Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
)
)
)
In the Matter of ) File No. EB-07-TC-1432
Coastal Steel Structures, Inc. ) NAL/Acct No. 200832170054
Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ) FRN: 0017853110
)
)
)
NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE
Adopted: June 11, 2008 Released: June 12, 2008
By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau:
I. INTRODUCTION
1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find
that Coastal Steel Structures, Inc. ("Coastal Steel") apparently
willfully or repeatedly violated section 227 of the Communications Act
of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and the Commission's related rules and
orders, by delivering at least four unsolicited advertisements to the
telephone facsimile machines of at least four consumers. Based on the
facts and circumstances surrounding these apparent violations, we find
that Coastal Steel is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount
of $18,000.
II. BACKGROUND
2. Section 227(b)(1)(C) of the Act makes it "unlawful for any person
within the United States, or any person outside the United States if
the recipient is within the United States . . . to use any telephone
facsimile machine, computer, or other device to send, to a telephone
facsimile machine, an unsolicited advertisement." The term
"unsolicited advertisement" is defined in the Act and the Commission's
rules as "any material advertising the commercial availability or
quality of any property, goods, or services which is transmitted to
any person without that person's prior express invitation or
permission in writing or otherwise." Under the Commission's rules, an
"established business relationship" exception permits a party to
deliver a message to a consumer if the sender has an established
business relationship with the recipient and the sender obtained the
number of the facsimile machine through the voluntary communication by
the recipient, directly to the sender, within the context of the
established business relationship, or through a directory,
advertisement, or a site on the Internet to which the recipient
voluntarily agreed to make available its facsimile number for public
distribution.
3. On May 18, 2007, in response to one or more consumer complaints
alleging that Coastal Steel had faxed unsolicited advertisements, the
Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") issued a citation to Coastal Steel,
pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Act. The Bureau cited Coastal
Steel for using a telephone facsimile machine, computer, or other
device, to send unsolicited advertisements to a telephone facsimile
machine, in violation of section 227 of the Act and the Commission's
related rules and orders. The citation, which was served by certified
mail, return receipt requested, warned Coastal Steel that subsequent
violations could result in the imposition of monetary forfeitures of
up to $11,000 per violation, and included a copy of the consumer
complaints that formed the basis of the citation. The citation
informed Coastal Steel that within thirty (30) days of the date of the
citation, it could either request an interview with Commission staff,
or could provide a written statement responding to the citation.
Coastal Steel did not request an interview or otherwise respond to the
citation.
4. Despite the citation's warning that subsequent violations could result
in the imposition of monetary forfeitures, we have received additional
consumer complaints indicating that Coastal Steel continued to engage
in such conduct after issuance of the citation. We base our action
here specifically on four complaints filed by four consumers
establishing that Coastal Steel continued to send four unsolicited
advertisements to telephone facsimile machines after the date of the
citation.
5. Section 503(b) of the Act authorizes the Commission to assess a
forfeiture of up to $11,000 for each violation of the Act or of any
rule, regulation, or order issued by the Commission under the Act by a
non-common carrier or other entity not specifically designated in
section 503 of the Act. In exercising such authority, we are to take
into account "the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the
violation and, with respect to the violator, the degree of
culpability, any history of prior offenses, ability to pay, and such
other matters as justice may require."
III. DISCUSSION
A. Violations of the Commission's Rules Restricting Unsolicited Facsimile
Advertisements
6. We find that Coastal Steel apparently violated section 227 of the Act
and the Commission's related rules and orders by using a telephone
facsimile machine, computer, or other device to send at least four
unsolicited advertisements to the consumers identified in the
Appendix. This NAL is based on evidence that the consumers received
unsolicited fax advertisements from Coastal Steel after the
Commission's citation. The facsimile transmissions advertise metal
buildings. Further, according to the complaints, the consumers neither
had an established business relationship with Coastal Steel nor gave
Coastal Steel permission to send the facsimile transmissions. The
faxes at issue here therefore fall within the definition of an
"unsolicited advertisement." Based on the entire record, including
the consumer complaints, we conclude that Coastal Steel apparently
violated section 227 of the Act and the Commission's related rules and
orders by sending four unsolicited advertisements to the consumers'
facsimile machines.
B. Proposed Forfeiture
7. We find that Coastal Steel is apparently liable for a forfeiture in
the amount of $18,000. Although the Commission's Forfeiture Policy
Statement does not establish a base forfeiture amount for violating
the prohibition against using a telephone facsimile machine to send
unsolicited advertisements, the Commission has previously considered
$4,500 per unsolicited fax advertisement to be an appropriate base
amount. We apply that base amount to the four apparent violations.
