Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
SEPARATE STATEMENT OF
COMMISSIONER JONATHAN S. ADELSTEIN
Re: In the Matter of Review of the Emergency Alert System,
EB Docket No. 04-296.
Not only does Section One of the Communications Act of
1934 make the Commission responsible for promoting the
``safety of life and property through the use of wire and
radio communication,'' it also charges the Commission with
making communications available ``to all the people of the
United States, without discrimination on the basis of race,
color, religion, national origin, or sex.'' In this item,
we take a few important steps toward satisfying these
important statutory obligations, but there remains some
heavy lifting to do very soon.
I am pleased to support this item, as it expands the
obligation to transmit Presidential-level emergency messages
from analog broadcast and cable to include new distribution
platforms - digital broadcast and cable, and satellite radio
and television. Equally important, this item encourages the
voluntary transmission of multilingual emergency information
in areas where a significant proportion of the population
has its primary fluency in a language other than English.
Until the Commission has had an opportunity to examine this
issue more fully, I strongly encourage all EAS participants
to provide this important public safety service.
We cannot overemphasize the importance of disseminating
emergency information in multiple languages. In New Orleans
alone, it is estimated that there were more than 50,000
Spanish-speaking residents, and the only Spanish language
station in the area was off-air before Hurricane Katrina
even reached city limits. It stayed off the air for the
next seven days. While all Gulf Coast broadcasters
performed admirably - with great personal sacrifice - to
provide news coverage to millions of households, some non-
English speaking households may have been left in complete
darkness. As set forth in Section 1 of the Communications
Act, we have an obligation to address this problem.
We must find ways to ensure that all households have
access to emergency warnings and alerts in a language they
understand and that EAS meets the needs of individuals with
hearing and vision disabilities. All of us at the
Commission should closely review and consider the comments
of interested parties, and engage broadcasters, minority and
disability groups in a constructive dialogue with the goal
of achieving a sensible consensus on multilingual emergency
alert information and disability access.
In the past four years, this nation has experienced
several disasters - Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, the East
Coast blackout and, of course, the September 11th terrorist
attacks. Noticeably unused during all of these disasters
was the activation of EAS ¾ an alert system intended to
deliver Presidential-level messages only.
While these recent disasters have focused attention on
ways to improve our national system, clearly, we also need
to focus attention on the ability of state governments to
access EAS facilities to transmit emergency information,
warnings and alerts. So it's critical that we're seeking
comment on whether we should require EAS participants to
transmit all EAS messages issued by the Governor of the
state in which they provide services. Additionally, I am
pleased we are seeking comment on how best to coordinate
with state and local governments to help implement the
expanded EAS rules we adopt today.
A final highlight is our request for comment on the
integration of new technologies, primarily wireless devices
such as cell phones, pagers, and PDA's, into our current
emergency response system. We seek comment, for example, on
the benefits and limitations of the delivery of emergency
alert messages through text-based messaging delivered by SMS
or cell broadcast. While these technologies would
complement, rather than replace, the current EAS, we should
pay careful attention to practical implications for
underserved and rural communities. We should also consider
alternative wireless technologies such as a proposal to take
advantage of an existing wireless public alert service
provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA).
We are acting on this issue with the urgency it
deserves. Just last week, the Senate Commerce Committee
approved legislation - the Warning, Alert, and Response
Network (WARN) Act - to create an enhanced emergency alert
system. The WARN Act would finance the creation of an All
Hazards Alert System to deliver emergency warnings and
alerts across a variety of devices, including mobile phones
and Blackberry devices. While the National Program Office
would be established within NOAA, the FCC along with
National Institute of Standards and Technology and the
Federal Emergency Management Agency would form a working
group to develop this new, enhanced alert system and to
prepare guidelines for the technical capabilities of the
system. The Act would also give governors access to
broadcast a message in their respective States.
I am pleased to support our decision to expand EAS to
require, not just analog broadcast and cable, but also
digital broadcast and satellite radio and television, to
transmit national emergency warnings and alerts. The heavy
lifting will come when we consider multilingual emergency
information dissemination, greater disability access,
coordination with state and local governments, and the
integration of new wireless technologies into EAS. I thank
the Chairman for his leadership on this matter, and I look
forward to working with him and all of my colleagues on
these and other EAS-related issues as quickly as possible.