the application of those
        requirements to the services provided by the AT&T Companies and the
        potential ramifications of failing to comply with the charge
        requirements. Training sessions will be conducted at least annually
        for such employees to ensure compliance with the Act and the FCC's
        regulations and policies and, for new employees who are engaged in
        such activities, within the first sixty (60) days of employment. AT&T
        shall update and enhance the foregoing training as appropriate and
        necessary.

     c. Internal Controls Over Billing the FUSF Charge. AT&T has established,
        and shall maintain, internal control processes designed to ensure
        accurate billing of the FUSF charge.

         i. AT&T has established procedures for determining the applicability
            of the FUSF charge to new services, including volume and/or term
            discount.

         ii. AT&T has established, and shall maintain, an FUSF oversight team
             that will serve as a resource for resolving questions related to
             AT&T compliance with applicable FUSF charge rules and act as a
             central point of contact for FUSF charge requirements throughout
             the company. The oversight team will also oversee the
             development and dissemination of training material and will
             monitor changes in FUSF rules to make sure those changes are
             documented and disseminated appropriately. The oversight team
             includes representatives of the AT&T legal department and the
             AT&T corporate compliance department.

     d. AT&T shall report any non-compliance with this Compliance Plan to the
        Enforcement Bureau within 30 days after the discovery of
        non-compliance.

     e. This Compliance Plan shall remain in effect for two years.

     f. AT&T will file a compliance report with the Commission twenty-four
        (24) months after the Effective Date. The compliance report shall
        include a compliance certificate from an officer, as an agent of the
        AT&T Companies, stating that the officer has personal knowledge that
        AT&T has established operating procedures intended to ensure
        compliance with this Consent Decree, together with an accompanying
        statement explaining the basis for the officer's compliance
        certification.

   16. Compliance Reporting. All compliance reports and certifications shall
   be submitted to the Chief, Telecommunications Consumers Division,
   Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street,
   S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554 and the Chief, Investigations and Hearings
   Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th
   Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554.

   17. Termination Date. Unless stated otherwise, the requirements of this
   Consent Decree will expire twenty-four (24) months after the Effective
   Date or, with respect to those requirements pertaining to the resolution
   of the CPNI investigations (AT&T Investigation (EB-07-TC-13231), AT&T
   Investigation (EB-08-TC-1005) and BellSouth Investigation
   (EB-06-TC-3715)), upon the termination of the opt-out requirements set
   forth in sections 64.2001-2009 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S:
   64.2001-2009, whichever is earlier.

   18. Section 208 Complaints; Subsequent Investigations. Nothing in this
   Consent Decree shall prevent the Commission or its delegated authority
   from adjudicating complaints filed pursuant to section 208 of the Act
   against the AT&T Companies or their affiliates for alleged violations of
   the Act, or for any other type of alleged misconduct, regardless of when
   such misconduct took place. The Commission's adjudication of any such
   complaint will be based solely on the record developed in that proceeding.
   Except as expressly provided in this Consent Decree, this Consent Decree
   shall not prevent the Commission from investigating new evidence of
   noncompliance by the AT&T Companies of the Act, the rules, or the Adopting
   Order.

   19. Voluntary Contribution. The AT&T Companies agree that they will make a
   voluntary contribution to the United States Treasury in the amount of ten
   million eighty thousand six hundred dollars ($10,080,600)  within thirty
   (30) days after the Effective Date. The AT&T Companies have already
   refunded overcharges directly to existing customers.  The voluntary
   contribution includes, among other amounts, certain overcharges that the
   AT&T Companies assert they were unable to refund to certain of their
   former customers. AT&T asserts that it would not be cost-effective to
   pursue additional direct refunds, because the small amount at issue
   relating to each individual former customer (e.g., $0.72 per former
   subscriber) would be far less than the cost of locating these former
   customers and administering further refunds. AT&T therefore asserts that
   it is more appropriate for the AT&T Companies instead to remit these
   amounts to the United States Treasury.  The payment must be made by check
   or similar instrument, payable to the Order of the Federal Communications
   Commission.   The payment must include the Account Number and FRN Number
   referenced in the caption to the Adopting Order.  Payment by check or
   money Order may be mailed to Federal Communications Commission, P.O. Box
   979088, St. Louis, MO 63197-9000.  Payment by overnight mail may be sent
   to U.S. Bank - Government Lockbox #979088, SL-MO-C2-GL, 1005 Convention
   Plaza, St. Louis, MO 63101.  Payments by wire transfer may be made to ABA
   Number 021030004, receiving bank Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and
   account number 27000001.  The AT&T Companies will also send electronic
   notification on the date said payment is made to Johnny Drake at
   Johnny.Drake@fcc.gov and to Michele Levy Berlove at
   Michele.Berlove@fcc.gov.

