Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
)
In the Matter of File No. EB-06-SE-350
)
Jennie Stuart Medical Center NAL/Acct. No. 200732100026
)
Hopkinsville, Kentucky FRN # 0001792423
)
NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE
Adopted: April 10, 2007 Released: April 12, 2007
By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau:
I. introduction
1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, we find Jennie
Stuart Medical Center ("JSMC"), former licensee of Private Land Mobile
Radio Station ("PLMRS") Station WPOY291, Hopkinsville, Kentucky
apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of five thousand, two
hundred dollars ($5,200) for operating its PLMRS station without
Commission authority and for failing to file a timely renewal
application for the station. JSMC acted in apparent willful and
repeated violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934,
as amended ("Act"), and Sections 1.903(a) and 1.949(a) of the
Commission's Rules ("Rules").
II. background
2. JSMC's license for its PLMRS station, WPOY291, expired on August 31,
2004. On August 30, 2006, JSMC filed a request for Special Temporary
Authority ("STA") to continue operating. The Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau granted JSMC STA to continue operating under
call sign WQFP653 on September 1, 2006.
3. Because it appeared that JSMC may have operated its PLMRS station
after the expiration of its license, the Wireless Telecommunications
Bureau referred this case to the Enforcement Bureau for investigation
and possible enforcement action. On December 27, 2006, the Enforcement
Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") issued a letter of
inquiry ("LOI") to JSMC.
4. In its February 1, 2007 response to the LOI, JSMC states that on
"August 28-29, 2006" it first became aware that its license had
expired. JSMC states that "somehow a mistake was made, clerically, and
the expiration date was missed." JSMC acknowledges that it operated
PLMRS station WPOY291 without authority from August 31, 2004 to
September 1, 2006 when the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau granted
STA. JSMC also states that, once it realized that its license had
expired, it submitted "a Special Temporary Authorization [request]...
on August 31, 2006." JSMC further states that it "is a non-profit
corporation" and "the only hospital in Christian County, Kentucky
providing to the community emergency room, intensive care unit,
in-patient surgery, and other medical services attendant to a full
service hospital." JSMC used the license to "connect to ambulances,
and Emergency Operations Center (EOC or 911 calls)". The Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau granted JSMC's STA request on September 1,
2006 and its application for a new license under call sign WQGN764 on
February 12, 2007.
III. DISCUSSION
5. Section 301 of the Act and Section 1.903(a) of the Rules prohibit the
use or operation of any apparatus for the transmission of energy or
communications or signals by a wireless radio station except under,
and in accordance with, a Commission granted authorization.
Additionally, Section 1.949(a) of the Rules requires that licensees
file renewal applications for wireless radio stations "no later than
the expiration date of the authorization for which renewal is sought
and no sooner than 90 days prior to expiration". Absent a timely filed
renewal application, a wireless radio station license automatically
terminates.
6. As a Commission licensee, JSMC was required to maintain its
authorization in order to operate its PLMRS station. JSMC concedes
that it operated the PLMRS station without Commission authority from
August 31, 2004 to September 1, 2006. By operating its PLMRS station
for approximately two years without authorization, JSMC apparently
violated Section 301 of the Act and Section 1.903(a) of the Rules.
JSMC also acted in apparent violation of Section 1.949(a) of the Rules
by failing to file a timely renewal application for the station.
7. Section 503(b) of the Act, and Section 1.80(a) of the Rules, provide
that any person who willfully or repeatedly fails to comply with the
provisions of the Act or the Rules shall be liable for a forfeiture
penalty. For purposes of Section 503(b) of the Act, the term "willful"
means that the violator knew that it was taking the action in
question, irrespective of any intent to violate the Commission's
Rules, and "repeatedly" means more than once. Based upon the record
before us, it appears that JSMC's violations of Section 301 of the Act
and Sections 1.903(a) and 1.949(a) of the Rules were willful and
repeated.
