Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version


This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.


                             SEPARATE STATEMENT OF



   Re: NEC-Business Network Solutions, Inc., Notice of Debarment and Order
   Denying Waiver Petition, File No. EB-03-IH-0738, FCC 06-91 (June 21,

   Since its inception, the universal service support mechanism for schools
   and libraries (commonly referred to as the E-rate program) has opened up a
   new world of learning and opportunity for millions of school children and
   library patrons. To ensure the continued success of the E-Rate program, we
   must remain committed to monitoring, auditing, reviewing and reinforcing
   the program. A critical part of our Commission oversight is the use of
   debarment, which prohibits bad actors from participating in the program.
   Accordingly, I support our decision in this Order to debar NEC from all
   involvement in the E-Rate program, our first such action against a
   corporate defendant.

   I concur in, rather than approve, this Order because I would have
   supported a longer debarment period. The Commission's rules provide for a
   debarment period of three years, which may be extended to protect the
   public interest or reduced upon a finding of extraordinary circumstances.
   I note that the Department of Justice has encouraged the Commission to
   exercise our debarment policy in a way that encourages early and complete
   cooperation from defendants, and I recognize that the Commission may take
   into account payment of fines and restitution, the length of time that a
   provider has not participated, and most importantly a high degree of
   cooperation with law enforcement. Even weighing these factors, the
   six-month debarment period adopted in this Order falls short, given the
   scope and seriousness of the fraud-related activities in this case. Strong
   enforcement encourages compliance, and penalties should be substantial
   enough to constitute more than just a cost of doing business. In this
   case, a longer debarment period would have sent a stronger and clearer
   message that fraud will not be tolerated.

   Federal Communications Commission FCC 06-91