Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version


This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.


                                   Before the

                       Federal Communications Commission

                             Washington, D.C. 20554

     In the Matter of           )                              
     A Radio Company, Inc.      )                              
                                     File Number EB-05-SJ-025  
     Licensee of Station WEGA   )                              
                                    NAL/Acct. No.200632680001  
     P.O. Box 1488              )                              
                                               FRN 0010555654  
     Vega Baja, PR 00694        )                              
     Facility ID # 69853        )                              

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

   Adopted:  January 30, 2007 Released:  February 1, 2007

   By the Assistant Chief, Enforcement Bureau:


    1. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order ("Order"), we grant in part and
       deny in part the petition for reconsideration filed by A Radio
       Company, Inc. ("A Radio"), licensee of AM radio station WEGA in Vega
       Baja, Puerto Rico, of the Forfeiture Order issued November 3, 2006.
       The Forfeiture Order imposed a monetary forfeiture in the amount of
       $15,000 on A Radio for the willful violation of Sections 73.49 and
       73.3526 of the Rules and the willful and repeated violation of Section
       73.1350(a) of the Rules. The noted violations involved A Radio's
       failure to enclose an antenna tower having radio frequency potential
       at the base within an effective locked fence, its failure to make
       available a complete public inspection file, and its failure to
       operate its station in accordance with the terms of its station


    2. On August 25, 2005, in response to a complaint, resident agents from
       the Commission's San Juan Office of the Enforcement Bureau ("San Juan
       Office") conducted an inspection of station WEGA located in Vega Baja,
       Puerto Rico. Among other violations, the agents observed that the
       easternmost antenna structure, which had radio frequency potential at
       its base, was not enclosed within an effective locked fence. Moreover,
       the agents observed a sizable hole on the right side of the perimeter
       property fence, which would allow access to the property.

    3. On October 25, 2005, a resident agent of the San Juan Office issued a
       Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") in the amount of
       $15,000 to A Radio. A Radio filed a response to the NAL dated January
       11, 2006. The Enforcement Bureau found no basis upon which to reduce
       the proposed forfeiture and issued the Forfeiture Order. On December
       4, 2006, A Radio filed a petition for reconsideration of the
       Forfeiture Order requesting reduction or cancellation of the
       forfeiture associated with its violation of Section 73.49 of the


    4. The forfeiture amount in this case was assessed in accordance with
       Section 503(b) of the Act, Section 1.80 of the Rules, and The
       Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80
       of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines. In examining A
       Radio's petition, Section 503(b) of the Act requires that the
       Commission take into account the nature, circumstances, extent and
       gravity of the violation and, with respect to the violator, the degree
       of culpability, any history of prior offenses, ability to pay, and any
       other such matters as justice may require.

    5. In its petition for reconsideration, A Radio admits that the
       easternmost antenna, which had radio frequency potential at its base,
       was not enclosed by an effective locked fence or a protective
       perimeter property fence. Nevertheless, A Radio asserts the forfeiture
       for this violation should be cancelled or reduced, because the tower
       was surrounded by a swamp more than 12 inches deep filled with
       crocodiles and leaches. A Radio also claims this swamp contains
       overflow from the local sewage treatment plant. A Radio states that
       this swamp makes accessing the tower very difficult and notes that the
       agents did not access the base of the tower. Finally, A Radio asserts
       that the Department of Natural Resources ("DNR") is presenting
       "obstacles" to construction of a fence, due to the swampy conditions.
       Citing Buchanan Broadcasting, Inc., a case in which the Bureau reduced
       a forfeiture because "the muddy conditions around the base of the
       tower arguably impeded access, making the lack of effective fencing a
       less significant safety hazard," A Radio requests that the forfeiture
       be reduced or cancelled, because the swamp significantly impeded
       access to the tower and reduced the safety hazard posed by the lack of
       an individual tower fence.

    6. It is undisputed that on August 25, 2005, A Radio was in violation of
       Section 73.49 of the Rules, because it failed to enclose an antenna
       tower having radio frequency potential at its base within an effective
       locked fence or protective perimeter property fence. We agree,
       however, that the flooding surrounding the antenna tower arguably
       created a semi-permanent barrier, impeding access to the tower,
       thereby reducing the safety hazard posed by the lack of effective
       fencing. We also note that A Radio's engineering consultant states in
       a sworn affidavit that the Department of Natural Resources is
       presenting "obstacles" to constructing a fence on this swampy area.
       Accordingly, based on the totality of the circumstances, we reduce the
       forfeiture associated with this violation to $6,000.