8. In determining the appropriate forfeiture amount, Section 503(b)(2)(E)
of the Act directs us to consider factors, such as: "the nature,
circumstances, extent and gravity of the violation, and, with respect
to the violator, the degree of culpability, any history of prior
offenses, ability to pay, and such other matters as justice may
require." Having considered the statutory factors, as explained below,
we propose a total forfeiture of $5,200.
9. Section 1.80(b) of the Rules sets a base forfeiture amount of ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) for operation of a station without
Commission authorization and three thousand dollars ($3,000) for
failure to file required forms or information. As the Commission
recently held, a licensee's failure to timely file a renewal
application and its continued operations without authorization
constitute separate violations of the Act and the Rules and warrant
the assessment of separate forfeitures.
10. We propose a forfeiture in the amount of $5,000 for JSMC's
unauthorized operation of its station after August 31, 2004. In
proposing this forfeiture amount, we recognize that the Commission
considers a licensee who operates a station with an expired
authorization in better stead than a pirate broadcaster who lacks
prior authority, and thus downwardly adjust the $10,000 base
forfeiture amount accordingly. Consistent with precedent, we also
propose a forfeiture in the amount of $1,500 for JSMC's failure to
file a renewal application for its station within the time specified
in Section 1.949(a) of the Rules. Thus, we propose an aggregate
forfeiture of $6,500 ($5,000 for unauthorized operation and $1,500 for
failure to file a timely renewal application). The forfeitures relate
to JSMC's apparent violations that occurred within the past year, but
take into account that they were continuous in nature over a period of
two years.
11. JSMC claims that its "only explanation [for the violations] is a
genuine and innocent mistake." JSMC explains that "[a]s a hospital
Jennie Stuart reviews contracts annually for expiration dates. Jennie
Stuart has hundreds of providers, and somehow a mistake was made,
clerically, and the expiration date was missed." JSMC also states that
its "notes" section shows an expiration date of 2014. As a Commission
licensee, JSMC is charged with the responsibility of knowing and
complying with the terms of its authorizations, the Act and the Rules,
including the requirement to timely renew the authorization for its
PLMRS station. In addition, JSMC seeks special consideration because
of its non-profit status and states that "all fines and penalties will
be from Jennie Stuart funds to operate the hospital." JSMC has not
explained why a reduction of the forfeiture based on its non-profit
status by itself would be appropriate. We note, in this regard, that
JSMC provided no financial information demonstrating an inability to
pay the forfeiture. Accordingly, no downward adjustment of the
proposed forfeiture on this basis is warranted. We find, however, that
a downward adjustment of the proposed forfeiture from $6,500 to $5,200
is warranted because JSMC made voluntary disclosures to Commission
staff through its request for STA and undertook corrective measures
after learning of its violations, but prior to any Commission inquiry
or initiation of enforcement action.
III. ORDERING CLAUSES
12. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act
and Sections 0.111, 0.311 and 1.80 of the Rules, Jennie Stuart Medical
Center IS hereby NOTIFIED of its APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE in
the amount of five thousand, two hundred dollars ($5,200) for the
willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of the Act and Sections
1.903(a) and 1.949(a) of the Rules.
13. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.80 of the Rules,
within thirty days of the release date of this Notice of Apparent
Liability for Forfeiture, Jennie Stuart Medical Center SHALL PAY the
full amount of the proposed forfeiture or SHALL FILE a written
statement seeking reduction or cancellation of the proposed
forfeiture.
14. Payment of the forfeiture must be made by check or similar instrument,
payable to the order of the Federal Communications Commission. The
payment must include the NAL/Acct. No. and FRN No. referenced above.
