Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version

******************************************************** 
                      NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.

*****************************************************************



                                   Before the

                       Federal Communications Commission

                             Washington, D.C. 20554


                                          )                               
                                                                          
     In the Matter of                     )                               
                                                   File No. EB-06-LA-132  
     Una Vez Mas Las Vegas License, LLC   )                               
                                              NAL/Acct. No. 200632900012  
     Licensee of KHDF-CA, Las Vegas, NV   )                               
                                                         FRN: 0014855969  
     Facility ID No. 66807                )                               
                                                                          
                                          )                               


                                FORFEITURE ORDER

   Adopted: March  28, 2007 Released:  March 30, 2007

   By the Regional Director, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau:

   I.  INTRODUCTION

    1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in
       the amount of six thousand, four hundred dollars ($6,400) to Una Vez
       Mas Las Vegas License, LLC ("Una Vez"), licensee of Class A Television
       Broadcast station KHDF-CA, serving Las Vegas, Nevada, for willfully
       and repeatedly violating Section 73.3526 of the Commission's Rules
       (Rules). On August 9, 2006, the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles
       Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") in
       the amount of $8,000 to Una Vez for failing to maintain a complete
       public inspection file. In this Order, we consider Una Vez's arguments
       that the proposed forfeiture amount exceeds other forfeitures proposed
       to broadcast stations with partially complete public inspection files;
       that Una Vez has a history of compliance with the Commission's Rules;
       and that Una Vez took steps to correct the violation after the
       inspection by a Los Angeles Office agent.

   II. BACKGROUND

    2. On May 16, 2006, an agent of the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles
       Office conducted an inspection of the KHDF-CA's public inspection file
       at the main studio for KHDF-CA at 600 Whitney Ranch, Suite C12,
       Henderson, Nevada. While examining the public inspection file, the
       agent observed that the file was not complete. Specifically, there
       were no TV issues/program lists for any quarter before the third
       quarter of 2005 and there were no records or certifications concerning
       commercial limits during children's programming for the fourth quarter
       of 2004, the first and third quarters of 2005, and the first quarter
       of 2006. Additionally, there was no documentation in the public
       inspection file that demonstrated that KHDF-CA was continuing to meet
       the eligibility requirements for a Class A station.

    3. On June 1, 2006, Una Vez filed with the Commission an application to
       renew the KHDF-CA license. In its renewal application, Una Vez states
       that it acquired KHDF-CA on September 14, 2004. In its original
       renewal application, Una Vez certified that the documentation required
       by Section 73.3526 of the Rules had been placed in the station's
       public inspection file at the appropriate times. In an amended renewal
       application, dated September 8, 2006, Una Vez states that there were
       deficiencies in its public inspection file and that such deficiencies
       were not corrected until May 2006.

    4. On August 9, 2006, the Los Angeles Office issued a NAL in the amount
       of $8,000 to Una Vez, finding that Una Vez apparently willfully and
       repeatedly failed to maintain a complete public inspection file for
       KHDF-CA. Una Vez filed a response ("Response") on September 8, 2006,
       arguing that the proposed forfeiture exceeds other forfeitures
       proposed to broadcast stations with partially complete public
       inspection files; that Una Vez has a history of compliance with the
       Commission's Rules; and that Una Vez took steps to correct the
       violation after the inspection by a Los Angeles Office agent.

   III.  DISCUSSION

    5. The proposed forfeiture amount in this case was assessed in accordance
       with Section 503(b) of the Act, Section 1.80 of the Rules, and The
       Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80
       of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines  ("Forfeiture
       Policy Statement"). In examining Una Vez's response, Section 503(b) of
       the Act requires that the Commission take into account the nature,
       circumstances, extent and gravity of the violation and, with respect
       to the violator, the degree of culpability, any history of prior
       offenses, ability to pay, and other such matters as justice may
       require.

    6. Section 73.3526 of the Rules requires that every licensee of a Class A
       TV station shall maintain a public inspection file containing the
       material, relating to that station, described in paragraphs (e)(1)
       through (e)(11) and paragraphs (e)(13) through (e)(17) of this
       section. Further, as required by Section 73.3526(b) the location of
       the public file shall be maintained at the station's main studio
       location. Section 73.3526(e)(11)(i) of the Rules requires licensees to
       place in their public inspection file a list for each calendar
       quarter, to be filed by the tenth day of the succeeding calendar
       quarter, a list of programs that have provided the station's most
       significant treatment of community issues during the preceding three
       month period. This list is known as the TV issues/programs list. The
       public inspection file for KHDF contained no issues/programs lists for
       any calendar quarter before the third quarter of 2005. Una Vez became
       the licensee of KHDF-CA on September 14, 2004, but failed to place in
       the public inspection file TV issues/programs lists for the third and
       fourth quarter of 2004 and the first and second quarter of 2005.

