Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the matter of )
)
Carson Communications, L.L.C. )
)
Operator of Cable Systems in: )
) File No. EB-04-HS-058
Havensville, Kansas )
Onaga, Kansas )
)
Request for Waivers of Section )
11.11(a) of the Commission's )
Rules
ORDER
Adopted: January 31, 2005 Released: February 2,
2005
By the Director, Office of Homeland Security, Enforcement Bureau
1. In this Order, we grant Carson Communications, L.L.C.
(Carson) temporary waivers of section 11.11(a) of the Federal
Communications Commission's (Commission) rules (Rules) 1 for
the above-captioned cable television systems. Section
11.11(a) of the Rules required cable systems serving fewer
than 5,000 subscribers from a headend to either provide
national level Emergency Alert System (EAS) messages on all
programmed channels or to install EAS equipment and provide a
video interrupt and audio alert on all programmed channels and
EAS audio and video messages on at least one programmed
channel by October 1, 2002.2
2. The Cable Act of 1992 added new section 624(g) to the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended3 (Act), and required
that cable systems be capable of providing EAS alerts to their
subscribers.4 In 1994, the Commission adopted rules requiring
cable systems to participate in EAS.5 In 1997, the Commission
amended the EAS rules to provide financial relief for small
cable systems.6 The Commission declined to exempt small cable
systems from the EAS requirements, concluding that such an
exemption would be inconsistent with the statutory mandate of
Section 624(g).7 However, the Commission extended the
deadline for cable systems serving fewer than 10,000
subscribers to begin complying with the EAS rules to October
1, 2002, and provided cable systems serving fewer than 5,000
subscribers the option of either providing national level EAS
messages on all programmed channels or installing EAS
equipment and providing a video interrupt and audio alert on
all programmed channels and EAS audio and video messages on at
least one programmed channel.8 In addition, the Commission
stated that it would grant waivers of the EAS rules to small
cable systems on a case-by-case basis upon a showing of
financial hardship.9
3. On July 14, 2004, Carson filed a request for temporary
waivers of the EAS requirements for the above captioned cable
television systems which it acquired from Galaxy Cable, Inc. on
June 1, 2004.10 In support of its waiver requests, Carson
reports that these are small, rural cable systems which serve
between 36 and 155 subscribers, respectively. Based on price
quotes provided by EAS equipment vendors, Carson estimates that
it would cost approximately $20,000 to purchase and install EAS
equipment at the subject cable systems. Carson asserts that this
cost will impose a substantial financial hardship on it and
provides financial data for 2004 and through May 2004, in support
of this assertion. Carlson argues that the need for the waivers
is especially acute because the Havensville and Onaga system are
very small and are not yet generating the revenue to fund the
purchase and installation of EAS equipment. Finally, Carson
contends that subscribers will continue to have ready access to
national EAS information from other sources, including its cable
system and over-the-air reception of broadcast television and
radio stations.
4 Based upon our review of the financial data and other
information submitted by Carson, we conclude that temporary
waivers of section 11.11(a) of the rules its cable television
systems in Havensville and Onaga, Kansas, are warranted. In
particular, we find that the estimated $20,000 cost to purchase
and install EAS equipment at these recently acquired cable
television systems could impose a financial hardship on Carson.
3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.111,
0.204(b) and 0.311 of the rules,11 Carson Communications,
Inc.'s request for temporary waivers of section 11.11(a) of
the rules is GRANTED until October 1, 2005, for its cable
television systems in Havensville and Onaga, Kansas.12
4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Carson Communications, Inc. place
a copy of this waiver in its system files.
5. IT IS FURTHER ORDER that a copy of this Order shall be sent
by Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to counsel for
Carson Communications, L.L.C, Christopher C. Cinnamon, Esq.,
Cinnamon Muller, 307 North Michigan Avenue, Suite 1020,
Chicago, Illinois 60601.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
James A. Dailey
Director, Office of Homeland Security
Enforcement Bureau
- Unhandled Picture -
_________________________
1 47 C.F.R. § 11.11(a).
2 Id.
3 The Communications Act of 1934 was amended by the
Telecommunications Act of 1996. Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56
(1996) (1996 Act).
4 Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of
1992, Pub. L. No. 102-385, § 16(b), 106 Stat. 1460, 1490 (1992).
Section 624(g) provides that ``each cable operator shall comply
with such standards as the Commission shall prescribe to ensure
that viewers of video programming on cable systems are afforded
the same emergency information as is afforded by the emergency
broadcasting system pursuant to Commission regulations ....'' 47
U.S.C. § 544(g).
5 Amendment of Part 73, Subpart G, of the Commission's Rules
Regarding the Emergency Broadcast System, Report and Order and
Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, FO Docket Nos. 91-171/91-
301, 10 FCC Rcd 1786 (1994) (First Report and Order),
reconsideration granted in part, denied in part, 10 FCC Rcd 11494
(1995).
6 Amendment of Part 73, Subpart G, of the Commission's Rules
Regarding the Emergency Broadcast System, Second Report and
Order, FO Docket Nos. 91-171/91-301, 12 FCC Rcd 15503 (1997)
(Second Report and Order).
7 Id. at 15512-13.
8 Id. at 15516-15518.
9 Id. at 15513.
10 On June 18, 2002, Galaxy was granted temporary waivers, until
October 1, 2005, for the subject systems. See, Galaxy Telecom.,
L.P., Order, 17 FCC Rcd 11798 (2002); In an Order released July
18, 2003, we clarified that the waivers granted to Galaxy
Telecom, L.P. would apply to its successor, Galaxy Cable, Inc.,
See Galaxy Cable, Inc. Order 17 FCC Rcd 14522 (2003). (Chief,
Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau).
11 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.111, 0.204(b) and 0.311.
12 We clarify that these waivers also encompass the EAS testing
and monitoring requirements.