Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
)
In the Matter of ) File No. EB-08-SE-709
Fox Television Stations, Inc. ) NAL/Acct. No. 200932100062
Earth Station call sign E970411 ) FRN # 0005795067
)
NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE
Adopted: June 3, 2009 Released: June 5, 2009
By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau:
I. introduction
1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find
Fox Television Stations, Inc. ("Fox Television"), licensee of earth
station call sign E970411, apparently liable for a forfeiture in the
amount of twelve thousand eight hundred dollars ($12,800) for
operating its station without Commission authority, in apparent
willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of the Communications
Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and Section 25.102 of the Commission's
Rules ("Rules"), and for failing to file a timely renewal application
for its earth station in apparent willful violation of Section
25.121(e) of the Rules.
II. background
2. On September 26, 1997, WWOR-TV, Inc. was granted a license to operate
a Ku-band satellite earth station under call sign E970411, and that
license was subsequently assigned to Fox Television on October 31,
2000. Under the terms of its license, Fox Television's authorization
for its earth station expired on September 26, 2007. After Fox
Television became aware that it failed to file a renewal application
for the station and that its license to operate the station had
expired, on August 13, 2008, it filed a request with the International
Bureau for special temporary authority ("STA") to operate the earth
station pending grant of an application for a new earth station
license. On August 18, 2008, Fox Television submitted a new license
application, and on August 21, 2008, Fox Television filed an amended
license application. On September 23, 2008, the International Bureau
granted Fox Television's application for a new license for earth
station E970411, as amended, and dismissed the pending STA request as
moot.
3. Because it appeared that Fox Television operated its earth station,
call sign E970411, without authorization, the International Bureau
referred this case to the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") for
investigation and possible enforcement action. On October 6, 2008, the
Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") issued a letter of
inquiry ("LOI") to further investigate whether Fox Television had
operated its earth station beyond the expiration of its license.
4. In its November 4, 2008 Response to the LOI, Fox Television admitted
that it had failed to timely renew its earth station license and that
it continued to operate Station E970411 without Commission authority
through August 13, 2008. According to Fox Television, its engineering
staff believed that renewals had been sought for the license by Fox
Television in-house counsel. Thus, Fox Television claims that it was
unaware that its license for the earth station had expired. Fox
Television states that it first became aware that its license had
expired on August 13, 2008, at which time it took immediate steps to
request an STA to operate its station pending the submission and grant
of a new license application.
III. discussion
5. Section 301 of the Act and Section 25.102(a) of the Rules prohibit the
use or operation of any apparatus for the transmission of energy or
communications or signals by an earth station except under and in
accordance with a Commission granted authorization. Section 25.121(c)
of the Rules provides that the license term for an earth station is
specified in the instrument of authorization. Section 25.121(e) of the
Rules requires the licensee of an earth station to file its renewal
application "no earlier than 90 days, and no later than 30 days,
before the expiration date of the license." Absent a timely filed
renewal application, an earth station license automatically terminates
at the end of the license period.
6. Under the terms of its license, Fox Television's authorization to
operate its earth station, call sign E970411, expired on September 26,
2007. As a Commission licensee, Fox Television is charged with the
responsibility of knowing and complying with the terms of its
authorization, the Act and the Rules. Fox Television admits that it
has operated earth station E970411 without Commission authority after
September 26, 2007. By operating earth station E970411 without
Commission authorization, Fox Television apparently violated Section
301 of the Act and Section 25.102(a) of the Rules. Fox Television also
acted in apparent violation of Section 25.121(e) of the Rules by
failing to file a timely renewal application for the earth station.
7. Section 503(b) of the Act and Section 1.80(a) of the Rules provide
that any person who willfully or repeatedly fails to comply with the
provisions of the Act or the Rules shall be liable for a forfeiture
penalty. For purposes of Section 503(b) of the Act, the term "willful"
means that the violator knew that it was taking the action in
question, irrespective of any intent to violate the Commission's
Rules, and "repeated" means more than once. Based on the record before
us, it appears that Fox Television's violations of Section 301 of the
Act and Section 25.102(a) of the Rules were willful and repeated, and
its violation of Section 25.121(e) of the Rules was willful.
8. In determining the appropriate forfeiture amount, Section 503(b)(2)(E)
of the Act directs us to consider factors, such as "the nature,
circumstances, extent and gravity of the violation, and, with respect
to the violator, the degree of culpability, any history of prior
offenses, ability to pay, and such other matters as justice may
require." Having considered the statutory factors, as explained below,
we propose a total forfeiture of $16,000.
9. Section 1.80(b) of the Rules sets a base forfeiture amount of $10,000
for operation of a station without Commission authority and $3,000 for
failure to file required forms or information. As the Commission has
held, a licensee's continued operations without authorization and its
failure to timely file for authority to extend its operations
constitute separate violations of the Act and the Rules and warrant
the assessment of separate forfeitures. Accordingly, we herein propose
separate forfeiture amounts for Fox Television's separate violations.
10. Consistent with recent precedent, we propose the full base forfeiture
amount of $3,000 for Fox Television's failure to timely file a renewal
application for its earth station. Additionally, we propose a
forfeiture in the amount of $5,000 for Fox Television's unauthorized
operation of its earth station, call sign, E970411 for the
approximately eleven month period between September 26, 2007, the
license expiration, until at least August 13, 2008, the date of the
STA request. In proposing a forfeiture of $5,000 for the unauthorized
operation, we recognize that the Commission considers a licensee who
operates a station with an expired license in better stead than a
pirate broadcaster who lacks prior authority, and thus downwardly
adjust the $10,000 base forfeiture amount accordingly. Thus, we
propose an aggregate forfeiture of $8,000 ($3,000 for failure to
timely file a renewal application and $5,000 for unauthorized
operation).
11. This $8,000 forfeiture amount is subject to adjustment, however. In
this regard, we consider Fox Television's size and ability to pay a
forfeiture. To ensure that forfeiture liability is a deterrent, and
not simply a cost of doing business, the Commission has determined
that large or highly profitable companies, such as Fox Television,
could expect the assessment of higher forfeitures for violations.
Given Fox Television's size and ability to pay a forfeiture, we
conclude that an upward adjustment of the base forfeiture amount to
$16,000 is appropriate.
12. We do find, however, that a downward adjustment of the proposed
forfeiture from $16,000 to $12,800 is warranted because Fox Television
made voluntary disclosures to Commission staff and undertook
corrective measures after learning of its violations but prior to any
Commission inquiry or initiation of enforcement action.
IV. ORDERING CLAUSES
13. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act
and Sections 0.111, 0.311 and 1.80 of the Rules, Fox Television
Stations, Inc. IS hereby NOTIFIED of its APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A
FORFEITURE in the amount of twelve thousand eight hundred dollars
($12,800) for willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of the Act
and Section 25.102(a) of the Rules and for willful violation of
Section 25.121(e) of the Rules.
14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.80 of the Rules,
within thirty days of the release date of this Notice of Apparent
Liability for Forfeiture, Fox Television Stations, Inc. SHALL PAY the
full amount of the proposed forfeiture or SHALL FILE a written
statement seeking reduction or cancellation of the proposed
forfeiture.
15. Payment of the forfeiture must be made by check or similar instrument,
payable to the order of the Federal Communications Commission. The
payment must include the NAL/Account Number and FRN Number referenced
above. Payment by check or money order may be mailed to Federal
Communications Commission, P.O. Box 979088, St. Louis, MO 63197-9000.
Payment by overnight mail may be sent to U.S. Bank - Government
Lockbox #979088, SL-MO-C2-GL, 1005 Convention Plaza, St. Louis, MO
63101. Payment by wire transfer may be made to ABA Number 021030004,
receiving bank TREAS/NYC, and account number 27000001. For payment by
credit card, an FCC Form 159 (Remittance Advice) must be submitted.
When completing the FCC Form 159, enter the NAL/Account number in
block number 23A (call sign/other ID), and enter the letters "FORF" in
block number 24A (payment type code). Requests for full payment under
an installment plan should be sent to: Chief Financial Officer -
Financial Operations, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 1-A625, Washington,
D.C. 20554. Please contact the Financial Operations Group Help Desk at
1-877-480-3201 or Email: ARINQUIRIES@fcc.gov with any questions
regarding payment procedures. Fox Television Stations, Inc., will also
send electronic notification on the date said payment is made to
Deborah Broderson, at Deborah.Broderson@fcc.gov, and to Ricardo
Durham, at Ricardo.Durham@fcc.gov.
16. The response, if any, must be mailed to the Office of the Secretary,
Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington,
D.C. 20554, ATTN: Enforcement Bureau - Spectrum Enforcement Division,
and must include the NAL/Acct. No. referenced in the caption.
17. The Commission will not consider reducing or canceling a forfeiture in
response to a claim of inability to pay unless the petitioner submits:
(1) federal tax returns for the most recent three-year period; (2)
financial statements prepared according to generally accepted
accounting practices; or (3) some other reliable and objective
documentation that accurately reflects the petitioner's current
financial status. Any claim of inability to pay must specifically
identify the basis for the claim by reference to the financial
documentation submitted.
18. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability
for Forfeiture shall be sent by first class mail and certified mail
return receipt requested to Fox Television Stations, Inc., Attention:
Dianne Smith, Vice President, Legal and FCC Compliance, 444 North
Capitol Street NW, Suite 740, Washington DC 20001.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Kathryn S. Berthot
Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division
Enforcement Bureau
47 U.S.C. S: 301.
47 C.F.R. S: 25.102.
47 C.F.R. S: 25.121(e).
See File Nos. SES-ASG-20000918-01719 and SES-MOD-20030205-00194.
See File No. SES-STA-20080813-01058.
See File No. SES-LIC-20080818-01065; see also, File No.
SES-AMD-20080821-01080.
See, Satellite Communication Services Information, Public Notice, Report
No. SES-01071, (International Bureau, September 24, 2008).
Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division,
Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, to Dianne Smith,
Vice President, Fox Television Stations, Inc. (October 6, 2008) ("LOI").
Letter from Dianne Smith, Vice President, Legal and FCC Compliance, Fox
Television Stations, Inc., to Kathryn S. Berthot, Chief, Spectrum
Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications
Commission (November 4, 2008) ("LOI Response").
LOI Response at 1, 3.
Id. at 1.
Id., Declaration of Dianne Smith at P:P: 7-11
47 U.S.C. S: 301; 47 C.F.R. S: 25.102(a).
47 C.F.R. S: 25.121(c).
47 C.F.R. S: 25.121(e).
47 C.F.R. S: 25.161.
See Discussion Radio, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of
Apparent Liability, 19 FCC Rcd 7433, 7437 (2004) ("Discussion Radio"). See
also Side By Side, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 23
FCC Rcd 898, 901 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div. 2008) ("Side By Side"); La
Carpa Corp., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 22 FCC Rcd 2744,
2745 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div. 2007) (forfeiture paid) ("La Carpa");
Lazer Broadcasting Corp., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 21
FCC Rcd 8710, 8712 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div. 2005) (forfeiture paid)
("Lazer"); Shared Data Networks, LLC, Notice of Apparent Liability for
Forfeiture, 20 FCC Rcd 18184, 18186 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div. 2005)
(forfeiture paid) ("Shared Data Networks").
LOI Response at 3.
47 U.S.C. S: 503(b).
47 C.F.R. S: 1.80(a).
See 47 U.S.C. S: 312(f)(1) & (2). See also Southern California
Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387 (1991),
recon. denied, 7 FCC Rcd 3454 (1992) (the definitions of willful and
repeated contained in the Act apply to violations for which forfeitures
are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act).