    7. Section 73.3526(e)(11)(ii) of the Rules requires that a commercial TV
       station maintain records sufficient to permit substantiation of the
       station's certification, in its license renewal application, of
       compliance with the commercial limits on children's programming
       established in Section 73.670 of the Rules. The records for each
       calendar quarter must be filed in the station's public inspection file
       by the tenth day of the succeeding calendar quarter (e.g., January 10
       for the quarter October - December, etc.). These records shall be
       retained until final action has been taken on the station's next
       license renewal application. Una Vez failed to place in the KHDF-CA
       public inspection file certification letters or records concerning
       compliance with the commercial limits for children's programming for
       the fourth quarter of 2004, the first and third quarters of 2005, and
       the first quarter of 2006.

    8. Section 73.3526(e)(17) of the Rules requires that a Class A television
       station maintain documentation sufficient to demonstrate the station
       is continuing to meet the eligibility requirements set forth in
       Section 73.6001 of the Rules. Specifically, Section 73.6001(b)
       requires Class A TV stations to "[b]roadcast a minimum of 18 hours per
       day; and . . .[b]roadcast an average of at least three hours per week
       of locally produced programming each quarter." The public inspection
       file for KHDF-CA contained no documentation relating to the station's
       compliance with these requirements.

    9. Una Vez does not dispute that the documents listed above were missing
       from the KHDF-CA public inspection file at the time of the inspection.
       However, Una Vez does argue that the proposed forfeiture amount
       exceeds the amount imposed in other orders where a Commission licensee
       maintained an incomplete public inspection file. Una Vez points to
       Snow Hill Broadcasting, where the Enforcement Bureau's Northeast
       Region reduced a proposed forfeiture from $10,000 to $4,000 where a
       licensee failed to include four quarters of issues/programs lists in
       the file, along with a copy of "The Public and Broadcasting," a
       political file and a file containing emails and letters from the
       public. Una Vez also cites to Twenty-One Sound Communications,  Inc.,
       in which the Enforcement Bureau's South Central Region reduced a
       proposed public inspection file forfeiture from $10,000 to $3,000
       where the public inspection file was missing four quarters of
       issues/programs lists along with a copy of the station's most recent
       renewal and ownership report.

   10. The Snow Hill and Twenty-One Sound Communications cases, however, are
       not dispositive in this case. Both cases involve radio broadcast
       licensees which have no specific public file obligations concerning
       commercial limits for children's programming. The Commission's Media
       Bureau has proposed numerous forfeitures, ranging from $4,000 to more
       than $10,000, where television broadcast licensees failed to include,
       for multiple quarters, both the issues/programs lists and
       certifications and records concerning the station's compliance with
       the commercial limits for children's programming. We note that the
       violations in each of the Media Bureau's cases were self-reported by
       the licensees. Una Vez was apparently unaware of the deficiencies in
       the KHDF-CA public inspection file until the inspection by the Los
       Angeles agent.

   11. Moreover, along with the missing issues/programs lists and missing
       certifications and records of commercial limits for children's
       programming, Una Vez maintained no documentation in the KHDF-CA public
       inspection file that demonstrated that KHDF-CA was continuing to meet
       the eligibility requirements for a Class A station. Because a Class A
       station only maintains its primary status as a television broadcaster
       "as long as the station continues to meet the minimum operating
       requirements for Class A status," the availability of this information
       in the public inspection file is critical for the public to review.
       Given these three categories of missing material for multiple
       quarters, and the fact that the Los Angeles Office also took into
       account that the KHDF-CA public inspection file was partially
       complete, and reduced the base forfeiture proposed to Una Vez from
       $10,000 to $8,000, we affirm the Los Angeles Office's determination.

   12. Una Vez also argues that it has an overall history of compliance with
       the Commission's Rules. We have reviewed our records and we concur.
       Consequently, we reduce Una Vez's forfeiture amount from $8,000 to
       $6,400. However, we disagree with Una Vez's suggestion that as a
       first-time violator, a warning may be an effective compliance tool. We
       are required to "determine whether to issue a warning or assess a
       forfeiture based on the nature and circumstances of the violation." As
       the cases discussed above reveal, a licensee that maintains a
       deficient public inspection file is not entitled to a warning in the
       first instance. This is particularly true here, given the categories
       of material missing from the KHDF-CA public inspection file.

   13. Una Vez also argues that after the May inspection it took steps to
       rectify the public inspection file deficiencies. The Commission has
       consistently held that a licensee is expected to correct errors when
       they are brought to the licensee's attention and that such correction
       is not grounds for a downward adjustment in the forfeiture.
       Additionally, where lapses occur in maintaining the public inspection
       file, neither the negligent acts nor omissions of station employees or
       agents, nor the subsequent remedial actions undertaken by the
       licensee, excuse or nullify a licensee's rule violation.

   14. Based on the information before us, having examined it according to
       the statutory factors above, and in conjunction with the Forfeiture
       Policy Statement, we find that reduction of the proposed forfeiture to
       $6,400 is warranted.

   IV. ORDERING CLAUSES

   15.  ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the
       Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 0.111,
       0.311 and 1.80(f)(4) of the Commission's Rules, Una Vez Mas Las Vegas
       License, LLC, IS LIABLE FOR A MONETARY FORFEITURE in the amount of
       $6,400 for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3526 of the
       Rules.

