Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the Matter of )
) File No. EB-01-DT-523
Thomas A. Brothers ) NAL/Acct. No.
200232360004
Berkley, Michigan ) FRN: 0006-1077-26
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Adopted: December 20, 2002 Released:
December 24, 2002
By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau:
1. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order (``Order''),
we grant, to the extent noted, Thomas A. Brothers's (``Mr.
Brothers'') petition for reconsideration of a Forfeiture
Order1 we issued imposing a $10,000 forfeiture assessment
against him for willfully and repeatedly violating Section
301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended
(``Act'').2 The noted violations involve Mr. Brothers's
operation of an FM station on 88.3 MHz without a license.
As explained below, we cancel the $10,000 forfeiture based
on Mr. Brothers's demonstrated inability to pay.
2. On January 14, 2002, the District Director of the
Enforcement Bureau's Detroit, Michigan Office issued a
Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Mr.
Brothers for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301
of the Act by operating an FM station without a license.3
On June 6, 2002, we issued a Forfeiture Order affirming the
$10,000 forfeiture proposed by the NAL. We noted in the
Forfeiture Order that Mr. Brothers had not filed a response
to the NAL, and affirmed the Forfeiture Order based on the
information before us. On July 3, 2002, Mr. Brothers filed
what he styled as a ``response'' to the NAL, which we are
treating as a petition for reconsideration of our Forfeiture
Order pursuant to Sections 1.80(i) and 1.106 of the
Commission's Rules (``Rules''). 4
3. In his petition for reconsideration, Mr. Brothers
does not dispute that he willfully and repeatedly violated
Section 301 of the Act. However, he asks that we cancel the
$10,000 forfeiture because of, among other things, his
inability to pay. The financial documentation that he
provides demonstrates his inability to pay and leads us to
conclude that cancellation of the $10,000 forfeiture
assessment is warranted in this case.
5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to
Sections 405, 503(b)(2)(D), and 504(b) of the Act and
Sections 1.80(i) and 1.106 of the Rules,5 Mr. Brothers's
petition for reconsideration IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT NOTED
HEREIN.
6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order
shall be sent by first class mail and certified mail, return
receipt requested, to Thomas A. Brothers, 6808 Norborne
Avenue, Dearborn Heights, Michigan 48127.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
David H. Solomon
Chief, Enforcement Bureau
_________________________
1 Thomas A. Brothers., 17 FCC Rcd 10,550 (Enf. Bur. 2002).
2 47 U.S.C. § 301.
3 Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, NAL/Acct. No.
200232360004 (Enf. Bur., Detroit Office rel. Jan. 14, 2002),
erratum, NAL/Acct. No. 200232360004 (Enf. Bur., Detroit
Office rel. Jan. 28, 2002).
4 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.80(i), 1.106.
5 47 U.S.C. §§ 405, 503(b)(2)(D), 504(b); 47 C.F.R. §§
1.80(i), 1.106.