Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
Nextel Communications, Inc. and )
Nextel Partners, Inc., )
)
Complainants, )
)
v. ) File No. EB-02-MD-036
)
David M. Allen and Allen Wireless Group, )
)
Defendants. )
ORDER
Adopted: January 21, 2003 Released: January 23,
2003
By the Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement
Bureau:
On November 18, 2002, Nextel Communications, Inc. and Nextel
Partners, Inc. (``Nextel'') filed with this Commission a formal
complaint against David M. Allen and Allen Wireless Group
(``Allen'') pursuant to section 208 of the Communications Act of
1934, as amended (the ``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 208. The complaint
alleged, inter alia, that Allen had refused to negotiate in good
faith with Nextel for the relocation of Allen's ``upper 200''
channel 800 MHz facilities, in violation of section 90.699 of the
Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 90.699.
On January 17, 2003, Nextel filed a Motion to Dismiss Complaint
Without Prejudice (``Motion to Dismiss'')1 which stated that the
parties had entered into a settlement pursuant to an Asset
Exchange Agreement under which Allen's ``upper 200'' 800 MHz
licenses will be relocated in accordance with 47 CFR §90.699.
The Motion to Dismiss further stated that counsel for Allen had
reviewed the motion, and had consented to it on Allen's behalf.
We are satisfied that dismissing the complaint will serve the
public interest by promoting the private resolution of disputes
and by eliminating the need for further litigation and the
expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and this
Commission.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and
208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§
154(i), 154(j), and 208, and the authority delegated in sections
0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.111,
0.311, that the Motion To Dismiss the above-captioned complaint
IS GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208
of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§
154(i), 154(j), and 208, and the authority delegated in sections
0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.111,
0.311, that Nextel's formal complaint against Allen IS DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Alexander P. Starr
Chief, Market Disputes Resolution
Division
Enforcement Bureau
_________________________
1 Motion to Dismiss Complaint Without Prejudice, Nextel
Communications, Inc. and Nextel Partners, Inc. v. David M. Allen
and Allen Wireless Group, File No. EB-02-MD-036 (filed Jan. 17,
2003).