   16. Payment of the forfeiture shall be made in the manner provided for in
       Section 1.80 of the Rules within 30 days of the release of this Order.
       If the forfeiture is not paid within the period specified, the case
       may be referred to the Department of Justice for collection pursuant
       to Section 504(a) of the Act. Payment of the forfeiture must be made
       by check or similar instrument, payable to the order of the Federal
       Communications Commission.  The payment must include the NAL/Acct. No.
       and FRN No. referenced above.  Payment by check or money order may be
       mailed to Federal Communications Commission, P.O.
       Box 358340, Pittsburgh, PA 15251-8340.  Payment by overnight mail may
       be sent to Mellon Bank /LB 358340, 500 Ross Street, Room 1540670,
       Pittsburgh, PA 15251.   Payment by wire transfer may be made to ABA
       Number 043000261, receiving bank Mellon Bank, and account number 911-
       6106. Requests for full payment under an installment plan should be
       sent to: Associate Managing Director - Financial Operations, Room
       1A625, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554.

   17. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be sent by First
       Class Mail and Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to Una Vez Mas
       Las Vegas License, LLC, at its address of record.

   FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

   Rebecca L. Dorch

   Regional Director, Western Region

   Enforcement Bureau

   47 C.F.R. S 73.3526.

   Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, NAL/Acct. No. 200632900012
   (Enf. Bur., Western Region, Los Angeles Office, released August 9, 2006).

   47 C.F.R. S 73.3526(e)(11)(i).

   47 C.F.R. S 73.3526(e)(11)(ii).

   47 C.F.R. S 73.3526(e)(17).

   See File No. BRTTA-20060601ACQ, filed June 1, 2006 ("Original 2006 Renewal
   Application").

   See File No. BALTTA-20040317ADY, granted April 30, 2004. According to
   Commission records, the transaction was consummated on September 14, 2004.

   Original 2006 Renewal Application at Part IV, Question 3.

   See File No. BRTTA-20060601ACQ, amended September 8, 2006, Exhibit 17.

   47 U.S.C. S 503(b).

   47 C.F.R. S 1.80.

   12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999).

   47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(2)(E).

   47 C.F.R. S 73.3526.

   47 C.F.R. S 73.3526(b).

   47 C.F.R. S 73.3526(e)(11)(i).

   47 C.F.R. S 73.3526(e)(11)(ii). In the Children's Television Act of 1990,
   Pub. L. No. 101-437, 104 Stat. 996-1000, codified at 47 U.S.C. Sections
   303a, 303b and 394, Congress directed the Commission to adopt rules
   limiting the amount of commercial matter that television stations may air
   during children's programming, and to consider in its review of television
   license renewals the extent to which the licensee has complied with such
   commercial limits. Accordingly, the Commission adopted Section 73.670 of
   the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 73.670, which limits the amount of commercial
   matter which may be aired during children's programming to 10.5 minutes
   per hour on weekends and 12 minutes per hour on weekdays. Children's
   Television Programming, 6 FCC Rcd 2111, 2118, recon. granted in part, 6
   FCC Rcd 5093, 5098 (1991). The commercial limitations became effective on
   January 1, 1992. Children's Television Programming, 6 FCC Rcd 5529, 5530
   (1991). See Libco, Inc., 20 FCC Rcd 16541 (MB 2005).

   47 C.F.R. S 73.3526(e)(11)(ii).

   47 C.F.R. S 73.3526(e)(17).

   47 C.F.R. S 73.6001(b).

   20 FCC Rcd 14415 (EB 2005).

   20 FCC Rcd 12497 (EB 2005), recon. denied, 20 FCC Rcd 18064 (EB 2005),
   application for review pending.

   See, e.g., Meredith Corporation, 20 FCC Rcd 19244 (MB 2005); LeSea
   Broadcasting of Tulsa, Inc., DA 07-603, 2007 WL 37852 (rel. February 9,
   2007); UPN Television Stations, Inc. (WUPL(TV)), 20 FCC Rcd 15807 (MB
   2005); Telefutura Orlando, Inc. (WOTF-TV), 20 FCC Rcd 20051 (MB 2005).

   47 C.F.R. S 73.3526(e)(17).

   47 C.F.R. S 73.6001(c).

   Forfeiture Policy Statement, 12 FCC Rcd at 17102.

   AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. 17 FCC Rcd 21866, 21871-76 (2002).

   See Padre Serra Communications, Inc., 14 FCC Rcd 9709 (1999) (citing
   Gaffney Broadcasting, Inc., 23 FCC 2d 912, 913 (1970) and Eleven Ten
   Broadcasting Corp., 33 FCC 706 (1962)).

   47 U.S.C. S 503(b), 47 C.F.R. SS 0.111, 0.311, 1.80(f)(4), 73.3526.

   47 U.S.C. S 504(a).

   See 47 C.F.R. S 1.1914.

   Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1477

   1

   5

   Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1477