   20. Waivers. The AT&T Companies waive any and all rights they may have to
   seek administrative or judicial reconsideration, review, appeal or stay,
   or to otherwise challenge or contest the validity of this Consent Decree
   and the Order adopting this Consent Decree, provided the Commission issues
   an Order adopting the Consent Decree without change, addition,
   modification, or deletion. The AT&T Companies shall retain the right to
   challenge Commission interpretation of the Consent Decree or any terms
   contained herein. If either Party (or the United States on behalf of the
   Commission) brings a judicial action to enforce the terms of the Adopting
   Order, neither the AT&T Companies nor the Commission shall contest the
   validity of the Consent Decree or the Adopting Order, and the AT&T
   Companies shall waive any statutory right to a trial de novo. The AT&T
   Companies hereby agree to waive any claims they may otherwise have under
   the Equal Access to Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. S: 504 and 47 C.F.R. S: 1.1501
   et seq., relating to the matters addressed in this Consent Decree.

   21. Subsequent Rule or Order. The Parties agree that if any provision of
   the Consent Decree conflicts with any subsequent rule or Order adopted by
   the Commission (except an Order specifically intended to revise the terms
   of this Consent Decree to which the AT&T Companies do not expressly
   consent) that provision will be superseded by such Commission rule or
   Order.

   22. Successors and Assigns. The AT&T Companies agree that the provisions
   of this Consent Decree shall be binding on their successors, assigns, and
   transferees. 

   23. Final Settlement. The Parties agree and acknowledge that this Consent
   Decree shall constitute a final settlement between the Parties. The
   Parties further agree that this Consent Decree does not constitute either
   an admission of liability, an admission of noncompliance, an adjudication
   on the merits, or a factual or legal finding or determination regarding
   any compliance or noncompliance with the requirements of the Act or the
   Commission's Rules and Orders.

   24. Modifications. This Consent Decree cannot be modified without the
   advance written consent of both Parties.

   25. Paragraph Headings. The headings of the Paragraphs in this Consent
   Decree are inserted for convenience only and are not intended to affect
   the meaning or interpretation of this Consent Decree.

   26. Authorized Representative. Each party represents and warrants to the
   other that it has full power and authority to enter into this Consent
   Decree.

   27. Counterparts. This Consent Decree may be signed in any number of
   counterparts (including by facsimile), each of which, when executed and
   delivered, shall be an original, and all of which counterparts together
   shall constitute one and the same fully executed instrument.

   ________________________________

   Kris A. Monteith

   Chief, Enforcement Bureau

   Federal Communications Commission

   ________________________________

   Date

   ________________________________

   Paul Mancini

   Senior VP & Assistant General Counsel

   AT&T Inc., on behalf of the AT&T Companies

   ________________________________

   Date

   "AT&T" or "The AT&T Companies" means AT&T Inc., AT&T Connecticut (formerly
   known as The Woodbury Telephone Company), AT&T Corp., AT&T Mobility, LLC
   (formerly known as Cingular Wireless and/or AT&T Wireless), BellSouth
   Telecommunications, Inc., Illinois Bell Telephone Company, Indiana Bell
   Telephone Company, Inc., Michigan Bell Telephone Company, The Ohio Bell
   Telephone Company, Wisconsin Bell Telephone Company, SBC Long Distance,
   LLC, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Pacific Bell Telephone Company,
   Nevada Bell Telephone Company and SNET America, Inc. and their
   predecessors-in-interest and successors-in-interest.

