Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version

******************************************************** 
                      NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.

*****************************************************************



                           Before the
                Federal Communications Commission
                     Washington, D.C. 20554

In the Matter of                )
                                )
Illinet Communications of Central Illinois, L.L.C.     )    File 
No. EB-02-TS-264
                                )
Operator of Cable Systems in:   )
                                )    
Brocton, Illinois               )
Hume, Illinois                  )
Sidell, Illinois                )
                                )
Request for Waiver of Section 11.11(a) of the     )    
Commission's Rules              )    
                                        
                              ORDER 

Adopted:  October 21, 2002              Released:   October   25, 
2002

By the Chief, Technical  and Public Safety Division,  Enforcement 
Bureau:


1.        In this  Order,  we  grant  Illinet  Communications  of 
  Central  Illinois,  L.L.C.  (``Illinet'')  temporary   36-month 
  waivers  of   Section  11.11(a)  of   the  Commission's   Rules 
  (``Rules'')  for  the three  above-captioned  cable  television 
  systems.   Section  11.11(a)  requires  cable  systems  serving 
  fewer than 5,000  subscribers from a headend to either  provide 
  national  level Emergency  Alert System  (``EAS'') messages  on 
  all programmed channels or install EAS equipment and provide  a 
  video interrupt and audio alert on all programmed channels  and 
  EAS  audio  and  video messages  on  at  least  one  programmed 
  channel by October 1, 2002.1

2.        The Cable Act of 1992  added new Section 624(g) to  the 
  Communications  Act  of 1934  (``Act''),  which  requires  that 
  cable  systems be  capable of  providing  EAS alerts  to  their 
  subscribers.2  In 1994, the Commission adopted rules  requiring 
  cable systems to participate in EAS.3  In 1997, the  Commission 
  amended the  EAS rules  to provide financial  relief for  small 
  cable systems.4  The Commission declined to exempt small  cable 
  systems  from the  EAS requirements,  concluding that  such  an 
  exemption would be  inconsistent with the statutory mandate  of 
  Section  624(g).5    However,  the   Commission  extended   the 
  deadline   for  cable   systems  serving   fewer  than   10,000 
  subscribers to  begin complying with the  EAS rules to  October 
  1, 2002,  and provided cable systems  serving fewer than  5,000 
  subscribers the option  of either providing national level  EAS 
  messages  on   all  programmed  channels   or  installing   EAS 
  equipment and  providing a video interrupt  and audio alert  on 
  all programmed channels and EAS audio and video messages on  at 
  least  one programmed  channel.6  In  addition, the  Commission 
  stated that  it would grant waivers of  the EAS rules to  small 
  cable  systems  on  a case-by-case  basis  upon  a  showing  of 
  financial  hardship.7   The Commission  indicated  that  waiver 
  requests must contain at least the following information:   (1) 
  justification for the waiver, with reference to the  particular 
  rule sections  for which  a waiver is  sought; (2)  information 
  about the financial status of the requesting entity, such as  a 
  balance sheet and  income statement for the two previous  years 
  (audited, if possible);  (3) the number of other entities  that 
  serve the  requesting entity's coverage area  and that have  or 
  are expected to  install EAS equipment; and (4) the  likelihood 
  (such  as proximity  or frequency)  of hazardous  risks to  the 
  requesting entity's audience.8

3.        On  June  21,  2002,   Illinet  filed  a  request   for 
  temporary, 36-month waivers  of Section 11.11(a) for the  three 
  captioned  cable systems.  In support  of its  waiver  request, 
  Illinet states that  these are small, rural cable systems  with 
  few subscribers.  Illinet notes that the Brocton system  serves 
  46 subscribers, the Hume system serves 102 subscribers and  the 
  Sidell system  serves 103 subscribers.   Based on price  quotes 
  provided  by  EAS equipment  manufacturers,  Illinet  estimates 
  that  it  would  cost  approximately  $21,000  to  install  EAS 
  equipment at  these systems. Illinet asserts  that the cost  of 
  installing  EAS  equipment   at  the  systems  will  impose   a 
  substantial  financial hardship  on it  and provides  financial 
  statements for 2000 and 2001 in support of this assertion.   In 
  addition, Illinet  submits that its  subscribers will  continue 
  to have  ready access  to national EAS  information from  other 
  sources, including its  cable systems.  In this regard  Illinet 
  notes that  its subscribers currently  have access to  national 
  EAS  messages  on  at  least  60  percent  of  all   programmed 
  channels. Illinet also  asserts that its subscribers will  have 
  access  to EAS  information through  over-the-air reception  of 
  broadcast television and radio stations and other sources.