Payment by check or money order may be mailed to Federal
Communications Commission, P.O. Box 358340, Pittsburgh, PA
15251-8340. Payment by overnight mail may be sent to Mellon
Bank /LB 358340, 500 Ross Street, Room 1540670, Pittsburgh, PA
15251. Payment by wire transfer may be made to ABA Number 043000261,
receiving bank Mellon Bank, and account number 911-6106. A request for
full payment of the NAL under an installment plan should be sent to:
Associate Managing Director-Financial Operations, 445 12^th Street,
S.W., Room 1-A625, Washington, D.C. 20554.
15. The response, if any, must be mailed to the Office of the Secretary,
Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington,
D.C. 20554, ATTN: Enforcement Bureau - Spectrum Enforcement Division,
and must include the NAL/Acct. No. referenced in the caption.
16. The Commission will not consider reducing or canceling the forfeiture
in response to a claim of inability to pay unless the petitioner
submits: (1) federal tax returns for the most recent three-year
period; (2) financial statements prepared according to generally
accepted accounting practices; or (3) some other reliable and
objective documentation that accurately reflects the petitioner's
current financial status. Any claim of inability to pay must
specifically identify the basis for the claim by reference to the
financial documentation submitted.
17. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent
Liability for Forfeiture shall be sent by first class mail and
Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to Daniel T. Burns, Esq.,
Counsel for Jennie Stuart Medical Center, White, White & Crenshaw, 707
South Main Street, PO Box 2, Hopkinsville, Kentucky 42241 and Jennie
Stuart Medical Center at PO Box 2400, Hopkinsville, KY, 42241-2400.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Kathryn Berthot
Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division
Enforcement Bureau
47 U.S.C. S 301.
47 C.F.R. S 1.903 and 1.949(a).
See STA File No. 0002731759 (granted September 1, 2006). The Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau granted the STA without prejudice to any future
FCC enforcement action against the medical center in connection with
unauthorized operation of its radio facility.
Letter from Kathryn Berthot, Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division,
Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, to James King, JSMC
(December 27, 2006).
Letter from Eric Lee, Vice President Development and Operations to Peter
Waltonen, Esq., Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission (January 29, 2007) ("LOI Response").
Id. at 2.
Id. at 3.
Id. at 4.
Id. at 2.
Id. at 1.
Id.
See File No. 0002910501.
47 C.F.R. S 1.949(a).
47 C.F.R. S 1.955(a)(1).
LOI Response at 4.
47 U.S.C. S 503(b).
47 C.F.R. S 1.80(a).
See Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6
FCC Rcd 4387 (1991), recon. denied, 7 FCC Rcd 3454 (1992); see also Domtar
Industries, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 21 FCC Rcd
13811, 13815 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., 2006); National Weather
Networks, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 21 FCC Rcd
3922, 3925 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., 2006) ("NWN"); (willful is any
conscious or deliberate act and does not require intention to violate the
Act or Rules and repeated means more than once).
47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(2)(E). See also Forfeiture Policy Statement, Report and
Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087, 17110 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303
(1999).
47 C.F.R. 1.80(b).
See Discussion Radio, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of
Apparent Liability, 19 FCC Rcd 7433, 7438 (2004) (proposing forfeitures of
$5,000 and $1,500 against a broadcaster who operated its station for 14
months without Commission authority and failed to timely file its renewal
application) ("Discussion Radio").
See Discussion Radio, 19 FCC Rcd at 7438 (proposing a $5,000 forfeiture
for operating a station for 14 months beyond the expiration of its
license); see also Lazer Broadcasting Corporation, Notice of Apparent
Liability for Forfeiture, 21 FCC Rcd 8710, 8711 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf.
Div., 2006) ("Lazer Broadcasting"); Criswell College , Notice of Apparent
Liability for Forfeiture, 21 FCC Rcd 5106, 5109 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf.
Div., 2006) ("Criswell"); N WN, 21 FCC Rcd at 3925; Journal Broadcast
Corporation, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 20 FCC Rcd
18211, 18213 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., 2005) ("Journal Broadcast");
Shared Data Networks, LLC, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 20
FCC Rcd 18184, 18187 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., 2005) ("SDN").
