Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the Matter of )
)
Adelman Broadcasting, Inc. ) File No. EB-FIELDWR-12-00003565
Licensee of Station KGBB )
Facility ID # 457 )
) NOV No. V201332900005
Edwards, CA )
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Released: November 30, 2012
By the Acting District Director, Los Angeles Office, Western Region,
Enforcement Bureau:
1. This is a Notice of Violation (Notice) issued pursuant to Section 1.89
of the Commission's rules (Rules), to Adelman Broadcasting Inc.
licensee of radio station KGBB serving Edwards, California. Pursuant
to Section 1.89(a) of the Rules, issuance of this Notice does not
preclude the Enforcement Bureau from further action if warranted,
including issuing a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture for
the violation(s) noted herein.
2. On July 16, 2012, an agent of the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles
Office inspected radio station KGBB's main studio located at Quartz
Hill, California, and observed the following violations:
a. 47 C.F.R. S: 11.35(a): "EAS Participants must determine the cause of
any failure to receive the required tests or activations specified in
S:11.61(a)(1) and (2). Appropriate entries indicating reasons why any
tests were not received must be made in the broadcast station log as
specified in S:S:73.1820 and 73.1840 of this chapter for all
broadcast streams ...." At the time of the inspection, there were no
entries for the previous three months in the station's logs
indicating receipt and retransmission of required monthly tests by
either of the two sources being monitored by KGBB's EAS
decoder/encoder. The station's logs failed to show explanations by
the Chief Operator for why these tests were not received and
retransmitted.
b. 47 C.F.R. S: 11.52(d)(1): "With respect to monitoring for EAS
messages that are formatted in accordance with the EAS Protocol, EAS
Participants must monitor two EAS sources. The monitoring assignments
of each broadcast station and cable system and wireless cable system
are specified in the State EAS Plan and FCC Mapbook. They are
developed in accordance with FCC monitoring priorities." At the time
of the inspection, the agent observed that station KGBB was not
monitoring the correct LP-1 and LP-2 stations as required by the Kern
County EAS plan.
c. 47 C.F.R. S: 11.56(a): "On or by June 30, 2012, EAS Participants must
have deployed operational equipment that is capable of the following:
(1) Acquiring EAS alert messages in accordance with the monitoring
requirements in S:11.52(d)(2); (2) Converting EAS alert messages that
have been formatted pursuant to the Organization for the Advancement
of Structured Information Standards (OASIS) Common Alerting Protocol
Version 1.2 (July 1, 2010), and Common Alerting Protocol, v. 1.2 USA
Integrated Public Alert and Warning System Profile Version 1.0 (Oct.
13, 2009), into EAS alert messages that comply with the EAS Protocol,
such that the Preamble and EAS Header Codes, audio Attention Signal,
audio message, and Preamble and EAS End of Message (EOM) Codes of
such messages are rendered equivalent to the EAS Protocol (set forth
in S:11.31), in accordance with the technical specifications
governing such conversion process set forth in the EAS-CAP Industry
Group's (ECIG) Recommendations for a CAP EAS Implementation Guide,
Version 1.0 (May 17, 2010) (except that any and all specifications
set forth therein related to gubernatorial "must carry" shall not be
followed, and that EAS Participants may adhere to the specifications
related to text-to-speech on a voluntary basis); (3) Processing such
converted messages in accordance with the other sections of this
part." At the time of the inspection, KGBB was not equipped with a
CAP enabled EAS encoder/decoder or intermediary device capable of
receiving, transmitting or translating CAP encoded messages."
d. 47 C.F.R. S: 73.1870(c)(3): "(c) The chief operator is responsible
for completion of the following duties specified in this paragraph
below. When these duties are delegated to other persons, the chief
operator shall maintain supervisory oversight sufficient to know that
each requirement has been fulfilled in a timely and correct manner...
(3) Review of the station records at least once each week to
determine if required entries are being made correctly. Additionally,
verification must be made that the station has been operated as
required by the rules or the station authorization. Upon completion
of the review, the chief operator or his designee must date and sign
the log, initiate any corrective action which may be necessary, and
advise the station licensee of any condition which is repetitive." At
the time of inspection, the Chief Operator was not signing the EAS
logs weekly on a regular basis. The Los Angeles agent observed with
multiple omissions over a three and on half month period prior to the
inspection.
3. As the nation's emergency warning system, the Emergency Alert System
is critical to public safety, and we recognize the vital role that
broadcasters play in ensuring its success. The Commission takes
seriously any violations of the Rules implementing the EAS and expects
full compliance from its regulatees. We also must investigate
violations of other rules that apply to broadcaster licensees.
4. Pursuant to Section 308(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, and Section 1.89 of the Rules, we seek additional information
concerning the violations and any remedial actions taken. Therefore,
Adelman Broadcasting Inc. must submit a written statement concerning
this matter within twenty (20) days of release of this Notice. The
response (i) must fully explain each violation, including all relevant
surrounding facts and circumstances, (ii) must contain a statement of
the specific action(s) taken to correct each violation and preclude
recurrence, and (iii) must include a time line for completion of any
pending corrective action(s). The response must be complete in itself
and must not be abbreviated by reference to other communications or
answers to other notices.
5. In accordance with Section 1.16 of the Rules, we direct Adelman
Broadcasting Inc. to support its response to this Notice with an
affidavit or declaration under penalty of perjury, signed and dated by
an authorized officer of Adelman Broadcasting Inc. with personal
knowledge of the representations provided in Adelman Broadcasting
Inc.'s response, verifying the truth and accuracy of the information
therein, and confirming that all of the information requested by this
Notice which is in the licensee's possession, custody, control, or
knowledge has been produced. To knowingly and willfully make any false
statement or conceal any material fact in reply to this Notice is
punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code.
6. All replies and documentation sent in response to this Notice should
be marked with the File No. and NOV No. specified above, and mailed to
the following address:
Federal Communications Commission
Los Angeles Office
18000 Studebaker Road., Suite 660
Cerritos, CA 90703
7. This Notice shall be sent to Adelman Broadcasting Inc. at its address
of record.
8. The Privacy Act of 1974 requires that we advise you that the
Commission will use all relevant material information before it,
including any information disclosed in your reply, to determine what,
if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Margaret M. Egler
Acting District Director
Los Angeles Office
Western Region
Enforcement Bureau
47 C.F.R. S: 1.89.
47 C.F.R. S: 1.89(a).
47 U.S.C. S: 308(b).
47 C.F.R. S: 1.89(c).
Section 1.16 of the Rules provides that "[a]ny document to be filed with
the Federal Communications Commission and which is required by any law,
rule or other regulation of the United States to be supported, evidenced,
established or proved by a written sworn declaration, verification,
certificate, statement, oath or affidavit by the person making the same,
may be supported, evidenced, established or proved by the unsworn
declaration, certification, verification, or statement in writing of such
person . . . . Such declaration shall be subscribed by the declarant as
true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following
form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of
perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date).
(Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16.
18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17.
P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3).
Federal Communications Commission
2
Federal Communications Commission