Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version

******************************************************** 
                      NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.

*****************************************************************



                           Before the
                Federal Communications Commission
                     Washington, D.C. 20554

In the Matter of                )
                                )
Gibson Tech Ed, Inc.            )    File No. EB-04-SE-123
Orem, Utah                      )    NAL/Acct. No. 200532100013
                                )    FRN 0007050479
                                )    
                                   
           NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE 

Adopted:  August  30, 2005              Released:   September  1, 
2005

By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division:

I.  INTRODUCTION

1.        In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture 
  (``NAL''), we find Gibson Tech Ed, Inc. (``Gibson'') 
  apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen 
  thousand dollars ($14,000) for apparent willful and repeated 
  violation of Sections 302(b) of the Communications Act of 
  1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a) of the 
  Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2  The noted apparent 
  violations involve Gibson's marketing of two models of 
  unauthorized FM broadcast transmitters. 

II.  BACKGROUND

2.        On June 30, 2004, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') 
  issued Gibson a Citation3 for marketing unauthorized FM 
  broadcast transmission equipment manufactured by Veronica Ltd. 
  (``Veronica''), in violation Section 302(b) of the Act and 
  Section 2.803 of the Rules, and for failing to respond to a 
  letter of inquiry (``LOI'').4

3.        While investigating Gibson's marketing of Veronica FM 
  transmitters and power amplifiers, Bureau staff observed that 
  Gibson was also marketing FM transmitters identified on 
  Gibson's website as ``Ramsey'' equipment.5  The Bureau 
  subsequently investigated Gibson's marketing of Ramsey FM 
  transmitters and determined through internet research on 
  December 2, 2004, and April 18, 2005, that Gibson was offering 
  for sale, on its Hobbytron.com website, fully assembled FM 
  broadcast transmitters designated as R-FM25B-WT and R-FM100B-
  WT.  Gibson's website indicated that both transmitters operate 
  in the FM broadcast band, 88 - 108 MHz, and that the output 
  power of the R-FM100B-WT is adjustable between 25 mW and one 
  watt.  The output power of the R-FM25B-WT was not indicated on 
  Gibson's website, but information in Ramsey's catalog 
  indicates that it is adjustable between 5 µW and 25mW.  The 
  FCC's equipment authorization database indicates that neither 
  Gibson nor Ramsey has received a grant of equipment 
  certification6 for either the R-FM25B-WT or the R-FM100B-WT.

4.        The Hobbytron.com website indicated that customers 
  purchasing the above transmission equipment are required, as a 
  condition of purchase, to sign a form which ``protects our 
  company from the end user causing trouble with the FCC.''  
  Specifically, the form is captioned ``FM Transmitter  
  Certification Form,'' and states that ``[t]his form is used to 
  verify that your purchase of a FM TRANSMITTER product(s) will 
  be used in accordance with appropriate laws regulating 
  intentional radiators.''  This form requires the purchaser to 
  certify as follows: 

          I hereby certify that the product(s) will be 
     operated in accordance with applicable laws of the land 
     for the intended destination of operation.  If resold, 
     we additionally certify that we will . . . enforce this 
     compliance to the purchaser.  I do understand that the 
     product(s) may exceed the legal limits set by the FCC 
     and may not be authorized to be used in the USA.  If 
     for any reason I am notified that I am interfering with 
     the signal of anyone else, I agree to terminate my 
     transmission to prevent any further interference.

          In any case, Gibson Tech Ed, Inc. or HobbyTron.com 
     will not be responsible for my use of this product and 
     it is my sole responsibility to know and obey the 
     applicable laws. . . . [I] . . . further agree to 
     defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Gibson Tech Ed, 
     Inc. (dba Hobbytron.com) from any claims actions or 
     demands resulting from improper use of this equipment.

5.        On March 4, 2005, as part of an investigation of 
  Ramsey's equipment marketing activities, the Bureau sent 
  Ramsey an LOI.7   In its response,8 Ramsey listed Gibson as 
  one its ``retailers/distributors'' but asserted that ``R-
  FM25B-WT and R-FM100B-WT are not valid Ramsey product numbers 
  or designations.''9  Additionally, Ramsey stated that it 
  manufactures the FM100BWT in the United States and claimed 
  that no equipment certification is needed for the FM100BWT 
  because it requires buyers in the United States to provide 
  signed statements that the device will be exported.



     III.  DISCUSSION

6.        Section 302(b) of the Act provides that ``[n]o person 
  shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship 
  devices or home electronic equipment and systems, or use 
  devices, which fail to comply with regulations promulgated 
  pursuant to this section.''  Section 2.803(a)(2) of the Rules 
  provides that: 

     Except as provided elsewhere in this section, no person 
     shall sell or lease, or offer for sale or lease 
     (including advertising for sale or lease), or import, 
     ship, or distribute for the purpose of selling or 
     leasing or offering for sale or lease, any radio 
     frequency device10 unless ... [i]n the case of a device 
     that is subject to certification, such device has been 
     authorized by the Commission in accordance with the 
     rules in this chapter and is properly identified and 
     labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant 
     sections in this chapter [emphasis added].  

