Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the Matter of )
)
Rochester City School District ) File No. EB-FIELDNER-13-00007354
Antenna Structure Registrant )
ASR # 1233216 ) NOV No. V201332400022
Rochester, New York )
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Released: March 28, 2013
By the District Director, Philadelphia Office, Northeast Region,
Enforcement Bureau:
1. This is a Notice of Violation (Notice) issued pursuant to Section 1.89
of the Commission's rules (Rules)^ to Rochester City School District
(Rochester), registrant of antenna structure number 1233216 in
Rochester, New York. Pursuant to Section 1.89(a) of the Rules,
issuance of this NOV does not preclude the Enforcement Bureau from
further action if warranted, including issuing a Notice of Apparent
Liability for Forfeiture for the violations noted herein.^
2. On March 7, 2013, agents of the Enforcement Bureau's Philadelphia
Office inspected antenna structure number 1233216 located in
Rochester, New York and observed the following violations:
a. 47 C.F.R. S 17.4(g): "...the Antenna Structure Registration Number
must be displayed in a conspicuous place so that it is readily
visible near the base of the antenna structure. Materials used to
display the Antenna Structure Registration Number must be
weather-resistant and of sufficient size to be easily seen at the
base of the antenna structure." At the time of inspection, the
Antenna Structure Registration Number was not posted.
b. 47 C.F.R. S 17.23: "Unless otherwise specified by the Commission,
each new or altered antenna structure to be registered on or after
January 1, 1996, must conform to the FAA's painting and lighting
recommendations set forth on the structure's FAA determination of `no
hazard' ...." The FCC's Antenna Structure Registration (ASR) database
currently indicates that antenna structure # 1233216 requires marking
and red obstruction lighting during the nighttime in accordance with
FAA circular number 70/7460-1K, FAA Chapters 3, 4, 5, 12. At the
time of inspection, the antenna structure's top level red obstruction
light was not flashing but instead was steady burning.
c. 47. C.F.R. S 17.51(a): "All red obstruction lighting shall be
exhibited from sunset to sunrise unless otherwise specified." At the
time of the inspection, one of the two steady-burning red side
markers at the 2/3 level and both steady-burning red side markers at
the 1/3 level were extinguished.
d. 47 C.F.R.S17.47(a): "The owner of any antenna structure which is
registered with the Commission and has been assigned lighting
specifications referenced in this part: (a)(1) Shall make an
observation of the antenna structure's lights at least once each 24
hours either visually or by observing an automatic properly
maintained indicator designed to register any failure of such lights,
to insure that all such lights are functioning properly as required;
or alternatively, (2) Shall provide and properly maintain an
automatic alarm system designed to detect any failure of such lights
and to provide indication of such failure to the owner." At the time
of the inspection, Rochester's representative told the agents that
the lights on antenna structure number 1233216 were not visually
monitored and that there was no automatic alarm system.
3. Pursuant to Section 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended,^ and Section 1.89 of the Rules, we seek additional
information concerning the violations and any remedial actions taken.
Therefore, Rochester must submit a written statement concerning this
matter within twenty (20) days of release of this Notice. The response
(i) must fully explain each violation, including all relevant
surrounding facts and circumstances, (ii) must contain a statement of
the specific action(s) taken to correct each violation and preclude
recurrence, and (iii) must include a time line for completion of any
pending corrective action(s). The response must be complete in itself
and must not be abbreviated by reference to other communications or
answers to other notices.^
4. In accordance with Section 1.16 of the Rules, we direct Rochester to
support its response to this Notice with an affidavit or declaration
under penalty of perjury, signed and dated by an authorized officer
for Rochester with personal knowledge of the representations provided
in Rochester's response, verifying the truth and accuracy of the
information therein,^ and confirming that all of the information
requested by this Notice which is in the licensee's possession,
custody, control, or knowledge has been produced. To knowingly and
willfully make any false statement or conceal any material fact in
reply to this Notice is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title
18 of the U.S. Code.^
5. All replies and documentation sent in response to this Notice should
be marked with the File No. and NOV No. specified above, and mailed to
the following address:
Federal Communications Commission
Philadelphia Office
One Oxford Valley Building, Suite 404
2300 East Lincoln Highway
Langhorne, Pennsylvania 19047
6. This Notice shall be sent to Rochester, City School District at its
address of record.
7. The Privacy Act of 1974^ requires that we advise you that the
Commission will use all relevant material information before it,
including any information disclosed in your reply, to determine what,
if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
David C. Dombrowski
District Director
Philadelphia District Office
Northeast Region
Enforcement Bureau
^ 47 C.F.R. S 1.89.
^ 47 C.F.R. S 1.89(a).
^ 47 U.S.C. S 403.
^ 47 C.F.R. S 1.89(c).
^ Section 1.16 of the Commission's rules provides that "[a]ny document to
be filed with the Federal Communications Commission and which is required
by any law, rule or other regulation of the United States to be supported,
evidenced, established or proved by a written sworn declaration,
verification, certificate, statement, oath or affidavit by the person
making the same, may be supported, evidenced, established or proved by the
unsworn declaration, certification, verification, or statement in writing
of such person . . . . Such declaration shall be subscribed by the
declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially
the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under
penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on
(date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S 1.16.
^ 18 U.S.C. S 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S 1.17.
^ P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S 552a(e)(3).
Federal Communications Commission
3
Federal Communications Commission