Thus, a total forfeiture of $18,000 is proposed. Coastal Steel will
have the opportunity to submit evidence and arguments in response to
this NAL to show that no forfeiture should be imposed or that some
lesser amount should be assessed.
IV. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES
8. We have determined that Coastal Steel Structures, Inc. apparently
violated section 227 of the Act and the Commission's related rules and
orders by using a telephone facsimile machine, computer, or other
device to send at least four unsolicited advertisements to the four
consumers identified in the Appendix. We have further determined that
Coastal Steel Structures, Inc. is apparently liable for a forfeiture
in the amount of $18,000.
9. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 503(b) of the Act, 47
U.S.C. S: 503(b), and section 1.80 of the rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80,
and under the authority delegated by sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the
Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.311, that Coastal Steel
Structures, Inc. is hereby NOTIFIED of this APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A
FORFEITURE in the amount of $18,000 for willful or repeated violations
of section 227(b)(1)(C) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. S:
227(b)(1)(C), sections 64.1200(a)(3) of the Commission's rules, 47
C.F.R. S: 64.1200(a)(3), and the related orders described in the
paragraphs above.
10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, pursuant to section 1.80 of the
Commission's rules, within thirty (30) days of the release date of
this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, Coastal Steel
Structures, Inc. SHALL PAY the full amount of the proposed forfeiture
or SHALL FILE a written statement seeking reduction or cancellation of
the proposed forfeiture.
11. Payment of the forfeiture must be made by check or similar instrument,
payable to the order of the Federal Communications Commission. The payment
must include the NAL/Account Number and FRN Number referenced above.
Payment by check or money order may be mailed to Federal Communications
Commission, P.O. Box 979088, St. Louis, MO 63197-9000. Payment by
overnight mail may be sent to U.S. Bank - Government Lockbox #979088,
SL-MO-C2-GL, 1005 Convention Plaza, St. Louis, MO 63101. Payment by wire
transfer may be made to ABA Number 021030004, receiving bank TREAS/NYC,
and account number 27000001. For payment by credit card, an FCC Form 159
(Remittance Advice) must be submitted. When completing the FCC Form 159,
enter the NAL/Account number in block number 23A (call sign/other ID), and
enter the letters "FORF" in block number 24A (payment type code). Coastal
Steel Structures, Inc. will also send electronic notification on the date
said payment is made to Johnny.drake@fcc.gov. Requests for full payment
under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief Financial Officer --
Financial Operations, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 1-A625, Washington,
D.C. 20554. Please contact the Financial Operations Group Help Desk at
1-877-480-3201 or Email: ARINQUIRIES@fcc.gov with any questions regarding
payment procedures.
12. The response, if any, must be mailed both to the Office of the
Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW,
Washington, DC 20554, ATTN: Enforcement Bureau - Telecommunications
Consumers Division, and to Colleen Heitkamp, Chief, Telecommunications
Consumers Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission,
445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554, and must include the NAL/Acct.
No. referenced in the caption.
13. The Commission will not consider reducing or canceling a forfeiture in
response to a claim of inability to pay unless the petitioner submits: (1)
federal tax returns for the most recent three-year period; (2) financial
statements prepared according to generally accepted accounting practices;
or (3) some other reliable and objective documentation that accurately
reflects the petitioner's current financial status. Any claim of inability
to pay must specifically identify the basis for the claim by reference to
the financial documentation submitted.
14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability
for Forfeiture shall be sent by Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested
and First Class Mail to Coastal Steel Structures, Inc., Attention: Peter
Cogan, President, 505 South Federal Highway, Suite 4, Deerfield Beach, FL
33441, 530 South Federal Highway, Deerfield Beach, FL 33441, and to
Mitchell Perlstein, Registered Agent, 4800 North Federal Highway, Boca
Raton, FL 33431.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Kris Anne Monteith
Chief, Enforcement Bureau
APPENDIX
Complainants and Violation Dates
Complainant received facsimile solicitations Violation Date(s)
Thomas Brown 6/27/07
Jamie Gelhaus 7/24/07
James Maxim 6/19/07
Chay Niks 6/26/07
See 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(1). The Commission has the authority under this
section of the Act to assess a forfeiture against any person who has
"willfully or repeatedly failed to comply with any of the provisions of
this Act or of any rule, regulation, or order issued by the Commission
under this Act ...." See also 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5) (stating that the
Commission has the authority under this section of the Act to assess a
forfeiture penalty against any person who does not hold a license, permit,
certificate or other authorization issued by the Commission or an
applicant for any of those listed instrumentalities so long as such person
(A) is first issued a citation of the violation charged; (B) is given a
reasonable opportunity for a personal interview with an official of the
Commission, at the field office of the Commission nearest to the person's
place of residence; and (C) subsequently engages in conduct of the type
described in the citation).