See Discussion Radio, 19 FCC Rcd at 7438 (proposing a $1,500 forfeiture
for failure to file a timely renewal application for a broadcast station);
see also Lazer Broadcasting, 21 FCC Rcd at 8712; Criswell, 21 FCC Rcd at
5109; NWN, 21 FCC Rcd at 3925; Journal Broadcast, 20 FCC Rcd at 18213;
SDN, 20 FCC Rcd at 18187.
Section 503(b)(6) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(6), prohibits the
assessment of a forfeiture for violations that occurred more than a year
prior to the NAL, but does not bar us from taking into account the
continuous nature of violations in determining the appropriate enforcement
action and/or forfeiture amount. See, e.g., Globcom, Inc. d/b/a Globcom
Global Communications, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and
Order, 18 FCC Rcd 19893, 19903 (2003), forfeiture ordered, 21 FCC Rcd 4710
(2006); Compass, Inc. D/B/A Compass Global, Notice of Apparent Liability
for Forfeiture, 21 FCC Rcd 15132, 15138 (2006); Roadrunner
Transportation, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 15 FCC Rcd 9669, 9671-72 (2000);
Cate Communications Corp., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 60 RR 2d 1386,
1388 (1986); Eastern Broadcasting Corp., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10
FCC 2d 37, 37-38 (1967), recon. denied, 11 FCC 2d 193, 195 (1967); NWN, 21
FCC Rcd at 3925.
LOI Response at 5.
Id. at 4.
Id.
See Discussion Radio, 19 FCC Rcd at 7437; see also Hare Planting Co.,
Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 21 FCC Rcd 13517, 13519
(Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., 2006) ("Hare"); Twin Cities Public
Television, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 21 FCC Rcd
13428, 13430 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div., 2006) ("Twin Cities"); Lazer
Broadcasting, 21 FCC Rcd at 8711; Gilmore Broadcasting Corp., Notice of
Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 21 FCC Rcd 6284, 6286-6287 (Enf. Bur.,
Spectrum Div., 2006) ("Gilmore"); Criswell, 21 FCC Rcd at 5109; NWN, 21
FCC Rcd at 3926; Journal Broadcast, 20 FCC Rcd at 18214; SDN, 20 FCC Rcd
at 18187.
LOI Response at 5.
See Valley Public Television, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order and
Forfeiture Order, 12 FCC Rcd 22795, 22796 (1998) (rejecting a non-profit
public television licensee's claim that payment of a forfeiture would
threaten its continued provision of service to the public where the
financial data submitted by the licensee showed that it had the ability to
pay the forfeiture); see also Donald Donovan Jackson, Forfeiture Order,
19 FCC Rcd 15327, 15329 (Enf. Bur. 2004); Concilio Mision Cristiana Fuente
De Agua Viva, Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 19132, 19134 (Enf. Bur. 2002),
recon. denied, 18 FCC Rcd 6210 (Enf. Bur. 2003).
See infra paragraph 16.
See Petracom of Texarkana, LLC, Forfeiture Order, 19 FCC Rcd 8096,
8097-8098 (Enf. Bur. 2004); see also Hare, 21 FCC Rcd at 13520; Twin
Cities, 21 FCC Rcd at 13431; Lazer Broadcasting, 21 FCC Rcd at 8711;
Gilmore, 21 FCC Rcd at 6286-87; Criswell, 21 FCC Rcd at 5109; NWN, 21 FCC
Rcd at 3926; Journal Broadcast, 20 FCC Rcd at 18214; SDN, 20 FCC Rcd at
18187.
47 U.S.C. S 503(b).
47 C.F.R. SS 0.111, 0.311 and 1.80.
47 C.F.R. S 1.80.
See 47 C.F.R. S 1.1914.
Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1687
5
Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1686
NON-PUBLIC INFORMATION - FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY