Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
)
)
In the Matter of File No. EB-06-TC-4501
)
Manning Municipal Communications and NAL/Acct. No. 20073217
Television System Utilities ) 0053
Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ) FRN: 0003752508
)
)
ORDER
Adopted: May 2, 2008 Released: May 2, 2008
By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau:
I. introduction and background
1. In this Order, we cancel a proposed forfeiture in the amount of four
thousand dollars ($4,000) issued to Manning Municipal Communications
and Television System Utilities ("Manning") for apparent willful and
repeated violation of a Commission order for failure to respond to a
directive of the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") to provide certain
information and documents related to the Bureau's investigations into
carrier protection of customer proprietary network information
("CPNI").
2. On December 5, 2006, the Bureau issued a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to
Manning directing Manning to provide the company's CPNI compliance
certificates for the previous five years, prepared pursuant to section
64.2009(e) of the Commission's rules. On March 30, 2007, the Bureau
issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") in the
amount of $4,000 to Manning for failing to respond to a directive of
the Bureau to provide certain information and documents related to the
Bureau's investigation into carrier protection of CPNI. Manning filed
responses to the NAL on May 11, 2007, and May 16, 2007 ("Response").
II. discussion
3. Manning's response to the NAL includes a notarized letter attesting to
the fact that the company filed a response to the LOI in December
2006. The NAL response also included a copy of Manning's CPNI
Certification dated December 8, 2006, an accompanying statement
outlining Manning's CPNI operating procedures and an annual CPNI
acknowledgement that must be signed by its employees. Pursuant to the
December 5, 2006 LOI sent to Manning, the company was required to
direct the original of its response to Marcy Greene, Deputy Division
Chief, Telecommunications Consumers Division, Enforcement Bureau and
submit its response via hand-delivery and via email with all
attachments to christopher.olsen@fcc.gov and marcy.greene@fcc.gov.
Manning failed to submit its response in accordance with the
requirements of the LOI. Companies such as Manning have a duty to
follow all instructions contained in the LOI to ensure that their
responses are addressed to the appropriate individuals and received.
Despite Manning's failure to carefully adhere to the instructions in
the LOI, we exercise our discretion to cancel the proposed forfeiture
against the company in this case, because it has provided evidence
that it did file a timely response, and does not make frequent filings
with the Commission. We strongly caution Manning to carefully follow
all relevant instructions in Commission directives when dealing with
the Commission in the future.
4. Based on our review of Manning's Response and the record, we find that
Manning did not willfully and repeatedly violate a Commission order by
failing to respond to a directive of the Bureau. Consequently, we
conclude that no forfeiture should be imposed.
5. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 503(b) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and sections 0.111,
0.311 and 1.80(f) (4) of the Commission's rules, that the proposed
forfeiture in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4,000) issued to
Manning Municipal Communications and Television System Utilities, in
the March 30, 2007, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture for
willful and repeated violations of a Commission order IS CANCELLED.
6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be sent by First
Class Mail and Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to Manning
Municipal Communications and Television System Utilities, at its
address of record.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Kris A. Monteith
Chief, Enforcement Bureau
Letter from Marcy Greene, Deputy Division Chief, Telecommunications
Consumers Division, Enforcement Bureau to Jeffrey F. Carson, Manning
Municipal Communications and Television System Utilities and CT
Corporation (December 5, 2006) ("LOI"). See 47 C.F.R. S: 64.2009(e).
Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 22 FCC Rcd 6313 (March 30,
2007).
(...continued from previous page)
(continued....)
Federal Communications Commission DA 08-457
2
Federal Communications Commission DA 08-457