   47 U.S.C. S: 222(c)(1).

   47 C.F.R. S:S: 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(3)(ii), 64.2008(d)(3)(v)
   and 64.2009(a).

   47 U.S.C. S:S: 201(b) and 254.

   47 C.F.R. S:S: 54.712(a), 69.131 and 69.158.

   47 U.S.C. S: 154(i).

   47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111,  0.311.

   47 U.S.C. S: 222(c)(1).

   47 C.F.R. S:S: 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(3)(ii), 64.2008(d)(3)(v)
   and 64.2009(a).

   47 U.S.C. S:S: 201(b) and 254.

   47 C.F.R. S:S: 54.712(a), 69.131 and 69.158.

   See Letter from Trent B. Harkrader, Deputy Chief, Investigations and
   Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau, FCC, dated March 13, 2007 ("March
   13, 2007 LOI" or "LOI").

   See Letters from Hillary DeNigro, Chief, Investigations & Hearings
   Division, Enforcement Bureau, FCC, to Mary Henze, Assistant Vice President
   Federal Regulatory, AT&T Inc. and Cathy Carpino, Senior Counsel, AT&T
   Services Inc., dated September 13, 2007 and October 30, 2007
   ("Supplemental LOI" and "Second Supplemental LOI," respectively).

   47 U.S.C S: 222(a).

   In the Matter of Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996:
   Telecommunications Carriers' Use of Customer Proprietary Network
   Information and Other Customer Information and Implementation of the
   Non-Accounting Safeguards of Sections 271 and 272 of the Communications
   Act of 1934, as amended, CC Docket Nos. 96-115 and 96-149, FCC 98-27,
   Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 13 FCC Rcd 8061 (1998)
   ("CPNI Order"); see also, In the Matter of Implementation of The
   Telecommunications Act of 1996 Telecommunications Carriers' Use of
   Customer Proprietary Network Information and Other Customer Information,
   Implementation of the Non-Accounting Safeguards of Sections 271 and 272 of
   the Communications Act of 1934,as amended, Order on Reconsideration and
   Petitions for Forbearance, 14 FCC Rcd 14409 (1999); In The Matter of
   Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996:Telecommunications
   Carriers' Use of Customer Proprietary Network Information and Other
   Customer Information, Implementation of the Non-Accounting Safeguards of
   Sections 271 and 272 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,
   Biennial Regulatory Review -- Review of Policies and Rules Concerning
   Unauthorized Changes of Consumers' Long Distance Carriers, Third Report
   and Order and Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd
   14860 (2002).

   47 C.F.R. S: 64.2007; see also 47 U.S.C. S: 222(c)(1); except that
   carriers may "use, disclose, or permit access to CPNI for the purpose of
   providing or marketing service offerings among the categories of service
   (i.e., local, interexchange, and CMRS) to which the customer already
   subscribes from the same carrier, without customer approval." 47 C.F.R. S:
   64.2005(a).

   47 C.F.R. S: 64.2008(a).

   47 C.F.R. S: 64.2003(i).

   47 C.F.R. S: 64.2008(d)(3)(ii).

   47 C.F.R. S: 64.2009(a).

   See Letter from Colleen Heitkamp, Chief, Telecommunications Consumers
   Division, Enforcement Bureau, to Michelle Thomas, AT&T Inc. (EB File No.
   EB-06-TC-049, January 27, 2006). On December 29, 2006, subsequent to the
   initiation of this investigation, the Commission approved the merger
   between AT&T and Bellsouth. Accordingly, we will hereafter refer to the
   Company as Bellsouth for matters concerning the Bureau's investigation and
   AT&T for any agreements contained herein between the Company and the
   Commission.

   See Letter from Bennett L. Ross, General Counsel - DC, BellSouth
   Corporation, to Colleen Heitkamp, Chief, Telecommunications Consumers
   Division, Enforcement Bureau ("July 28, 2006 Opt-Out Failure Notice").

   Id.

   See Letter of Inquiry from Marcy Greene, Deputy Division Chief,
   Telecommunications Consumers Division, Enforcement Bureau, to Bennett L.
   Ross, General Counsel - DC, BellSouth Corporation (November 22, 2006).

