******************************************************** 
                      NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.

*****************************************************************



   August 10, 2006

   VIA CERTIFIED MAIL

   RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

   Richard Mazursky

   CEO and President

   Digital Innovations, L.L.C.

   3436 N. Kennicott Avenue, Suite 200

   Arlington Heights, IL 60004

   Re:  File No. EB-06-SE-259

   Dear Mr. Mazursky:

   This is an official CITATION, issued to Digital Innovations, L.L.C.
   ("Digital Innovations") pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the
   Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), 47 U.S.C. S
   503(b)(5), for marketing two non-compliant radio frequency devices in the
   United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47
   U.S.C. S 302(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"),
   47 C.F.R. S 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the
   Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary
   forfeitures.

   Following receipt of a complaint alleging that Digital Innovations is
   marketing in the United States two radio frequency devices, specifically,
   the Security Dr. PC Defender Screen Lock and the Security Dr. Wireless
   Separation Alarm, that do not comply with the periodic operation limits
   set forth in Section 15.231(e) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.231(e), the
   Enforcement Bureau provided samples of the two devices to the Commission's
   Office of Engineering and Technology ("OET") Laboratory for testing. The
   OET Laboratory tested the devices and determined that they do not comply
   with Section 15.231(e) of the Rules.

   On June 21, 2006, we issued a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to DigitaI
   Innovations. In your response dated July 18, 2006, you acknowledged that
   you have marketed the Security Dr. PC Defender Screen Lock and the
   Security Dr. Wireless Separation Alarm in the United States since May 18,
   2005. You stated that Digital Innovations imported 29,008 and sold 17,045
   PC Defender Screen Locks and imported 23,520 and sold 8,169 Wireless
   Separation Alarms. Furthermore, you indicated that the devices were
   certified and manufactured by Keymark Technology Company, Ltd. of Taiwan.
   You further stated that on November 18, 2005, you ceased importing the PC
   Defender Screen Lock device and on October 25, 2005, you ceased importing
   the Wireless Separation Alarm. You indicated that you ceased importation
   of these two devices due to the lack of demand for each device.

   Section 302(b) of the Act provides that "[n]o person shall manufacture,
   import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home electronic equipment
   and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations
   promulgated pursuant to this section." Section 2.803(a)(1) of the
   Commission's implementing regulations provides that:

   no person shall sell or lease, or offer for sale or lease (including
   advertising for sale or lease), or import, ship, or distribute for the
   purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease, any radio
   frequency device unless ... [i]n the case of a device subject to
   certification, such device has been authorized by the Commission in
   accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and
   labeled as required by S 2.925 and other relevant sections in this
   chapter.

   Section 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.201(b), provides that
   intentional radiators, such as the PC Defender Screen Lock and the
   Wireless Separation Alarm, must be certified prior to the initiation of
   marketing in the United States. Additionally, Section 15.231(e) of the
   Rules provides that devices shall be provided with a means for
   automatically limiting operation so that the duration of each transmission
   shall not be greater than one second and the silent period between
   transmissions shall be in no case less than 10 seconds. As noted above,
   the OET Laboratory has tested the PC Defender Screen Lock and the Wireless
   Separation Alarm and has determined that the transmitters do not comply
   with the periodic operation limits of section 15.231(e) of the Rules.

   Accordingly, it appears that Digital Innovations has violated Section
   302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules by marketing in the
   United States radio frequency devices that do not meet the FCC's technical
   requirements. You further stated in your LOI response that you have
   stopped the importation of these devices, but you did not indicate if you
   intended to cease marketing any inventory that may still remain in your
   possession within the U.S. We caution you that the marketing of any
   remaining inventory of these non-compliant radiofrequency devices would
   constitute a further violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section
   2.803(a) of the Rules.

   If, after receipt of this citation, you violate the Communications Act or
   the Commission's rules in any manner described herein, the Commission may
   impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $11,000 for each such violation
   or each day of a continuing violation.

   You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this
   letter either through (1) a personal interview at the Commission's Field
   Office nearest to your place of business, or (2) a written statement. Your
   response should specify the actions that you are taking to ensure that you
   do not violate the Commission's rules governing the marketing of radio
   frequency equipment in the future.

   The nearest Commission field office appears to be the  Chicago Office  in
   Chicago, Illinois.  Please call Peter Waltonen at  202-418-1160 if you
   wish to schedule a personal interview. You should schedule any interview
   to take place within 30 days of the date of this letter. You should send
   any written statement within 30 days of the date of this letter to:

   Peter Waltonen

   Spectrum Enforcement Division

   Enforcement Bureau

   Federal Communications Commission

   445-12^th Street, S.W., Rm. 7-A721

   Washington, D.C. 20554

   Under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. S 552(a)(e)(3), we are informing
   you that the Commission's staff will use all relevant material information
   before it, including information that you disclose in your interview or
   written statement, to determine what, if any, enforcement action is
   required to ensure your compliance with the Communications Act and the
   Commission's rules.

   The knowing and willful making of any false statement, or the concealment
   of any material fact, in reply to this citation is punishable by fine or
   imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. S 1001.

   Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation.

   Sincerely,

   Kathryn Berthot

   Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division

   Enforcement Bureau

   Federal Communications Commission

   Letter from Kathy Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division,
   Enforcement Bureau, to Richard Mazursky, CEO and President of Digital
   Innovations, L.L.C. (June 21, 2006).

   Letter from Richard Mazursky, CEO and President of Digital Innovations,
   L.L.C., to Peter Waltonen, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement
   Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (July 18, 2006).

   Certification is an equipment authorization issued by the Commission or a
   Telecommunication Certification Body, based on representations and test
   data submitted by the applicant. 47 C.F.R. S 2.907. Keymark was issued a
   certification for the PC Defender Screen Lock on December 23, 2003 under
   FCC ID: PG8KW101T. Keymark was issued a certification for the Wireless
   Separation Alarm on June 3, 2002 under FCC ID: PG8101T01.

   See 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(b)(3).

   Federal Communications Commission DA 06-1607

   1

   3

   Federal Communications Commission DA 06-1607

                       FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

                            WASHINGTON, D.C.  20554