47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(2)(E). See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80(b)(4), Note to
paragraph (b)(4): Section II. Adjustment Criteria for Section 503
Forfeitures; Forfeiture Policy Statement, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd
17087, 17110 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999) ("Forfeiture
Policy Statement").
47 C.F.R. S: 1.80(b).
See Discussion Radio, 19 FCC Rcd at 7438. See also Side By Side, 23 FCC
Rcd at 898; La Carpa, 22 FCC Rcd at 2745; Lazer, 21 FCC Rcd at 8712;
Shared Data Networks, 20 FCC Rcd at 18186.
See, e.g., Lockheed Martin Corporation, Notice of Apparent Liability for
Forfeiture, 24 FCC Rcd 2980, 2982 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div. 2009);
Discovery World Television, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for
Forfeiture, 24 FCC Rcd 2883 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div. 2009)
("Discovery World"); Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania, Memorandum
Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 23 FCC
Rcd 9357, 9359 (Media Bur., Audio Div. 2008); Sunflower Communications,
Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for
Forfeiture, 23 FCC Rcd 7657, 7659 (Media Bur., Audio Div. 2008); Santa
Cruz Educational Broadcasting Foundation, Memorandum Opinion and Order and
Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 22 FCC 21033, 21035 (Media
Bur., Audio Div. 2007) (all proposing the full base forfeiture amount of
$3,000 against broadcast station licensees for failure to file timely
renewal applications).
Section 503(b)(6) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(6), prohibits
assessment of a forfeiture for a violation that occurred more than one
year before the issuance of a NAL, but this section does not bar
consideration of prior conduct in determining the appropriate forfeiture
amount for violations that occurred within the one-year statutory period.
See Globcom, Inc. d/b/a Globcom Global Communications, Notice of Apparent
Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 19893, 19903 (2003),
forfeiture ordered, 21 FCC Rcd 4710 (2006); Roadrunner Transportation,
Inc., Forfeiture Order, 15 FCC Rcd 9669, 9671-72 (2000).
See Discussion Radio, 19 FCC Rcd at 7438 (proposing a $5,000 forfeiture
against a broadcaster for operating its broadcast station beyond the
expiration of its license); Side by Side, 23 FCC Rcd at 900 (proposing a
$5,000 forfeiture against an earth station operator for operating beyond
the expiration of its license); La Carpa, 22 FCC Rcd at 2746 (proposing a
$5,000 forfeiture against an earth station operator for operating beyond
the expiration of its license); Lazer, 21 FCC Rcd at 8712 (proposing a
$5,000 forfeiture against an earth station operator for operating beyond
the expiration of its license).
News Corporation, parent company of Fox Television, reported second
quarter 2008 revenues from its United States broadcast television networks
at $18 million. See News Corporation Earnings Release for the Quarter
Ended December 31, 2008, News Release, News Corporation, February 5, 2009.
See Forfeiture Policy Statement, 12 FCC Rcd at 17099-100.
See Discovery World, 24 FCC Rcd at 2883; Walgreen Co., Notice of Apparent
Liability for Forfeiture, 22 FCC Rcd 16,045, 16,048 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum
Enf. Div. 2007) (forfeiture paid).
See Discovery World, 24 FCC Rcd at 2883; Petracom of Texarkana, LLC,
Forfeiture Order, 19 FCC Rcd 8096, 8097-8098 (Enf. Bur., 2004). See also,
Side By Side, 23 FCC Rcd at 901; Lazer, 21 FCC Rcd at 8712; Journal
Broadcast Corp., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 20 FCC Rcd
18211, 18214 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., 2005) (forfeiture paid).
47 U.S.C. S: 503(b).
47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.311 and 1.80.
47 C.F.R. S: 1.80.
Federal Communications Commission DA 09-1247
2
Federal Communications Commission DA 09-1247