   See Letters from Bennett L. Ross, General Counsel - DC, BellSouth
   Corporation to Colleen Heitkamp, Chief, Telecommunications Consumers
   Division, Enforcement Bureau (December 8, 2006) (December 15, 2006) and
   (December 19, 2006).

   See Notification Under Section 64.2009(f), CC Docket No. 96-115, Letter
   from Davida Grant, Senior Attorney, AT&T Inc., to Christi Shewman, Chief,
   Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, and Erica
   McMahon, Chief, Consumer Policy Division, Consumer & Governmental Affairs
   Bureau, Federal Communications Commission ("July 9, 2007 Opt-Out Failure
   Notice").

   See Annual CPNI Compliance Report, File Nos. EB-05-TC-047 and
   EB-06-TC-059, Letter from Davida Grant, Senior Attorney, AT&T Inc., to
   Colleen Heitkamp, Chief, Telecommunications Consumers Division,
   Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (August 6, 2007)
   ("Compliance Report").

   In the Matter of AT&T Inc., Compliance with the Commission's Rules and
   Regulations Governing Customer Proprietary Network Information, Order, 21
   FCC Rcd 7732 (2006) ("July 7, 2006 Consent Decree").

   Compliance Report at 6.

   Id. at 5.

   See Letter of Inquiry from Marcy Greene, Deputy Division Chief,
   Telecommunications Consumers Division, Enforcement Bureau, to Jackie
   Flemming, Executive Director, Federal Regulatory, AT&T Inc. (August 14,
   2007).

   See Letter from Davida Grant, Senior Attorney, AT&T Inc., to Colleen
   Heitkamp, Chief, Telecommunications Consumers Division, Enforcement Bureau
   (September 13, 2007).

   See Notification Under Section 64.2009(f), CC Docket No. 96-115, Letter
   from Davida Grant, Senior Attorney, AT&T Inc., to Christi Shewman, Chief,
   Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, and Erica
   McMahon, Chief, Consumer Policy Division, Consumer & Governmental Affairs
   Bureau, Federal Communications Commission ("January 18, 2008 Opt-Out
   Failure Notice").

   Id.

   Id.

   See Letter of Inquiry from Marcy Greene, Deputy Division Chief,
   Telecommunications Consumers Division, Enforcement Bureau, to Davida
   Grant, Senior Attorney, AT&T Inc. (January 31, 2008).

   See Letter from Davida Grant, Senior Attorney, AT&T Inc., to Colleen
   Heitkamp, Chief, Telecommunications Consumers Division, Enforcement Bureau
   (February 21, 2008).

   See generally 47 C.F.R. S:S: 54.706 - 54.713 (outlining requirements for
   contributions to the federal universal service support mechanisms). See
   also Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, 1998 Biennial
   Regulatory Review  - Streamlined Contributor Reporting Requirements
   Associated with Administration of Telecommunications Relay Services, North
   American Numbering Plan, Local Number Portability, and Universal Service
   Support Mechanisms, Telecommunications Services for Individuals with
   Hearing and Speech Disabilities, and the Americans with Disabilities Act
   of 1990, Administration of the North American Numbering Plan and North
   American Numbering Plan Cost Recovery Contribution Factor and Fund Size,
   Number Resource Optimization, Telephone Number Portability,
   Truth-in-Billing and Billing Format, Report and Order and Second Further
   Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd 24952 (2002) ("Interim
   Contribution Order").

   See Federal-State Board on Universal Service, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd
   8776, 9210-11, para. 853 (1997) (subsequent history omitted) ("Universal
   Service Order").

   Id.

   47 C.F.R. S: 54.712.

   47 U.S.C. S: 201(b).

   47 U.S.C. 254(b); 47 C.F.R. S:S: 69.131, 69.158.

   47 C.F.R. S:S: 54.400 et seq.

   Interim Contribution Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 24982, para. 62.

   See LOI.

   Federal Communications Commission DA 09-16

                                       2

   Federal Communications Commission DA 09-16

   Federal Communications Commission DA 09-16

                                       11

   Federal Communications Commission DA 09-16