Coastal Steel has offices at 505 South Federal Highway, Suite 4, Deerfield
Beach, FL 33441 and 530 South Federal Highway, Deerfield Beach, FL 33441.
Peter Cogan is the President of Coastal Steel. Accordingly, all references
in this NAL to "Coastal Steel" also encompass the foregoing individual and
all other principals and officers of this entity, as well as the corporate
entity itself. The registered agent for Coastal Steel is listed as
Mitchell Perlstein, 4800 North Federal Highway, Boca Raton, FL 33431.
See 47 U.S.C. S: 227(b)(1)(C); 47 C.F.R. S: 64.1200(a)(3); see also
Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
of 1991, Report and Order and Third Order on Reconsideration, 21 FCC Rcd
3787 (2006).
47 U.S.C. S: 227(b)(1)(C); 47 C.F.R. S: 64.1200(a)(3).
47 U.S.C. S: 227(a)(4); 47 C.F.R. S: 64.1200(f)(13).
An "established business relationship" is defined as a prior or existing
relationship formed by a voluntary two-way communication "with or without
an exchange of consideration, on the basis of an inquiry, application,
purchase or transaction by the business or residential subscriber
regarding products or services offered by such person or entity, which
relationship has not been previously terminated by either party." 47
C.F.R. S: 64.1200(f)(5).
See 47 U.S.C. S: 227(b)(1)(C); 47 C.F.R. S: 64.1200(a)(3)(i), (ii).
Citation from Kurt A. Schroeder, Deputy Chief, Telecommunications
Consumers Division, Enforcement Bureau, File No.EB-07-TC-1432, issued to
Coastal Steel on May 18, 2007.
See 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5) (authorizing the Commission to issue citations
to persons who do not hold a license, permit, certificate or other
authorization issued by the Commission or an applicant for any of those
listed instrumentalities for violations of the Act or of the Commission's
rules and orders).
Bureau staff mailed the citation to the following addresses: Coastal
Steel, 505 South Federal Highway, Suite 4, Deerfield Beach, FL 33441 and
to Mitchell Perlstein, Registered Agent, 4800 North Federal Highway, Boca
Raton, FL 33431. See n.2, supra.
See Appendix for a listing of the consumer complaints against Coastal
Steel requesting Commission action.
We note that evidence of additional instances of unlawful conduct by
Coastal Steel may form the basis of subsequent enforcement action.
Section 503(b)(2)(C) provides for forfeitures up to $10,000 for each
violation in cases not covered by subparagraph (A) or (B), which address
forfeitures for violations by licensees and common carriers, among others.
See 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b). In accordance with the inflation adjustment
requirements contained in the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996,
Pub. L. 104-134, Sec. 31001, 110 Stat. 1321, the Commission implemented an
increase of the maximum statutory forfeiture under section 503(b)(2)(C) to
$11,000. See 47 C.F.R. S:1.80(b)(3); Amendment of Section 1.80 of the
Commission's Rules and Adjustment of Forfeiture Maxima to Reflect
Inflation, 15 FCC Rcd 18221 (2000); see also Amendment of Section 1.80(b)
of the Commission's Rules and Adjustment of Forfeiture Maxima to Reflect
Inflation, 19 FCC Rcd 10945 (2004) (this recent amendment of section
1.80(b) to reflect inflation left the forfeiture maximum for this type of
violator at $11,000).
47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(2)(D); The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement
and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture
Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087, 17100-01 para. 27 (1997)
(Forfeiture Policy Statement), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999).
See, e.g., complaint dated June 26, 2007, from Chay Niks (stating that he
has never done business with the fax advertiser, never made an inquiry or
application to the fax advertiser and never given permission for the fax
advertiser to fax an advertisement to him). The complainants involved in
this action are listed in the Appendix.
See 47 U.S.C. S: 227(a)(4); 47 C.F.R. S: 64.1200(f)(13) (definition
previously at S: 64.1200(f)(10)).
See Get-Aways, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability For Forfeiture, 15 FCC
Rcd 1805 (1999); Get-Aways, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 15 FCC Rcd 4843
(2000); see also US Notary, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for
Forfeiture, 15 Rcd 16999 (2000); US Notary, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 16 FCC
Rcd 18398 (2001); Tri-Star Marketing, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability
For Forfeiture, 15 FCC Rcd 11295 (2000); Tri-Star Marketing, Inc.,
Forfeiture Order, 15 FCC Rcd 23198 (2000).
See 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(4)(C); 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80(f)(3).
47 C.F.R. S: 1.80.
(...continued from previous page)
(continued....)
Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1387
1
2
Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1387