Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the Matter of ) File No.: EB-
02-CF-712
Mark A. Clay ) NAL/Acct. No.
200332340003
Huntington, West Virginia )
FRN 0005-3791-77
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Adopted: June 21, 2005 Released: June 24, 2005
By the Acting Chief, Enforcement Bureau:
1. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order (``Order''), we
deny the petition for reconsideration filed by Mark A.
Clay (``Mr. Clay'') Huntington, West Virginia. Mr.
Clay seeks reconsideration of the Forfeiture Order1 in
which the Chief, Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau''),
found him liable for a monetary forfeiture in the
amount of $1,000 for willful and repeated violation of
Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended (``Act'').2 The noted violation involves the
operation of an unlicensed FM broadcast station on the
frequency 98.1 MHz, at 5666 Lynn Creek Road,
Huntington, West Virginia.
2. In his petition, Mr. Clay does not dispute our finding
that he committed the violation referenced above. Although the
Forfeiture Order reduced the forfeiture amount from $10, 000 to
$1,000 based upon inability to pay, Mr. Clay seeks
reconsideration and further reduction on the basis of changed
circumstances. Specifically, he claims that his amount of
monthly income has been reduced as a result of divorce.3
3. The forfeiture amount in this case was assessed in
accordance with Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934
as amended (``Act''), 4 Section 1.80 of the Rules,5 and The
Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section
1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines.6 In
examining Mr. Clay's petition, Section 503(b) of the Act requires
that the Commission take into account the nature, circumstances,
extent, and gravity of the violation and, with respect to the
violator, the degree of culpability, any history of prior
offenses, ability to pay, and such other matters as justice may
require.7
4. Although Mr. Clay states that he will provide
documentation in support of his further claim of inability to
pay, he has failed to do so. Accordingly, there is no basis for
granting reconsideration and additional relief.
5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section
405 of the Act8 and Section 1.106 of the Rules,9 Mark A. Clay's
petition for reconsideration of the June 16, 2004 Forfeiture
Order IS DENIED.
6. Payment of the forfeiture shall be made in the manner
provided in Section 1.80 of the Rules within 30 days of the
release of the Order. If the forfeiture is not paid within the
period specified, the case may be referred to the Department of
Justice for collection pursuant to Section 504(a) of the Act.10
Payment of the forfeiture must be made by check or similar
instrument, payable to the order of the Federal Communications
Commission. The payment must include the NAL/Acct. No. and FRN
No. referenced above. Payment by check or money order may be
mailed to Federal Communications Commission, P.O.
Box 358340, Pittsburgh, PA 15251-8340. Payment by overnight mail
may be sent to Mellon Bank /LB 358340, 500 Ross Street, Room
1540670, Pittsburgh, PA 15251. Payment by wire transfer may be
made to ABA Number 043000261, receiving bank Mellon Bank, and
account number 911-6106.
7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT this Order shall be
sent by regular mail and by certified mail, return receipt
requested, to Mark A. Clay, 5666 Lynn Creek Road, Huntington,
West Virginia 25704.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Kris A. Monteith
Acting Chief, Enforcement Bureau
_________________________
1 19 FCC Rcd 10,500 (2004).
2 47 U.S.C. § 301.
3 He also seeks reduction based on the fact that he sold and/or
destroyed the equipment which he had used in his illegal
operation. The fact that he ceased his illegal operation does
not warrant any reduction. As the Commission stated in Seawest
Yacht Brokers, 9 FCC Rcd 6099, 6099(1994), ``corrective action
taken to come into compliance with Commission rules or policy is
expected, and does not nullify or mitigate any prior forfeitures
or violations.''
4 47 U.S.C. § 503(b).
5 47 C.F.R. § 1.80.
6 12 FCC Rcd. 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd. 303
(1999).
7 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(2)(D).
8 47 U.S.C. § 405.
9 47 C.F.R. § 1.106.
10 See 47 U.S.C. § 504(a).