    7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 405 of the
       Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1.106 of the
       Commission's Rules, A Radio, Inc.'s petition for reconsideration of
       the November 3, 2006 Forfeiture Order IS hereby GRANTED IN PART and

    8. IT IS ALSO ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act, and
       Sections 0.111, 0.311 and 1.80(f)(4) of the Rules, A Radio, Inc. IS
       LIABLE FOR A MONETARY FORFEITURE in the amount of fourteen thousand
       dollars ($14,000) for violation of Sections 73.49, 73.1350(a), and
       73.3526 of the Rules.

    9. Payment of the $14,000 forfeiture shall be made in the manner provided
       for in Section 1.80 of the Rules within 30 days of the release of this
       Order. If the forfeiture is not paid within the period specified, the
       case may be referred to the Department of Justice for collection
       pursuant to Section 504(a) of the Act. Payment of the forfeiture must
       be made by check or similar instrument, payable to the order of the
       "Federal Communications Commission." The payment must include the
       NAL/Acct. No. and FRN No. referenced above. Payment by check or money
       order may be mailed to Federal Communications Commission, P.O.
       Box 358340, Pittsburgh, PA 15251-8340.  Payment by overnight mail may
       be sent to Mellon Bank /LB 358340, 500 Ross Street, Room 1540670,
       Pittsburgh, PA 15251.   Payment by wire transfer may be made to ABA
       Number 043000261, receiving bank Mellon Bank, and account
       number 911-6106. Requests for full payment under an installment plan
       should be sent to: Associate Managing Director, Financial Operations,
       445 12th Street, S.W., Room 1A625, Washington, D.C. 20554.

   10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order shall be sent by regular mail
       and by certified mail, return receipt requested, to A Radio, Inc. at
       its address of record; and an additional copy to A Radio's legal
       counsel, Audrey Rasmussen, Hall Estell Attorneys at Law, 1120 20^th
       St. NW, Suite 700, North Building, Washington, DC 20036-3406.


   George R. Dillon

   Assistant Chief, Enforcement Bureau

   A Radio Company, Inc., Forfeiture Order, DA 06-2259 (Enf. Bur. South
   Central Region November 3, 2006) ("Forfeiture Order").

   47 C.F.R. SS 73.49, 73.1350(a), 73.3526.

   Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, NAL/Acct. No. 200632680001
   (Enf. Bur., San Juan Office, released October 25, 2005).

   47 U.S.C. S 503(b).

   47 C.F.R. S 1.80.

   12 FCC Rcd. 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd. 303 (1999).

   47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(2)(D).

   A Radio states that the easternmost antenna is not in use and does not
   currently have radio frequency potential at its base, so it is not
   required to be enclosed within a locked fence. However, at the time of the
   inspection, the tower did have radio frequency at its base and was subject
   to Section 73.49 of the Rules.

   Buchanan Broadcasting, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 4360
   (Enf. Bur. 2000).

   A Radio also cites several cases in which forfeitures were issued when
   agents were able to access easily the base of the tower. The petition
   implies that if the agents did not access the tower base or could not
   easily access the tower base, the forfeiture should be reduced. Agents are
   not required to access towers having radio frequency potential at the
   bases for forfeitures to be issued. Agents must observe, however, that
   access is possible.

   We note that Section 73.49 of the Rules also states that "Ready access
   must be provided to each antenna tower base for meter reading and
   maintenance purposes at all times." If the flooding around the antenna
   tower significantly impeded access to the tower for meter reading and
   maintenance purposes, A Radio would also have been in violation of this
   provision of Section 73.49. However, this violation was not cited in the

   The swamp, however, is not an absolute barrier to accessing the tower.
   According to a report written by the station's consulting engineer and
   dated May 21, 2005, the station's ground radial system was nonexistent at
   the time. The report stated "Hearsay has it that they were stolen."

   47 U.S.C. S 405.

   47 C.F.R. S 1.106.

   47 C.F.R. SS 0.111, 0.311, 1.80(f)(4), 73.49, 73.1350(a), 73.3526.

   47 U.S.C. S 504(a).

   See 47 C.F.R. S 1.1914.

   Federal Communications Commission DA 07-375



   Federal Communications Commission DA 07-375