Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the Matter of ) RM-10108
)
Dabtcom Technologies, Inc. ) File No. EB-01-TS-
011
)
Petition for Rulemaking to Establish Disaster ) FRN 0005-
7946-15
Alert By Telephone System )
ORDER
Adopted: June 4, 2002 Released: June 10, 2002
By the Commission:
I. INTRODUCTION
1. In this Order, we deny the Petition for Rulemaking
filed by Dabtcom Technologies, Inc. (``Dabtcom'') on January 9,
2001, which proposes to amend the Commission's Rules to
incorporate Dabtcom's Disaster Alert By Telephone (``DABT'')
system into the existing Emergency Alert System (``EAS''), which
conveys emergency messages over broadcast stations and cable
television systems.1
II. BACKGROUND
2. On January 30, 2001, the Enforcement Bureau sent
Dabtcom a letter requesting additional information about its
proposal. Dabtcom responded on April 18, 2001. On May 15, 2001,
the Commission staff issued a public notice2 inviting comments by
interested parties. To date, the Commission has received no
comments, except for late-filed comments from Dabtcom itself on
November 22, 2001, January 29, 2002, and February 5, 2002.
3. The DABT system proposed by Dabtcom would convey
emergency messages via the public switched telephone network to
wireline telephone subscribers located in areas affected by
emergencies. Dabtcom indicates that the DABT system would be
used to provide national level emergency messages from the
President, as well as messages concerning state and local
emergencies, such as tornadoes, hurricanes, floods, hazardous
materials spills and bomb threats. According to Dabtcom, the
DABT system would be ``capable of alerting 40 million businesses
and households within 6 to 14 minutes'' and would be able to
convey emergency messages to wireline telephone subscribers who
are beyond reach of the existing EAS (i.e., those who are not
listening to a broadcast or cable station at the time of an
emergency).
4. Implementation of the DABT system, as described in
Dabtcom's proposal, would require the participation of numerous
entities, including all local telephone companies, public safety
entities, and various federal, state and local agencies.3 For
example, Dabtcom indicates that implementation of its proposed
system would necessitate installation of specialized equipment in
the central offices of all local telephone companies in order to
connect their switching systems to the DABT system. In addition,
Dabtcom proposes that the Commission require all wireline
telephone subscribers in the U.S. to pay a monthly fee directly
to Dabtcom, which would be the sole provider of the service.
III. DISCUSSION
5. We are well aware of the urgent need to enhance our
emergency communications infrastructure in the wake of the
September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Indeed, several groups
are considering potential improvements in emergency notification
systems. We note, for example, that the Communications for
Coordinated Assistance and Response to Emergencies Alliance
(``ComCARE''), a national alliance of over 80 organizations and
companies, has proposed a comprehensive public and private action
plan that would rely on various communications technologies,
including wireline and wireless, to improve emergency
communications and early warning systems during individual and
mass crises. Likewise, the Partnership for Public Warning
(``PPW'') envisions adding to Palm Pilots, cell phones, and a
myriad of other electronic devices a warning network that would
automatically broadcast emergency bulletins. In light of these
broad-based efforts to study and resolve the issue of emergency
communications by relying on the full range of technologies
available today, we conclude that it is not in the public
interest to initiate a rulemaking proceeding on the more narrow
Dabtcom proposal. We expect to initiate a proceeding on the
issue of emergency communications systems in the next year.
6. In view of the foregoing, we find that the institution
of a rulemaking proceeding is not warranted at this time.
IV. ORDERING CLAUSES
7. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.407
the Commission's Rules,4 that Dabtcom's petition for rulemaking
IS DENIED.
8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT this Order shall be sent, by
certified mail, return receipt requested, to Dabtcom
Technologies, Inc., 6285 Karl Road, Columbus Ohio 43229.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Marlene H. Dortch
Secretary
_________________________
1 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 11.1 - 11.62.
2 Public Notice, Consumer Information Bureau , Reference
Information Center, Petition for Rulemaking Filed, Report No.
2483 (rel. May 15, 2001).
3 Dabtcom states that implementation of its proposed system
would require the cooperation and participation of federal
agencies, such as the Department of Commerce, the Federal
Emergency Management Agency, the Department of Defense, the
Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, and
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and state and local agencies.
4 47 C.F.R. § 1.407.