4.        Based upon our review of  the financial data and  other 
  information submitted by  Illinet, we conclude that  temporary, 
  36-month waivers  of Section 11.11(a)  for the three  captioned 
  cable systems are warranted.9  In particular, we find that  the 
  estimated $21,000 cost  of EAS equipment for these small  cable 
  systems could impose financial hardship on Illinet.  

5.        We note that  the Commission recently  amended the  EAS 
  rules  to  permit  cable  systems  serving  fewer  than   5,000 
  subscribers  to   install  FCC-certified  decoder-only   units, 
  rather  than both  encoders  and  decoders, if  such  a  device 
  becomes  available.10    Based  on   comments  from   equipment 
  manufacturers, we  anticipate that such  a decoder-only  system 
  could  result  in  significant  cost  savings  to  small  cable 
  systems.11  

6.        Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED  that, pursuant to  Sections 
  0.111,   0.204(b)   and   0.311   of   the   Rules,12   Illinet 
  Communications of Central Illinois, L.L.C. IS GRANTED a  waiver 
  of Section 11.11(a) of the Rules until October 1, 2005 for  the 
  three captioned cable television systems.

7.        IT IS FURTHER  ORDERED that  Illinet Communications  of 
  Central Illinois,  L.L.C. place a  copy of this  waiver in  its 
  system files.

8.        IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that  a copy of this Order  shall 
  be sent by  Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to  counsel 
  for  Illinois  Communications  of  Central  Illinois,   L.L.C., 
  Christopher  C. Cinnamon,  Esq.,  Cinnamon Mueller,  307  North 
  Michigan Avenue, Suite 1020, Chicago, Illinois 60601.

                         FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
                         


                         Joseph P. Casey
                         Chief, Technical and Public Safety 
Division
                         Enforcement Bureau





_________________________

  1 47 C.F.R. § 11.11(a).

  2 Cable Television  Consumer Protection and Competition Act  of 
1992, Pub. L. No. 102-385, § 16(b), 106 Stat. 1460, 1490  (1992).  
Section 624(g) provides that  ``each cable operator shall  comply 
with such standards as the  Commission shall prescribe to  ensure 
that viewers of video programming  on cable systems are  afforded 
the same emergency  information as is  afforded by the  emergency 
broadcasting system pursuant to Commission regulations ....''  47 
U.S.C. § 544(g).  

  3 Amendment  of Part 73, Subpart  G, of the Commission's  Rules 
Regarding the Emergency  Broadcast System, Report  and Order  and 
Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, FO Docket Nos. 91-171/91-
301, 10  FCC  Rcd  1786  (1994)  (``First  Report  and  Order''), 
reconsideration granted in part, denied in part, 10 FCC Rcd 11494 
(1995).

  4 Amendment  of Part 73, Subpart  G, of the Commission's  Rules 
Regarding the  Emergency  Broadcast  System,  Second  Report  and 
Order, FO  Docket Nos.  91-171/91-301, 12  FCC Rcd  15503  (1997) 
(``Second Report and Order'').

  5 Id. at 15512-13.

  6 Id. at 15516-15518.

  7 Id. at 15513.

  8 Id. at 15513, n. 59.

  9 The  waivers will extend from  October 1, 2002 until  October 
1, 2005.   We  clarify that  the  waivers we  are  granting  also 
encompass the EAS testing and monitoring requirements. 

  10 Amendment  of Part  11 of the  Commission's Rules  Regarding 
the Emergency Alert System,  EB Docket 01-66, FCC  02-64 at ¶  71 
(released February 26, 2002).

  11 One manufacturer  estimated that an EAS decoder-only  system 
can reduce the cost by 64% over what a cable operator would spend 
for an encoder/decoder unit.  Id. at ¶ 70.

  12 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.111, 0.204(b) and 0.311.