Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the matter of )
) File No. EB-01-IH-0099
Entercom New Orleans License, )
LLC ) NAL/Acct. No. 2002 3208
) 0006
Licensee of Station WEZB-FM, ) Facility # 20346
New Orleans, Louisiana ) FRN # 0004-9793-81
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Adopted: November 6, 2002 Released: November
7, 2002
By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau:
I. INTRODUCTION
1. In this Order, we cancel a monetary forfeiture in the
amount of $4,000 proposed against Entercom New Orleans License,
LLC (``Entercom''), licensee of Station WEZB-FM, New Orleans,
Louisiana, for apparent willful violation of Section 73.1206 of
the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 73.1206, which requires that
a licensee inform a caller of its intention to broadcast the
caller's conversation except when the caller is aware, or may be
presumed to be aware, that the call is likely to be broadcast.1
2. On February 6, 2002, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau,
acting pursuant to delegated authority, issued a Notice of
Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Entercom,
proposing a $4,000 forfeiture.2 We issued the NAL because it
appeared that Entercom had recorded and subsequently broadcast a
telephone conversation without informing the other party of its
intention to do so, even though it appeared that the
circumstances required it. We therefore determined that Entercom
had apparently violated Section 73.1206 of the Commission's
rules.
II. DISCUSSION
3. Entercom responded to the NAL, and requested
cancellation of the proposed forfeiture. Entercom argued that
complainant's telephone call falls within the ``call-in''
presumption of Section 73.1206 and that the licensee was not
required to inform the complainant that her call was being
recorded and would likely be broadcast. In this case the
complainant originated a telephone call to Entercom's well-
publicized ``call-in'' telephone line during a program that
regularly broadcast telephone calls from listeners. The program
host identified the station when he answered the call. Because
the complainant originated the call, Entercom argues that the
notice requirement of Section 73.1206 of the Commission's rules
was inapplicable to the call. We have considered Entercom's
response in light of the unique facts of this case and the
applicable provisions of the Commission's rules. Under these
circumstances, we find that complainant's telephone call falls
within the ``call-in'' presumption of Section 73.1206, such that
notice is not required in this case.3 We, therefore, conclude
that cancellation of the proposed forfeiture is appropriate.
III. ORDERING CLAUSES
4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to 47 U.S.C.
§ 504(b) and 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(f)(4), the monetary forfeiture
issued against Entercom New Orleans License, LLC IS HEREBY
CANCELLED.
5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Memorandum
Opinion and Order shall be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt
Requested, to Entercom New Orleans License, LLC, c/o John C.
Donlevie, Executive Vice President, Entercom New Orleans License,
LLC, 401 City Avenue, Suite 409, Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania
19004; with a copy to Brian M. Madden, Leventhal, Senter &
Lerman, P.L.L.C., 2000 K Street, N.W., Suite 600, Washington,
D.C. 20006-1809.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
David H. Solomon
Chief, Enforcement Bureau
_________________________
1 Section 73.1206 of the rules provides, in pertinent part, that:
Before recording a telephone conversation for broadcast . . . a
licensee shall inform any party to the call of the licensee's
intention to broadcast the conversation, except where such party
is aware or may be presumed to be aware from the circumstances of
the conversation that it is being or likely will be broadcast.
Such awareness is presumed to exist . . . [where the non-licensee
party] originates the call and it is obvious that it is in
connection with a program in which the station customarily
broadcasts telephone conversations.
2 See Entercom New Orleans License, LLC, 17 FCC Rcd. 2160 (EB
2002).
3 See In the Matter of Amendment of Part 73 of the Commission's
Rules and Regulations With Respect To the Broadcast of Telephone
Conversations, Report and Order, 23 FCC 2d 1,2 (1970).