Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
)
)
In the Matter of ) File No. EB-09-TC-143
PriorityOne Telecommunications, Inc. ) NAL/Acct. No. 200932170102
Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ) FRN: 0004272373
)
)
ORDER
Adopted: July 24, 2009 Released: July 24, 2009
By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau:
I. introduction and Background
1. In this Order, we cancel a proposed forfeiture in the amount of three
thousand dollars ($3,000) issued to PriorityOne Telecommunications,
Inc. ("PriorityOne") for apparent violation of section 222 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the "Act"), section 64.2009(e)
of the Commission's rules, and the Commission's EPIC CPNI Order, by
failing to timely file an compliant annual customer proprietary
network information ("CPNI") compliance certification with the
Commission on or before March 1, 2008.
2. On February 29, 2008, PriorityOne filed a certification pursuant to
section 64.2009(e) of the Commission's rules with the Commission's
Secretary. In reviewing the certifications filed, the Bureau
determined that the certification filed by PriorityOne did not comply
with the requirements of the rule. In particular, the Bureau
determined that the certification was not signed by an officer of the
company with personal knowledge and lacked an explanation of actions
taken against databrokers. Accordingly, the Bureau issued to
PriorityOne a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL")
proposing a forfeiture in the amount of three thousand dollars
($3,000) based on PriorityOne's apparent violation of section 222 of
the Act, section 64.2009(e) of the Commission's rules, and the
Commission's EPIC CPNI Order by failing to timely file a complaint
annual compliance certification with the Commission.
II. Discussion
3. In response to the NAL, PriorityOne demonstrated that the
certification filed with the Secretary was in fact in compliance with
the rule. However, the certification was scanned imperfectly into the
Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System ("ECFS") and thus
appeared to the Bureau to be missing certain information. Upon review
of the record, we agree with PriorityOne that our NAL swas in error
because PriorityOne had filed an annual CPNI compliance certificate
that was signed by an officer of the company with personal knowledge
and an explanation of any actions taken against data brokers. For this
reason, the NAL issued to PriorityOne should be cancelled.
4. Accordingly, based on the record, we find that PriorityOne did not
willfully and repeatedly violate section 222 of the Act, section
64.2009(e) of the Commission's rules, and the Commission's EPIC CPNI
Order. Consequently, we conclude that no forfeiture should be imposed.
5. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 503(b) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and sections 0.111,
0.311 and 1.80(f) (4) of the Commission's rules, that the proposed
forfeiture in the amount of three thousand dollars ($3,000) issued to
PriorityOne Telecommunications, Inc. in the February 25, 2009 Notice
of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture for willful and repeated
violations of a Commission rule IS CANCELLED.
6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be sent by First
Class Mail and Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to PriorityOne,
to its attorney of record, attn: James M. Smith, Davis Wright Tremaine
LLP, 1919 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20006.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Kris A. Monteith
Chief, Enforcement Bureau
47 U.S.C. S: 222.
47 C.F.R. S: 64.2009(e).
Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Telecommunications
Carriers' Use of Customer Proprietary Network Information and Other
Customer Information; IP-Enabled Services, CC Docket No. 96-115; WC Docket
No. 04-36, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 22
FCC Rcd 6927, 6953 (2007) ("EPIC CPNI Order"); aff'd sub nom. Nat'l Cable
& Telecom. Assoc. v. FCC, No. 07-132, (D.C. Cir. decided Feb. 13, 2009).
PriorityOne Telecommunications, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for
Forfeiture, -- FCC Rcd --- (Enf. Bur. Feb. 25, 2009) ("NAL").
47 U.S.C. S: 222.
47 C.F.R. S: 64.2009(e).
See e-mail from James M. Smith, Davis, Wright, Tremaine, counsel for
PriorityOne, to Marcy Greene, Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Consumers
Division, Enforcement Bureau (Feb. 25, 2009).
47 U.S.C. S: 222.
47 C.F.R. S: 64.2009(e).
(...continued from previous page)
(continued....)
Federal Communications Commission DA 09-1593
2
Federal Communications Commission DA 09-1593