Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
SEPARATE STATEMENT OF
COMMISSIONER JONATHAN S. ADELSTEIN
Re: Infinity Broadcasting Operations, Inc., Notice of
Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
This Notice sends the unmistakable message to Infinity
and other broadcasters who violate our indecency rules: We
are stepping up our enforcement. Once again, we give fair
warning that the Commission can and will avail itself of a
range of enforcement sanctions, including the initiation of
proceedings that could result in the revocation of these
stations' licenses. I will not hesitate to consider such
revocation proceedings for serious violations that occur
after the explicit notice we provided in April in WKRK-FM,
another case involving Infinity. Similarly, as broadcasters
were explicitly notified in April, I will also support on a
going-forward basis an approach that treats each indecent
utterance, such as distinct conversations or program
segments, as a separate violation under our rules. This
will substantially increase our fines, which by statute are
capped at an inadequate level, so they will be more
commensurate with the offenses.
The Commission reached the obvious conclusion in this
case that the broadcast material was indecent and Infinity
should be liable for the full statutory maximum forfeiture
amount. It took far too long for us to reach this
conclusion, and I hope we will act more swiftly in the
future to send a clear message.
Infinity's actions here were unquestionably willful and
egregious. Program hosts Opie & Anthony held numerous
conversations on the air with station spotters describing
and encouraging sexual activity. Station and program
employees participated actively in the ``Sex for Sam''
contest by planning the event, arranging the spotters,
encouraging the most provocative locations like toy stores
and churches likely to expose innocent children and
worshippers to unwelcome sexual conduct, and instructing the
contestants to go inside St. Patrick's Cathedral. These
callous actions show a high degree of culpability and a
deliberate attempt to heighten the shock to listeners. They
clearly offended community standards.
Unfortunately, the statutory constraints on our ability to
level fines are currently inadequate, as the low fines can
be considered by broadcasters as a cost of doing business
and not a serious deterrent. In this case, a fine below the
statutory maximum would not accurately reflect the
circumstances and Infinity's culpability. I believe
strongly that our fines, or other appropriate enforcement
actions, should be sufficient to deter broadcasters from
broadcasting indecent material on the public's airwaves at a
time when children are listening. Today's action, while an
important step in that direction, must be followed by more
stringent, swifter and stricter enforcement of our statutory
obligation to prevent indecent broadcasts over the public
airwaves.