7.        The record establishes that Gibson marketed the FM 
  broadcast transmitters designated as R-FM25B-WT and R-FM100B-
  WT in the United States and that neither Gibson nor Ramsey has 
  received a grant of equipment certification for either the R-
  FM25B-WT or the R-FM100B-WT.  Section 15.201(b) of the Rules11 
  requires certification (with inapplicable exceptions) of 
  intentional radiators.  As intentional radiators, R-FM25B-WT 
  and R-FM100B-WT are, therefore, required to be certified12  
  before being marketed in the United States.

8.        Gibson's use of the ``FM Transmitter Certification 
  Form'' appears to be an attempt to circumvent the prohibition 
  on marketing of unapproved radio frequency devices such as the 
  R-FM25B-WT and R-FM100B-WT by placing responsibility for any 
  problems which may result from their use on the buyer.  
  Although Section 2.807(b) exempts devices "manufactured solely 
  for export" from the prohibition on marketing of unauthorized 
  equipment set forth in Section 2.803(a) of the Rules, this 
  exemption only applies to devices that the manufacturer 
  actually exports13 and, thus, is not applicable here.  
  Furthermore, the specific language in Gibson's ``FM 
  Transmitter Certification Form,'' in particular the sentence 
  ``I do understand that the product(s) may exceed the legal 
  limits set by the FCC and may not be authorized to be used in 
  the USA,'' leaves little doubt that Gibson was fully aware 
  that the R-FM25B-WT and R-FM100B-WT have not been authorized 
  for sale in the United States.  

9.        We find, accordingly, that Gibson apparently marketed 
  two models of uncertified FM broadcast transmitters in the 
  United States, in willful14 and repeated15 violation of 
  Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(2) of the 
  Rules. 

10.       Section 1.80(d) of the Rules provides in pertinent part 
  that:

          No forfeiture penalty shall be imposed upon any person 
     under this section, if such person does not hold a license, 
     permit, certificate, or other authorization issued by the 
     Commission, and if such person is not an applicant for a 
     license, permit, certificate, or other authorization issued 
     by the Commission, unless, prior to the issuance of the 
     appropriate notice, such person: (1) Is sent a citation 
     reciting the violation charged; (2) is given a reasonable 
     opportunity (usually 30 days) to request a personal 
     interview with a Commission official, at the field office 
     which is nearest to such person's place of residence; and 
     (3) subsequently engages in conduct of the type described in 
     the citation.. . .. When the requirements of this paragraph 
     have been satisfied with respect to a particular violation 
     by a particular person, a forfeiture penalty may be imposed 
     upon such person for conduct of the type described in the 
     citation without issuance of an additional citation.

     Gibson apparently does not hold a license, permit, 
certificate, or other authorization issued by the Commission.  
However, a forfeiture penalty apparently can be imposed against 
Gibson because the Bureau issued a citation to Gibson on June 30, 
2004, for the same type of conduct, namely, marketing 
unauthorized equipment in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act 
and Section 2.803 of the Rules.

11.       Section 503(b) of the Act authorizes the Commission to 
  assess a forfeiture for each willful or repeated violation of 
  the Act or of any rule, regulation, or order issued by the 
  Commission under the Act.16  In exercising such authority, we 
  are required to take into account ``the nature, circumstances, 
  extent, and gravity of the violation and, with respect to the 
  violator, the degree of culpability, any history of prior 
  offenses, ability to pay, and such other matters as justice 
  may require.''17

12.       Pursuant to The Commission's Forfeiture Policy 
  Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to 
  Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines (``Forfeiture Policy 
  Statement'')18 and Section 1.80 of the Rules,19 the base 
  forfeiture amount for the marketing of unauthorized equipment 
  is $7,000.  In this case, Gibson marketed two distinct models 
  of unauthorized broadcast transmission equipment.  Gibson's 
  marketing of each of these two unauthorized models is a 
  separate violation.  We find that a proposed forfeiture amount 
  of $7,000 is apparently warranted for each of the two models 
  for a total proposed forfeiture of $14,000.20  Accordingly, 
  applying the Forfeiture Policy Statement and statutory factors 
  to the instant case, we conclude that Gibson is apparently 
  liable for a $14,000 forfeiture.

13.       Finally, Gibson is apparently continuing to advertise 
  the unauthorized Ramsey equipment on its Hobbytron.com 
  website.  Accordingly, we require, pursuant to Section 403 of 
  the Act,21 that Gibson submit a report within 30 days of the 
  date of this NAL describing the steps it has taken to come 
  into compliance with the Act and the Rules.

IV. ORDERING CLAUSES

14.       Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to pursuant 
  to Section 503(b) of the Act  and Section 1.80 of the Rules, 
  Gibson Tech Ed, Inc., IS hereby NOTIFIED of its APPARENT 
  LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE in the amount of fourteen thousand 
  dollars ($14,000) for willfully and repeatedly violating 
  Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules.

