Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
Communications Vending Corporation )
of Arizona, Inc.,
)
)
Complainant,
)
v. ) File No. EB-02-MD-018
)
Citizens Communications Company )
f/k/a Citizens Utilities Company and )
Citizens Telecommunications Company )
d/b/a Citizens Telcom
)
ORDER
Adopted: October 28, 2004 Released: October 29,
2004
By the Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division:
1. On April 26, 2002, Communications Vending Corporation
of Arizona, Inc. (``CVA'') filed with this Commission a
formal complaint against Citizens Communications Company
f/k/a Citizens Utilities Company and Citizens
Telecommunications Company d/b/a Citizens Telcom
(``Citizens''), asserting that the Defendants violated
sections 201(b) and 203(c) of the Communications Act of
1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Part 69 of the
Commission's rules1 by improperly assessing end user
common line (``EUCL'') charges on the Complainant's
payphones.2
2. On October 25, 2004, Complainant filed a motion
requesting that we dismiss the formal complaint in this
proceeding with prejudice, as the parties have settled
their dispute.3 We grant Complainant's motion to dismiss
the formal complaint, with prejudice. We find that
dismissal at this stage is appropriate and will serve the
public interest by promoting the private resolution of
disputes and eliminating the expenditure of further time
and resources of the parties and the Commission.
3. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1,
4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act, as amended,
47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 208, sections 1.720-
1.736 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.720-1.736,
and the authority delegated by sections 0.111 and 0.311 of
the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.111 and 0.311, that
the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE
in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Radhika V. Karmarkar
Deputy Chief
Market Disputes Resolution Division
Enforcement Bureau
_________________________
147 U.S.C. §§ 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996,
Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. §§ 69.1 et. seq.
2 Communications Vending Corporation of Arizona, Inc. v. Citizens
Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Utilities Company and
Citizens Telecommunications Company d/b/a Citizens Telcom,
Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-018 (filed Apr.
26, 2002).
3Communications Vending Corporation of Arizona, Inc. v. Citizens
Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Telcom, Notice of
Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice,
FCC, File No. EB-02-MD-018 (filed Oct. 25, 004).