Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the Matter of )
)
Informal Complaints Filed By )
Independent Payphone Service ) File No. IC-98-42853, et al.
Providers Against Various )
Local Exchange Carriers )
Seeking Refunds Of End User )
Common Line Charges )
ORDER
Adopted: February 4, 2002 Released: February 5,
2002
By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau:
1. In this Order, we extend the deadline for converting
End User Common Line (``EUCL'') informal complaints into
formal complaints.1 In these informal complaints,
independent payphone providers (``IPPs'') allege that the
defendant local exchange carriers (``LECs'') improperly
assessed EUCL charges, in violation of the Commission's
rules and sections 201(b) and 202(a) of the Communications
Act, as amended (the ``Act'').2 Because the IPPs' claims
are similar to those asserted by other IPPs in formal
complaint proceedings that were already before the
Commission in 1999,3 the deadline for conversion of these
informal complaints into formal complaints was previously
modified to be ``no less than 90 days after a final
nonappealable order has been entered'' in the formal
complaint proceedings.4
2. On April 13, 2000, the Commission, in these formal
complaint proceedings, ruled that the defendant LECs
improperly assessed EUCL charges upon the Complainants.5
On November 9, 2001, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia affirmed the Commission's liability
determinations.6 Unless a party files a writ of
certiorari within the statutory time frame, this Appeals
Court Decision will constitute a final, non-appealable
order on February 9, 2002.7
3. The Commission is aware that parties to these informal
complaints have begun to discuss settlement prospects. In
light of these efforts, we now extend to September 9,
2002, the filing deadline for the conversion of these EUCL
informal complaints into formal complaints. 8 Because
this extension will facilitate the possible settlement of
these numerous claims, we are satisfied that our action
today serves the public interest.
4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i),
4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47
U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 208, section 1.3 of the
Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and the authority
delegated by sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's
rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.011 and 0.311, that section 1.718(a)
of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.718(a), IS HEREBY
WAIVED, with regard to the IPP EUCL informal complaints
described herein and the deadline for the conversion and
filing of these informal complaints into formal complaints
is hereby extended to September 9, 2002. This waiver is
effective as of the release of this Order.
5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Secretary of the
Commission shall cause to have this Order published in the
Federal Register.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
David H. Solomon,
Chief, Enforcement Bureau
_________________________
1 Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint
must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the
informal complaint. 47 C.F.R. § 1.718(a).
2 47 U.S.C. §§ 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. §§ 69.1 et seq.
3 See C.F. Communications Corp. v. FCC, 128 F.3d 735 (D.C.
Cir. 1997); see also C.F. Communications Corp. v. FCC, No. 97-
1202, slip. op (D.C. Cir. 1997); C.F. Communications Corp. v.
Century Telephone of Wisconsin, Inc. et. al., Memorandum Opinion
and Order, 8 FCC Rcd 7334, 7335-36 (1993); C.F. Communications
Corp. v. Century Telephone of Wisconsin, Inc., et. al.,
Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 9775 (1995); C.F.
Communications Corp., et. al. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co., et.
al., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 2134 (1997).
4 Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service
Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking
Refunds of End User Common Line Charges, File No. 89-170, DA 99-
1858, Common Carrier Bureau (rel. Sept. 10, 1999) ("Waiver
Order"), at ¶ 5.
5 C.F. Communications Corp., et al. v. Century Telephone of
Wisconsin, Inc., et. al., Memorandum Opinion and Order on
Remand, 15 FCC Rcd 8759, 8768 (2000).
6 Verizon Telephone Companies, et al. v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098,
1109 (D.C. Cir. 2001).
7 See 28 U.S.C. § 2350 (Application for a writ of certiorari
shall be made within 90 days after entry of the judgement). The
D.C. Circuit's decision was entered on November 9, 2001. See
also Waiver Order at ¶ 5.
8 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.718 et seq.