15.       IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 403 of 
  the Act, Gibson Tech Ed, Inc. SHALL SUBMIT the report 
  described in paragraph 13 within thirty days of the release 
  date of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture to: 
  Federal Communications Commission, Enforcement Bureau, 
  Spectrum Enforcement Division, 445 12th Street, S.W., 
  Washington, D.C. 20054.

16.        IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Section 1.80 
  of the Rules, within thirty days of the release date of this 
  Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, Gibson Tech Ed, 
  Inc., SHALL PAY the full amount of the proposed forfeiture or 
  SHALL FILE a written statement seeking reduction or 
  cancellation of the proposed forfeiture.

17.       Payment of the forfeiture must be made by check or 
  similar instrument, payable to the order of the Federal 
  Communications Commission.  The payment must include the 
  NAL/Acct. No. and FRN No. referenced above.  Payment by check 
  or money order may be mailed to Federal Communications 
  Commission, P.O. Box 358340, Pittsburgh, PA 15251-8340.  
  Payment by overnight mail may be sent to Mellon 
  Bank /LB 358340, 500 Ross Street, Room 1540670, Pittsburgh, PA 
  15251.   Payment by wire transfer may be made to ABA 
  Number 043000261, receiving bank Mellon Bank, and account 
  number 911-6106.

18.        The response, if any, must be mailed to the Office of 
  the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th 
  Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554, ATTN: Enforcement Bureau 
  - Spectrum Enforcement Division, and must include the 
  NAL/Acct. No. referenced in the caption.

19.        The Commission will not consider reducing or canceling 
  a forfeiture in response to a claim of inability to pay unless 
  the petitioner submits:  (1) federal tax returns for the most 
  recent three-year period; (2) financial statements prepared 
  according to generally accepted accounting; or (3) some other 
  reliable and objective documentation that accurately reflects 
  the petitioner's current financial status.  Any claim of 
  inability to pay must specifically identify the basis for the 
  claim by reference to the financial documentation submitted.

20.        Requests for payment of the full amount of this Notice 
  of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture under an installment plan 
  should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations 
  Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554.22

21.       IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of 
  Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be sent by first class 
  mail and certified mail return receipt requested to Gibson 
  Tech Ed, Inc., 1053 S 1680 W, Orem, UT 84058, and to its 
  attorney, Howard J. Barr, Esq., Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & 
  Rice, 1401 I Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005.  

                         FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
                         


                         Joseph P. Casey
                         Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division

_________________________

1 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b).                 

2 47 C.F.R. § 2.803(a).

3 Citation issued on June 30, 2004, to Gibson Tech Ed, Inc., by 
Joseph P. Casey, Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, 
Enforcement Bureau.

4 Letter  from  Joseph P.  Casey,  Chief ,  Spectrum  Enforcement 
Division, Enforcement Bureau, to Gibson  Tech Ed, Inc.  (May  14, 
2004).

5 ``Ramsey''  refers  to  Ramsey Electronics,  Inc.,  located  in 
Victor, NY.

6 A certification is an equipment authorization issued by the 
Commission, based on representations and test data submitted by 
the applicant.  See 47 C.F.R. § 2.907(a).

7 Letter of March 4, 2005, from Kathryn S. Berthot to Michael  A. 
Leo.

8  Letter  of  March  28,  2005,  from  Michael  A.  Leo  to  the 
Enforcement Bureau, Attention: Thomas Fitz-Gibbon.

9 A comparison of information from Hobbytron.com with information 
from Ramsey's website and catalog indicates that the ``R-FM25B-
WT'' is apparently a fully assembled version of the Ramsey FM25B 
transmitter kit, while the ``R-FM100B-WT'' appears to be 
identical to the Ramsey FM100BWT fully assembled transmitter 
manufactured by Ramsey.

10 47 C.F.R. § 2.801 defines a radiofrequency device as ``any 
device which in it its operation is capable of emitting 
radiofrequency energy by radiation, conduction, or other means.''

11 47 C.F.R. § 15.201(b).

12 Ramsey acknowledges in the ``FM100B and FM35 Series FM 
Transmitter Certification'' form provided with its marketing 
materials that the FM100BWT is an intentional radiator.

13 See New Image  Electronics, 17 FCC Rcd  3594, 3596 (Enf.  Bur. 
2002).

14 Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 312(f)(1), which 
applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under 
Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that ``[t]he term `willful,' 
... means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of 
such act, irrespective of any intent to violate any provision of 
this Act or any rule or regulation of the Commission authorized 
by this Act ....''  See Southern California Broadcasting Co., 6 
FCC Rcd 4387 (1991).

15 Section 312(f)(2) of the Act provides that ``[t]he term 
`repeated,' ... means the commission or omission of such act more 
than once or, if such commission or omission is continuous, for 
more than one day.''  47 U.S.C. § 312(f)(2).

16 47 U.S.C. § 503(b).

17 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(2)(D).

18 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999).

19 47 C.F.R. § 1.80.

20 See Samson Technologies, Inc., 19 FCC Rcd 4221, 4225 (2004).

21 47 U.S.C. § 403

22 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1914.