******************************************************** 
                      NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.

*****************************************************************



                           Before the
                Federal Communications Commission
                     Washington, D.C. 20554



In the Matter of                 )
                                )
Gold Point Lodging & Realty,     )
Inc.,                            )
                                )
          Complainant,           )    File No. EB-05-MD-005
                                )
v.                               )
                                )
AT&T Corp.,                      )
                                )
          Defendant.             )
                                )


                              ORDER


 Adopted:  July 29, 2005              Released:  August 1, 2005

By the Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division:


     1.   On April 21, 2005, Gold Point Lodging & Realty, Inc. 
(``Gold Point'') filed with this Commission a formal complaint1 
against AT&T Corp. (``AT&T'') asserting that AT&T violated 
sections 201, 202, and 203 of the Communications Act of 1934, as 
amended,2 by over charging Gold Point for services provided by 
AT&T. 

     2.   On July 27, 2005, Gold Point and AT&T filed a joint 
motion requesting that we dismiss the formal complaint in this 
proceeding, as the parties have settled their dispute.3  We grant 
the parties' request to dismiss the complaint.  We find that 
dismissal at this stage is appropriate and will serve the public 
interest by promoting the private resolution of disputes and 
eliminating the expenditure of further time and resources of the 
parties and the Commission.

     3.   ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 
4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 
U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 208, sections 1.720-1.736 of the 
Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.720-1.736, and the authority 
delegated by sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 
47 C.F.R. §§ 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint 
IS DISMISSED in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED.  

                         FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION







                         Alexander P. Starr
                         Chief, Market Disputes Resolution 
                    Division
                         Enforcement Bureau
_________________________

1 Formal Complaint, File No. EB-05-MD-005 (filed Apr. 21, 2005).
2 47 U.S.C. §§ 201, 202, and 203.
3 Joint Request for Dismissal of the Complaint, File No. EB-05-
MD-005 (filed July 27, 2005).